09-05-2017, 09:49 AM | #435 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
|
|
09-05-2017, 09:51 AM | #436 | |
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
09-05-2017, 09:55 AM | #437 | |
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
09-05-2017, 10:02 AM | #438 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Alright risky Justice I don't know how else I can tell you how old this is getting So I do stick by what I said the V6 for daily driver is a damn fine automobile The exhaust sounds exotic even according to GM I stick by the fact that you can't use the 6th gen ss power fully on the street hell I'll even throw you can't use the full power of the V6 LG X on the street unless you want to risk going to jail. And yes I'll stick by what I said as well a bit the wards Personnel popping the hood to see what engine was underneath when they were reviewing the LG X Camaro for the 2016 wards testing in fact I will post a link. |
|
09-05-2017, 10:06 AM | #439 |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Here blackss stop playing your games man.
http://wardsauto.com/2016/2016-winne...s-36l-dohc-v-6 One of the biggest challenges for editors test driving 31 powertrains in the span of two months for Wards 10 Best Engines is keeping each one’s qualities clearly delineated in the mind. They tend to run together, literally. Hence, copious note taking. After a few years, editors develop their own testing sequences, such as getting on the highway and running wide-open throttle in third gear for a spell, or switching manually to sixth gear to see how the engine performs at 30 mph (48 km/h). Those are the memories that stick. And yet, when two Chevrolet Camaros arrived for testing near the end of our cycle, when the winners are starting to sort themselves out, when we’re all highly attuned to what we’re driving, The fact that a few editors needed to pop the hood or look at the Monroney to clarify which powerplant was spinning the wheels speaks volumes about the all-new 3.6L all-aluminum V-6 (codename LGX) that also is an excellent addition to the Cadillac ATS and CTS lineup. ADVERTISING, MOUSE OVER FOR AUDIO It muscles its way onto the 2016 Wards 10 Best Engines list not because it’s better than the LT1 V-8, which was seeking a third consecutive trophy, but because it so powerfully completes the Camaro tandem. It’s the right hand to the V-8’s left. It’s so good that certain editors prefer it to the V-8, and it doesn’t hurt that the LGX’s exhaust sounds V-8-like at times. The V-6 so soundly trounces two of the other all-new naturally aspirated V-6s in this year’s competition that it barely seems like a fair fight. Also worth noting: Four naturally aspirated V-6s were evaluated, and only GM’s LGX employs direct fuel injection. The LGX eventually will fill GM’s portfolio as a replacement for the High-Feature V-6 that won Wards 10 Best Engines honors in 2008 and 2009. From that workhorse engine, the LGX gets worthy DNA, but that’s about it. Truly, the only part carrying over is the hydraulic lash adjusters in the valvetrain Last edited by IMadeYouReadThis; 09-05-2017 at 10:21 AM. |
09-05-2017, 10:10 AM | #440 |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
This Thread has fallen apart it's gone way off topic and now it's becoming a pissing contest that I don't want to be a part of but I am. So if nobody else is going to contribute can somebody lock the thread so this does not have to continue on
|
09-05-2017, 10:16 AM | #441 | |||
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
Quote:
I also stick by what I said that you apparently forget to read that the V6 is very impressive. Here we go, you bringing up the exhaust again. Believe what you want. Since you apparently can only handle 335hp and 284tq, that doesn't mean that the SS isn't street worthy to someone else. Post the link, that still doesn't change the fact of what I said. Quote:
V6 vs. V8 threads always end up being a pissing contest. You made yourself apart of it by posting bs things about V8's.
__________________
|
|||
09-05-2017, 10:24 AM | #442 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
You're right I'm an idiot Ward Automotive is an idiot everybody's an idiot except you. Because if I don't you'll just keep on continuing on just like that screaming little girl you have an avatar as and wine and wine and repost stuff and you won't stop and I can't handle it anymore man. Everybody on here knows I never talk smack about a 6th gen SS. Everybody on here knows your car is nowhere near as fast as a 6th gen SS. Everybody on here knows your car weighs a ton more than a 6th gen. I believe the only V8 you can be defending is the one in your car which is a great V8 I love the LS engine just your car is really damn heavy man. I don't know what else to tell you bro I'm not bashing your car. It is what it is it's beastly it truly is a muscle car it's huge and heavy. At least I finally got to see where you were coming from you were looking through the eyes of an old car. It's all personal preference man your car is awesome things get better though. |
|
09-05-2017, 10:36 AM | #443 | |
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
NOW, you are wanting to compare my car to a 6th Gen SS. All along it was the V6, then V6 1LE, then the I4, and how could I forget the 4th Gen SS. I guess next you will want to compare it to the ZL1 and ZL1 1LE. Please put down the crack pipe. You make yourself look like an idiot. Really, a ton more. You do know how much a ton weighs right??? Apparently not. I didn't know 200-400lb was a ton. Damn, learn something new everyday. Again, I already agreed the 5th Gen was heavy. So what is your point, besides that you only think weight matters when it comes to handling. Yep, a four year old car is REALLY old. Damn I hate that old technology. One of these days you will grow up and learn to not paper race then you will see cars for what they really are. Until then good luck with what you believe.
__________________
|
|
09-05-2017, 10:45 AM | #444 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Your car stock is 4.5 seconds the V6 equivalent of your car is 4.9 seconds. I've only said that about 10 times that's the comparison they're both 1le models so it would be interesting to see what would be better overall on a track. Anyways man keep up the good fight and keep on twisting up words. I've been very careful because I like a lot of guys that are on the 5th gen form and I'm not going to bash their car just to take a shot at you. The 5th gen in the 6 gen are completely different beasts. I like the fifth gem especially the 2010 to the 2013 model. I think the 2014 2015 leave a lot to be desired in the looks Department though. But I will say again your Avatar's perfect you |
|
09-05-2017, 10:54 AM | #445 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
The Camaro is not a practical car in any way. This car sucks for everything except two things: acceleration and handling. Sure, the interior is pretty nice and the exterior is very nice, but does that all make up for the fact that there isn't much of a trunk, only a midget can comfortably fit in the back seat, and gas mileage is so-so. It just seems odd to not want the higher performance options, when you're doing with a car like this. The ATS is though, if you want the V6--just saying. The Camaro is a sports car, yes, which is why the V6 NA engine makes no sense to me. The 4 cylinder turbo should be the only other engine choice; unless they're going to offer a twin turbo V6, at which point the V8 would either need to be offered as twin turbo, or become irrelevant (this will happen eventually anyway). If you're going to modify the car at all--this is my opinion anyway. We all have our opinions though, and it's obvious none of us are going to change each others minds
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
|
09-05-2017, 10:54 AM | #446 | |
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 698
|
Quote:
AGAIN, 0-60 times do not mean squat when it comes to a road course. I've only said that, I don't know how many times but again you are paper racing and only know 0-60 times. Look in the mirror when it comes to twisting words. I've quoted you numerous times with what you wrote. I haven't twisted anything, only you. You can take a shot at me all you want. I could really give two shits about it. We don't have to like each other but you do need to learn the facts which apparently will never happen. Everyone has a different opinion of what they like. If you like the '10-'13 5th Gens more then good for you. As for the avatar comment....
__________________
|
|
09-05-2017, 11:01 AM | #447 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
So basically your point is the V6 is not good enough to put in the Camaro you're still going on about the turbo 4. I don't know what to tell you man I gave you links from GM I gave you links from Ward the V6 is quite good I can't change your mind on it that's fine. I'm glad you liked my comment on your avatar the screaming girl seems perfect for you |
|
09-05-2017, 11:04 AM | #448 | |
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Ok bro the V6 sucks you win |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|