Has this corona issue affected your job

[95 imp]

Originally Posted by Risky Justice

You can’t keep up because you aren’t trying to. Face coverings reduce transmission rates as long as EVERYONE wears one. N95 masks protect the wearer, period. None of this is new information.

What is so hard to understand? If you need a practical example, try exhaling smoke/vapor with and without a mask on. Or sneezing.

Not Accurate...

The reason people can't keep up is the inaccuracy of all the lies/propaganda being pushed by mass hysteria and ignorant mob coercion.



The majority of masks are worthless. Even the proper masks are being worn improperly and are therefore worthless as well.

Put a hole in a condom and tell me with a straight face that you are at least "partially protected" and that's better than nothing....


Then, even if you ARE wearing the correct mask in a correct manner, what happens when it slips down? You take your dirty, infected finger and thumb and pinch the mask to pull it up. Your dirty finger has now contaminated the inside of the mask.

Do you have a vent in your mask? The intake breath is filtered. When you breathe out, you bypass any filtration and contaminate everyone around you.

Is the mask loosely fit around your mouth and nose? In, or out... Not effective....

Should I go on about the fallacies of actual masks preventing the spread?

[gtfoxy]

Originally Posted by 95 imp

Not Accurate...

The reason people can't keep up is the inaccuracy of all the lies/propaganda being pushed by mass hysteria and ignorant mob coercion.



The majority of masks are worthless. Even the proper masks are being worn improperly and are therefore worthless as well.

Put a hole in a condom and tell me with a straight face that you are at least "partially protected" and that's better than nothing....


Then, even if you ARE wearing the correct mask in a correct manner, what happens when it slips down? You take your dirty, infected finger and thumb and pinch the mask to pull it up. Your dirty finger has now contaminated the inside of the mask.

Do you have a vent in your mask? The intake breath is filtered. When you breathe out, you bypass any filtration and contaminate everyone around you.

Is the mask loosely fit around your mouth and nose? In, or out... Not effective....

Should I go on about the fallacies of actual masks preventing the spread?

All you need to do is look at a “real” infectious disease lab. Fully pressurized body suits are what it takes to prevent contagion spread.

If simple masks worked so great that’s all they would need.

There’s plenty of medical field workers, while wearing even properly treated & preserved N95 masks, that have contracted it.

As for survivability, even our obese (MSM’s own words) 70+ YO president beat this virus. Hell even blubber-butt Chris Christie who has more comorbities than a nursing home didn’t die.

I have two customers that are mid-70’s contract it. They said it was like a mild flu, without the diarrhea & vomiting. Made it through their 2 week quarantine with little issue. I also know 5 other people personally that have had it. They all said the same thing.

And as for the so-called “experts”...

[Silver14]

Originally Posted by 95 imp

Stop with the mob coercion forcing the people who understand the REAL science to play this silly little game were only .27% of the people who contract this flu actually die in the US.

That means IF you actually get it, your chances of surviving are 99.73%

Originally Posted by 95 imp

Yes, sir! I do!

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

225,114 is 2.66% of 8,466,069, not 0.27%.

[gtfoxy]

Originally Posted by Silver14

225,114 is 2.66% of 8,466,069, not 0.27%.

That’s fine & dandy, but you are ignoring the much unknown changes to Morgue reports that if an infection of C19 is listed, regardless of primary cause of death, it is counted as a COVID death.

What is the importance of this you may ask?

The answer is NEVER has this been done, EVER. It skews the number so much that an actual CoD rate can never be known. Only an to say an over-blown rate that can not be compared to any prior, or current, CoD rate.

A coroner I know, of almost 40yrs, said all of the deaths he has seen where COVID was listed on the death certificate the deceased would have lived maybe up to 1.5yrs longer.

[ZED SLED]

Originally Posted by Silver14

225,114 is 2.66% of 8,466,069, not 0.27%.

As was pointed out 2 posts later. Coulda saved yourself some time on the ole calculator app.

[Silver14]

Originally Posted by ZED SLED

As was pointed out 2 posts later. Coulda saved yourself some time on the ole calculator app.

Cool! He didn't provide a source until this page, the #s are from that.

[Silver14]

Originally Posted by gtfoxy

That’s fine & dandy, but you are ignoring the much unknown changes to Morgue reports that if an infection of C19 is listed, regardless of primary cause of death, it is counted as a COVID death.

What is the importance of this you may ask?

The answer is NEVER has this been done, EVER. It skews the number so much that an actual CoD rate can never be known. Only an to say an over-blown rate that can not be compared to any prior, or current, CoD rate.

A coroner I know, of almost 40yrs, said all of the deaths he has seen where COVID was listed on the death certificate the deceased would have lived maybe up to 1.5yrs longer.

LOL, no need to get so excited, I was just pointing out the error in the numbers in case it factors into 95 imp's personal risk mitigation strategy.

[StingrayblueSS]

Originally Posted by Silver14

225,114 is 2.66% of 8,466,069, not 0.27%.

He's using an unknown estimate of how many could have had it without knowing i guess.

[gtfoxy]

Originally Posted by Silver14

LOL, no need to get so excited, I was just pointing out the error in the numbers in case it factors into 95 imp's personal risk mitigation strategy.

I’m not excited, simply stating a fact that is highly hidden and overlooked.

& I was pointing out the futility of all of it.

[95 imp]

Originally Posted by StingrayblueSS

He's using an unknown estimate of how many could have had it without knowing i guess.

I didn't pull the numbers out of my butt. This was an actual study. And THAT study shows 13.9% of random people sampled have antibodies in their system.
This means you can ADD another 13.9% to the "infected and survived" numbers.

So I reduce the number to 10% and that makes it invalid?

[adamsmitt]

Hello. The corona problem did not affect my job much. Now I work in the same mode remotely.

[Carpetguy]

Made my job even busier.

[PeteD]

Originally Posted by bigd1276

CDC numbers. They really try to bury all statistics.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/c...ekly/index.htm

LOL...That is still over 1 million 640 thousand deaths at just half a percent

[95 imp]

Originally Posted by PeteD

LOL...That is still over 1 million 640 thousand deaths at just half a percent

It's a good thing that we are currently at a .26% death rate (and dropping).

Also, Where has your concern been over cancer and heart disease?

Heart disease averages more deaths (by over double) than COVID.

This virus is currently killing about as many people as die during a bad flu season.