![]() |
|
|
#491 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 2LT / RS - 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 519
|
Quote:
Glad you understand, but I don't see any car as 'fast' or 'slow'. Basically, one car is capable of going faster than another... and there will ALWAYS be a car that's faster than that one. So yes, the V6 is fast and the V8 is faster... get it? For me there is no point in a V8. On my 89 Firebird Formula was a 305 V8, and I took good care of it but never really raced except off of red lights to smoke a few Mustangs... but seriously if it was a regular Firebird V6 it would have made hardly any difference. Then I got a 96 Ford Explorer Limited with also a V8 210HP (I think), since it's a big vehicle and I often loaded stuff into it I thought it would make sense. Aside the V8 having a automatic transmission and front hubs that are capable of handling the power there wouldn't have been much of a difference either. So the 2010 Camaro V6 312HP has more power than those previous V8's. Knowing my needs by now and how I drive it's already more than enough making the V8 400HP just a waste of money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#492 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 2LT / RS - 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 519
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#493 | |
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#494 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Quote:
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#495 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
I assume you mean the SS and not just any V8. In that case the answer is yes, even ignoring gas and insurance (although I think that is a legit concern for many). I almost had enough for the vette, but my dealer knew how much I love green. When he told me I could get the Synergy, I had to drive a V6. Loved it. Went home and did a little research and saw what potential this engine has. It already puts out 86.7 HP/Liter vs. the 68.7 for the LS3. BMW and Mazda are putting out impressive power and speed with similar engines. Modded Mazdaspeed3s are putting 350+ HP to the wheels on a 3200 lb. car. This technology is the future and I wanted in on it. I love the challenge it presents and all the hours of fun I'm having working on it. Actually having to sit down and design a twin turbo from scratch because no one has ever done it for this car is a lot more fun than buying a kit in my book. You want easy power, I want fun, challenging power.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
#496 |
|
Loose is Fast!
Drives: Mikes Hard Lemons Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brick House
Posts: 645
|
|
|
|
|
|
#497 |
|
Loose is Fast!
Drives: Mikes Hard Lemons Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brick House
Posts: 645
|
Peace!
|
|
|
|
|
#498 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaros...is there anything else? Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Great Lake State
Posts: 1,048
|
Quote:
1) I have other Camaros with V8 power. 2) I am replacing a daily driver that got 11-14mpg 3) I drive appx 40k miles a year, if I get 2-5 mpg better in the V6, than the V8, you do the math. 4) IF the insurance and gas were the same I would still get the V6 for the MILEAGE! 5) If I want to go tear up a track or have DIFFERENT fun(load exhaust, sound of V8) I will pull out one of my other Camaros, which also see about 3-5k miles a piece per year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#499 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
i really think for the most part, it isn't the V6 camaro that people have problem with, its their poseour owners who seem to live in a dream world where a 3700+ pound car making ONLY 260+- RWHP is supposed to be "musclecar" in this day and age of monster 600hp cars. Sure it feels fast but it isn't fast. A Silverado feels fast, too. Now if this is your first 260rwhp car, then that's understable. blah blah blah makes more power than V8 Camaros of the past, blah blah, cost less in gas and insurance, blah blah, its a donor car for future mods.
Yo MikeSS, how is the carwash business doing? Slow I imagine these days. |
|
|
|
|
#500 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#501 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Quote:
![]() So, in the world of 600 HP cars, would the folks that bought the SS also be "poseour owners" too because they only get 400-426 on a heaver car? Would the owner of a V6 that has 600 HP be more or less of a "poseour owner" than a SS owner with 426 HP? And where does the owner of a 650 HP I-4 fit into this scheme? Just trying to understand your logic here.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#502 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 2LT - 73 Corvette 454 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
I've owned two Z/28's in my life. A '68 and a '79. Both nice cars. The '68 was a lemon though. It went through clutches and push rods like they were wiper blades. I traded the '68 on a '73 Vette and never looked back. The '79 Z/28 I bought new and drove it for 16 years. It was a muscle car in name and badging only. The 350 it had turned out less HP than my new 2011 V6. But it was a nice cruiser and I used it as a family car when my kids were younger. Now I'm on my current Camaro, a V6 2LT/RS. I wanted another cruiser and it will get used like the '79 of old, but it's got a lot more power and feels sportier than the '79. It's a lot heavier and feels much bigger than the '68. And it sure doesn't have the shear power of that old 302. But I think it will be more reliable, and where the '68 was getting 12MPG on a good day, and the '79 got about 16MPG on it's good day, I expect the 2011 to give me 23-24MPG after if get broken in in daily driving. Yup, I love my new one. I loved my old ones too. All 3 were different beasts, but I have no regrets at buying the V6 this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#503 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
Quote:
anyway, yep you are right. V6 is a musclecar. Mike's SS is more "muscular" though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#504 | |
|
Drives: G5.R Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V6 Camaro Performance Upgrades | rtcat600man | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 387 | 09-19-2019 07:53 PM |
| 1998 Camaro v6 auto Thompsons Station, TN $4900 OBO | Looking Good in Red | Autos For Sale / Wanted | 2 | 07-21-2009 05:27 PM |
| Autoblog drives V6 Camaro w/ ground effects and GMPP wheels. Shares public reaction. | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 1 | 07-13-2009 12:17 PM |
| Tired of it people | chewy4ce | Off-topic Discussions | 88 | 01-30-2009 12:22 AM |