![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,985
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 99 Camaro; 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,985
|
inferno why the change on the pulley?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Supercharged LSX
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Black/Carbon Fiber Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,741
|
Guess the 3.75 will run at 11PSI. Prob be to much for a stock bottom.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() Drives: Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Inglewood
Posts: 532
|
Whats up fellas.
I'm getting mixed answers from my sources on whats the right pulley to have on the car for our particular purposes. So rather than roll the dice. I went ahead and made sure that we are gona have several different pulleys on hand and ready to swap while we're on the dyno. We're gona start big 4" and work our way down. Inferno is on a stock bottom end, and for now we wanna keep it that way. So our goals for this build are gona be in the high 500 low 600rwhp range. Which should be easy. I believe that the current setup is more than capable of surpassing these #'s, as some of you have stated. However with stock internals anything past 600rwhp is playin with fire. Please keep in mind that we're talking about well over 700fwhp on hyperpathetic pistons and mediocre rods. Oh and BTW, i think it was touched upon already. But RWHP and what a motor can handle don't correlate directly to boost #'s. and vise versa A while back we did a very custom GTO making 930rwhp on a 389ci motor, running on 91 octane and meth, daily driver, with only 13lbs of boost. Effieciency is so crucial to these combos. Thanks Mike Haddad |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am making 625rwhp/595rwtq at 8.5psi with stock internals with a Maggie & 3.4 pulley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Supercharged LSX
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Black/Carbon Fiber Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,741
|
thats about my goal. I do want to break 600, but I think Haddad just want it to be safe and last.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
I got 535/519 at 8psi on a L99 with a Kenne Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
![]() |
![]() 7psi was peak run.
__________________
85 Buick TType - 5.3l GT4202r 10.86 at 126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| psi, rwhp, rwtq, supercharged, turbo |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Supercharger / Turbocharger Results (INFO) Thread | radz28 | Forced Induction - V8 | 273 | 08-15-2023 05:44 PM |
| LSX 376 what kind of power | Blown90Z | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 6 | 03-18-2011 07:33 PM |
| STS Twin Turbos | SupremacyCustoms | Forced Induction - V8 | 0 | 02-16-2010 02:35 PM |
| Well sunroof question answered (PIC) | Black5thgen | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 152 | 08-29-2009 11:23 PM |
| GM only making 40K Camaros ? | liquidfire350 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 81 | 07-22-2009 11:40 AM |