Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LFX Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2017, 09:55 PM   #631
willoverkill
 
willoverkill's Avatar
 
Drives: Fast
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nanaimo BC
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Camaro View Post
Derek, has Will done any tuning with the mace cams in a N/A application with the 80 and E-85?
I haven't tuned any MACE cams in an N/A setting, forced induction only, and in those they work very well.

My new-to-me vehicle has a 3L that's basically a debored 3.6, and it uses LLT cams, and I just happen to have a set of LLT MACE cams so anticipate I'll put them in sometime this summer and get the tuning down for N/A (and then boost it)!
willoverkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017, 03:56 AM   #632
Kenny Camaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
Thanks Will, was considering the Mace cams in a N/A set up. Any info would be appreciated.. I know there was not much success prior. Was wondering had you takien a swing at it. Good luck and let us know if you do . Thanks for the reply.
Kenny Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2017, 06:18 PM   #633
tredye
 
Drives: 2012 RS LT convertible
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Norfolk va
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixtyseven View Post
I'm trying to figure this out. Does the supplied spacer plate accomplish this?

"The clamping area is 3.5" versus the 3" area of the stock throttle body, so you may need a new coupling for your intake, or some massaging required."

N/M
I figured it out. The coupling of the intake hose to TB. 3.5"- 3"
Here my LFX emblem
Attached Images
  
tredye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2017, 08:32 PM   #634
gringo
Account Suspended
 
gringo's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro V6
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by willoverkill View Post
I haven't tuned any MACE cams in an N/A setting, forced induction only, and in those they work very well.

My new-to-me vehicle has a 3L that's basically a debored 3.6, and it uses LLT cams, and I just happen to have a set of LLT MACE cams so anticipate I'll put them in sometime this summer and get the tuning down for N/A (and then boost it)!

Any progress on the hard coded WOT restriction until 4k+ rpms on these platforms?
gringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2017, 07:01 AM   #635
Kenny Camaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
Coming soon. A ported version of the Overkill 80 MM Throttlebody!! Yes ,word through the grapevine has it that Will shall soon be offering a ported version of Overkill Throttlebody on the Overkill website!! Get in touch with Will and let him know that you are interested!!
Kenny Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2017, 07:53 PM   #636
Kenny Camaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
The ported Overkill 80mm Throttlebody is becoming a reality. Get in touch with Will for further information!!
Kenny Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2017, 07:13 AM   #637
gringo
Account Suspended
 
gringo's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro V6
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,722
Any progress on the hardcoded "WOT restriction" on our engines?
gringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 05:47 PM   #638
blackswan

 
blackswan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2LT/RS
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,447
Interested!
blackswan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2018, 10:20 PM   #639
Kenny Camaro
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 1LT RS Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 3,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackswan View Post
Interested!
In the 80 or the ported 80? Either way , contact William Rishworth of Overkill Motorsports!! Will is the man!!
Kenny Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2018, 11:58 AM   #640
Gossamer
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 100
so i read thru the 630 posts. Only 3 dyno results and one was from an Impala.

Last year I added the Vmax ported TB, Jacfab spacer, Jacfab ported intake, CAI brand cold air and MRT v2 axle back.

I have an autocal sitting and waiting for nicer weather to try out.

I'm trying to decide if the 80mm throttle assembly is a worthwhile upgrade to what I've already done but cant seem to find any real results on this upgrade over a stock or even one near my existing mods. Not that it's overly expensive and I can sell my vmax easy enough. Just need to make sure it's a worthwhile investment.
Gossamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2018, 05:46 PM   #641
Jazzzed
 
Jazzzed's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro LT
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Fox Lake, IL
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gossamer View Post
so i read thru the 630 posts. Only 3 dyno results and one was from an Impala.

Last year I added the Vmax ported TB, Jacfab spacer, Jacfab ported intake, CAI brand cold air and MRT v2 axle back.

I have an autocal sitting and waiting for nicer weather to try out.

