10' SS vs 06' 300 SRT8 (both auto/CAI/exhaust)

[2010redcamaro]

What's actually done to your g35? My buddy has a black one with dual intakes kaizen tuned and a exhaust he ran a 14.1 at 100 at Lebanon his is auto tho

[Stew]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Backup camera is standard on every mass produced car 2013 and newer, it's now mandated. Nice try. Those amenities add weight and make you slower, why would you want that or why would WRX owner want rear DVD players ? Plus there ought to be something in the $35,000+ price gap.

Different buyers, period, lets be honest here, someone looking at an SRT-8, anythingreally, is NOT going to be looking at a WRX. Yes options add weight, but in the Grand Cherokees price range these things are EXPECTED. And i guess someone with kids would want rear DVD players, that is why it is OPTIONAL on the Grand Cherokee SRT8...........

[Stew]

Originally Posted by ESARETEE8

Not Necessarily, the L99 has a tune which makes a world of difference it should pull the SRT8 that isn't tuned.

Heres what they look like racing basically stock
http://www.streetfire.net/video/cama...t8_2304480.htm

My bad, actually thought the SRT was tuned too.

[Stew]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Slower then a stock 6.1 liter Charger SRT8 running a 2.3 second 60 foot ? That's what I thought. I put bus length on my friend's Charger R/T, he was trapping 99-101 that night(he has I/E).

What is your mod list again? I think we are doing another one of one apples to hamburgers comparisons. Also, you bitching about the price of the JKeep compared to a WRX, a G35 is what 45k compared to a 30k Charger R/T Also the o9+ Charger R/ts should have no problems hitting a high 13, though the MPH is about right, though there a lot of 103s out there. What year was this Charger R/T? 08 or older?

[ESARETEE8]

Originally Posted by SoTHavok

soooooooo back to the thread, i beat the SRT8 from a roll a at 50mph+ wasnt even close. Tune seems to make big difference.

you may continue fighting now

Nice Killl, it was expected. Its hard enough for me to fight off a full bolt on tuned L99 so I couldn't imagine trying to do it on the stock tune. LT's and a Tune bring the L99 to life

[SoTHavok]

Originally Posted by ESARETEE8

Nice Killl, it was expected. Its hard enough for me to fight off a full bolt on tuned L99 so I couldn't imagine trying to do it on the stock tune. LT's and a Tune bring the L99 to life

yess next mod is LT heads

[07-SRT]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Slower then a stock 6.1 liter Charger SRT8 running a 2.3 second 60 foot ? That's what I thought. I put bus length on my friend's Charger R/T, he was trapping 99-101 that night(he has I/E).

He needs the driver mod then.... I pull 2.0x on bald street RSA's( they suck) and still ran a 12.9x... Your not pulling bus lenghts on SRT8's unless idiots are driving them... The R/T that your pulling on is the old 5.7.. The new eagle 5.7 is capable of low 13's... Your not fooling someone you knows Mopars.... Just sayin

[07-SRT]

Originally Posted by SoTHavok

yess next mod is LT heads

Yep.... The Hemi doesn't get as much out of a bolt on as the L99 & LS motors do.....

[08-G35s/6MT]

Originally Posted by 07-SRT

He needs the driver mod then.... I pull 2.0x on bald street RSA's( they suck) and still ran a 12.9x... Your not pulling bus lenghts on SRT8's unless idiots are driving them... The R/T that your pulling on is the old 5.7.. The new eagle 5.7 is capable of low 13's... Your not fooling someone you knows Mopars.... Just sayin

If I did 2.0 or less 60 foot I would be in the 12's, as is if I just put some DR's on it I would be running solid 12's with my trap.

I only have a little port injected 3.5 liter V6 family sedan, those times and trap are much quicker then any stock 5.7 of any year. Aren't V8's supposed to be much faster ? I mean this isn't 1974. I don't even have a tune, just full I/E and driver mods. The DA was 1783 that night by the way, if you are familiar with 1/4 mile, this is key.

[07-SRT]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

If I did 2.0 or less 60 foot I would be in the 12's, as is if I just put some DR's on it I would be running solid 12's with my trap.

I only have a little port injected 3.5 liter V6 family sedan, those times and trap are much quicker then any stock 5.7 of any year. Aren't V8's supposed to be much faster ? I mean this isn't 1974. I don't even have a tune, just full I/E and driver mods. The DA was 1783 that night by the way, if you are familiar with 1/4 mile, this is key.

V8= Faster.... If I was to take your 3.5 and drop it in my 4200lb car, I would be running high 15's and if you drop my 6.1 in your G35 you would be in the 11's... You have to look at the weight, gearing, transmission,aerodynamics, peak hp & tq and don't forget the area under the curve. I know all about DA..... I live in Florida...
If your trapping over 106, then yes you have the edge on the eagle 5.7
I ran against a stock one ( don't recall the DA) he ran 13.20 @ 105.xx

[SRT8Tech]

Originally Posted by 07-SRT

I ran against a stock one ( don't recall the DA) he ran 13.20 @ 105.xx

Hmmmmmmm, now who could have that been.

I believe the DA was like +800 if I recall. Yeah, Both the Eagle 5.7L Challengers I had were running 13.2's stock. I did pull a 106 trap in the Mopar 10 once.

[RCDV]

Originally Posted by MY1STCAMAR0

You'd get smoked by a Jeep SRT8....

I took down an SRT Jeep with tune and exhaust on my SS. He at least had exhaust from what I could hear. He obviously launched better because of the AWD.

[King Sun]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

http://www.jeep.com/hostc/bmo/CUJ201303/models.do

A Jeep SRT8 with NO OPTIONS starts at $60k, can easily get to $70k+.

It's the same speed as a BASE WRX for more then twice the damn price. Complete waste of $. Period.

-This is coming from an owner of previous Jeep products, they are all the usual overpriced Chrysler products.

You think I'm kidding ?
2012 Jeep GC SRT8


2009 Subaru WRX base


Sure there are times out there a few tenths slower and faster for both, but they have the same trap and ET given same track conditions, etc. The WRX will come out on top more in the real world though because not all of us live at sea level, the ECU in the WRX adjusts timing and boost for altitude. The Jeep can't do this since it's N/A. The higher up you go the greater the gap will be between both, in colorado springs the WRX should be a solid .6-.8 and 4-5 mph faster.

Shall we discuss the aftermarket where the 392's ECU has yet to be cracked as well ? The WRX can run 12's with less then $1k in mods, at any altitude.

60k for a jeep???????

[2010redcamaro]

Originally Posted by King Sun

60k for a jeep???????

60k for a zl1 camaro?