![]() |
|
|
#57 | |
|
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,441
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
VIN #2G1FT1EW6A9100074
|
Quote:
BUT, looking at the page put up by RPO, it distinctly shows constraints being put up against the V6s. Someone still needs to explain to me how he, or anyone, can bypass those and actually have a V6 RETAIL order pulled... SEE HERE
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Dodge Charger / 2SS IOM Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,640
|
The reason for the constraint is because of the dealer show cars, the definition of constraint is "to force by imposed stricture, restriction, or limitation". So while they are building the dealers v6 there is a limitation on how many sold v6’s they are making. Constraint does not mean stop
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
SoCal MAYHEM
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
VIN #2G1FT1EW6A9100074
|
Never said it did. Simply said someone like RPO who has a March allocation can't override the system and order a V6 if his first priority number was a V6 instead of his 8th.
So to say the V6 isn't somehow constrained (i.e. a dealer can somehow actually order one that he sold) is totally confusing.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Dodge Charger / 2SS IOM Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,640
|
i guess everybody will really find out the turth on March 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
VIN #2G1FT1EW6A9100074
|
Agreed. It is really all speculation until then. I didn't say I didn't trust what Fbodfather said- I 100% do. It's just that there is absolutely no confirmation of it yet and that's what's causing the "discomfort" and issues we see.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Senior Member
Drives: 2010 SS/RS, '06 350Z Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: So. Maryland
Posts: 2,326
|
Whaaaat, Scotty, it's NOT a gift horse?
Quote:
Hey, trm, remember, we're gettin' SS's, we don't have to care so much about the V6ers.
__________________
2SS/RS - Black/Black - CGM Rally Stripes - Auto - VIN 10171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
VIN #2G1FT1EW6A9100074
|
Quote:
![]() They are every bit as much Camaro enthusiasts as we are, just "underfunded" at this particular point in their lives. I was there once too.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |||
|
Sage of Thread Killing
Drives: IBM Tumbler Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne Beach, FL
Posts: 2,362
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." Abraham Lincoln Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
VIN #2G1FT1EW6A9100074
|
Quote:
Hopefully we'll see a whole bunch of V6s eligible to be pulled on 3/15; but right now, it appears they are not.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 05:38 PM |
| Good News.... Bad News.. | ralyrat | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 4 | 02-22-2009 07:05 PM |
| Edmunds.com review of Holden Commodore... good info. | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 07-23-2007 07:49 PM |
| Good News Boys and Girls | Freedom07 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 45 | 01-31-2007 11:08 AM |
| Crash tests downgrade small cars | KILLER74Z28 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 0 | 12-19-2006 04:31 AM |