![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Quote:
No one is arguing the growl and muscular thunder from a big block or a well tuned LS series engine. However, I would also have to submit that the "whaaaamp" of F1 and other open wheel cars screaming at 12,000 RPM is breathtaking. A well tuned engine that can run at 6,7,8000 or higher RPM can sound melodic, smooth as silk, or just as angry as the low rumble of a good ole V8. It all depends on how the engine is built and engineered. Now, there are engines that will run to 7k, but sound horrible. But you take any of Hondas high performance 4 cylinder engines or any BMW inline 6 up to redline and tell me if they don't sound beautiful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
![]() Drives: trans am Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: suffolk
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
I have a really good feeling that the DI V6 camaro will be very similar to the new V6 mustang - I read somewhere, and I'm sorry I don't remember where, that the average V6 mustang puts 186ish horsepower to the ground, with the manual transmission. Which means its really close to the 210 horsepower figure. But why, then, does the 4th gen v6 camaro put out the same power, at more than a hundred pounds less curb weight, and hit 60 in 2.1 seconds more time (I also read somewhere, and I don't remember where, that 4th gen v6's hit 60 in 8.1 seconds)? Probably because the mustang's power band is right in the gear ratios. And the DI will be right in there with it - albeit much more powerful.
- Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic Last edited by Xanthos; 07-03-2008 at 11:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
Sorry - I should have clarified. I meant similar in that it will be faster than the horsepower numbers would lead us to believe. I'm expecting a least 5 to 5.5 second 0-60 times.
- Xanthos P.S. I actually test drove a new mustang a few weeks back because my fiance is a big mustang fanatic (it was supposed to be her driving, but she wasn't feeling well that day, so she just rode in the passenger seat) and even she thought it was a piece of s***. No, I think the new v6 camaro is going to be an amazing car - there is a reason why I plan on spending my entire enlistment bonus and base pay from my BCT on one.
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
ritired suthern gentlman
Drives: nothing now Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 199
|
That's what I'm hoping for but I think it will have to have more power than the CTS. Apparently, the CTS weighs sub 3900lbs and it does 60 in about 6seconds flat. I don't know, maybe the V6 will weigh 3500-3600 because it's all aluminum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago/Carbondale
Posts: 815
|
I'm all about V8 sound a rumble but im also all about the newest and most modern technology out there so i would have no prob getting the DI V6. Even better, i think this V6 will have a cool sound to it.
__________________
-Tim
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Iroc-Z <3'r
Drives: '87 5.7L Iroc-Z Join Date: May 2008
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
o well. lol
__________________
![]() "Camaro Z/28 is back. Gentlemen, Don't even bother to start your engines." ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | ||
|
PWA Relapse
|
Quote:
- Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Pillaging Viking
|
^Holy...that sounds pretty mean! I mean not quite V( sound yet but damned mean sound on it. I might have to test drive the V6 as well.
__________________
"Fifty years from now, when you're looking back at your life, don't you want to be able to say you had the guts to get in the car?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() Drives: Bowties galore Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 6
|
As time moves on we will all look back on technology. The sound of a V6 to a V8 is distinctive. Times are changing. A 396 is no longer feasible. There will be a time when we will all look back in twenty five years and just absolutley rave about the successes of the V6 and it gas mileage.
I personally am having a struggle with living in the past and trying to recall my 1969 350 ci V8 and all of the good things it was. I am now getting prepared to face the facts those days are long gone. I will embrace the V6 for its power and gas mileage. There is a saying that all things will come to pass. I think the value is there with the V6 and the mileage would be reasonable. If I get real nostalgic I will paint the damn block Chevy Orange. D1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Iroc-Z <3'r
Drives: '87 5.7L Iroc-Z Join Date: May 2008
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
jk of course, I seriously doubt that. but it would be rather interesting... maybe the gov't is just waiting for this muscle car phase to be over with and they're trying to rid it the only way they know how, asap. ![]() it's probably a big conspiracy...yeah..they don't want the car industry to explode into a bajillion muscle cars on the road like the 60's... I personally think that would be the most awesome thing to have many many muscle cars roaring down the road. makes me wish I was alive back in the 60's Just to see that.
__________________
![]() "Camaro Z/28 is back. Gentlemen, Don't even bother to start your engines." ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If there is a conspiracy, it's probably to get rid of SUVs, not muscle cars. The muscle cars just aren't that big of a problem.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios 2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong) 1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Iroc-Z <3'r
Drives: '87 5.7L Iroc-Z Join Date: May 2008
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
That's exactly what they want you to think!! It's all part of the plan...the secret is..SUV's actually get MASSIVE amounts of MPG...you just gotta flip that switch under the gas tank so it moderates the gas consumption more adequately. The government just doesn't want us to know about it..thats why they can drive the black suburbans all day...ever think of that one? ^_^ this is all in jest btw I don't seriously think this way, lol. or do I... 0_o
__________________
![]() "Camaro Z/28 is back. Gentlemen, Don't even bother to start your engines." ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Camaro Could Get This Engine: Pontiac Solstice Coupe to pack 300 horses? | camaro5 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 28 | 05-21-2009 02:29 AM |
| new members opinion on chevy | shelbyGT500 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 18 | 06-24-2008 01:46 AM |
| 300 jobs at the General Motors | KILLER74Z28 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 4 | 01-15-2008 10:30 PM |
| The british opinion | MerF | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 34 | 09-23-2007 05:52 AM |