I'm trying to decide if the 80mm throttle assembly is a worthwhile upgrade to what I've already done but cant seem to find any real results on this upgrade over a stock or even one near my existing mods. Not that it's overly expensive and I can sell my vmax easy enough. Just need to make sure it's a worthwhile investment.
I went from the stock TB to the 80mm. There was a small improvement in throttle response at the very instance of the throttle plate opening. A bigger plate allows a little more air through on that initial opening. There is also more overall power when you get on it and have the throttle plate open a decent amount. More air = more power. Those were both noticeable improvements right off the bat. The stock TB will start to bog down a bit at WOT compared to the 80mm which will continue to add power in the higher rpms. But the downside is that the low-mid range of the rpm band suffers with the 80mm compared to the stock TB imo. If you have a daily driver, I think the 72mm gives you better torque down low for zipping around town, and accelerating through turns etc. So each flavor of TB has it's advantages and disadvantages. If you have Kenny hand-port your 80mm, it will enhance both of the positive characteristics I have described. I'm not sure it did much for the low mids. I currently use a VTC to smooth out the rpm band with my 80mm. That works pretty well, but I also have to have the VTC set pretty high to do that. I have an automatic too, so that doesn't help.


These are just my opinions based on butt dyno analysis only.
__________________
Jazzzed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 11:55 AM   #642
Gossamer
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzzed View Post
I went from the stock TB to the 80mm. There was a small improvement in throttle response at the very instance of the throttle plate opening. A bigger plate allows a little more air through on that initial opening. There is also more overall power when you get on it and have the throttle plate open a decent amount. More air = more power. Those were both noticeable improvements right off the bat. The stock TB will start to bog down a bit at WOT compared to the 80mm which will continue to add power in the higher rpms. But the downside is that the low-mid range of the rpm band suffers with the 80mm compared to the stock TB imo. If you have a daily driver, I think the 72mm gives you better torque down low for zipping around town, and accelerating through turns etc. So each flavor of TB has it's advantages and disadvantages. If you have Kenny hand-port your 80mm, it will enhance both of the positive characteristics I have described. I'm not sure it did much for the low mids. I currently use a VTC to smooth out the rpm band with my 80mm. That works pretty well, but I also have to have the VTC set pretty high to do that. I have an automatic too, so that doesn't help.


These are just my opinions based on butt dyno analysis only.

thanks for the reply, so it seems that it's not enough of an upgrade over my 72mm ported throttle to justify the costs.
Gossamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 12:29 PM   #643
DSX_Camaro

 
DSX_Camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SW 2LT/RS LFX/AY6
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,741
I dunno. I went from a ported 72 to the 80mm and it definitely moves more air but it isn't something you can really compare peak numbers about. A bigger TB will allow more air to move so more power can be made, but if you aren't going to go boost, the gains are debatable. I also had every bolt on possible when I swapped TB and have had a few tune revisions so I have stout linear power at all points PLUS 3.45 gears.

Less about power, more about power potential. Kinda like stock 72 vs ported 72. It probably won't show peak gains so most people will write it off.
__________________
K&N CAI, 1LE Strut Tower Brace, Elite Engineering Catch Can and Clean Side Separator, Apex Scoop w/ Washer Relocation Kit, CTS Front Calipers and Rotors, JacFab Ported Intake Manifold, JacFab Intake Manifold Spacer, 80mm Overkill Throttle Body, SS Brake Lines, Ideal Garage Master Cylinder, Monster Twin Disc Clutch, NPP Retrofit w/ Magnaflow Resonated X, ARH Catless Downpipes, JRE Built 3.45 Diff, 1LE Axles, 1LE Hubs, Overkill Tuned, BMR Anti Wheel-hop Kit Stage I, ACS TL1 Hood Insert, ZL1 Spoiler
DSX_Camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 04:03 PM   #644
Jazzzed
 
Jazzzed's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro LT
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Fox Lake, IL
Posts: 393
Yeah, when you're talking about whether the cost incurred is worth it, its very subjective so its hard to say. One thing I noticed after I posted is that Gossamer has a convertible. One thing I would say is to not underestimate the high pitch whistle described in this thread. It is very irritating, and I can't imagine dealing with that with your vert top down. In order to get rid of it, you have to open up the inlet of your manifold to match the 80mm diameter of the TB. The whistle is cause by high velocity air being reflected off the throttle plate right into the plastic lip of the manifold that overhangs into the 80mm adapter when you haven't ported the inlet to match. So imo, that would be an additional cost you would eventually end up ponying up for.
__________________
Jazzzed is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.