![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
|
Quote:
Honestly, most of the name brand after market kits I've personally seen on many differently configured Camaros fit just fine... Unless they were installed improperly, which really isn't a fault of the mfg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Come on, don't get an exhaust with silly tips and poor fitment. Most the quality exhausts out there look way better than stock and fit great. And the stock mufflers are over sized, very heavy, and don't look good hanging down behind the car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
No offense but my picky and your car show picky are worlds apart. I've fitted all of the stuff you mentioned on three different cars and not one was perfect side to side. But my idea of perfect fit is measured in 32nds and with a square and level. I'll be the first to call my level of picky borderline OCD but that's just how I roll. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
|
That's not borderline. If you're measuring exhaust alignment to 32nds of an inch, then you'll not be satisfied with much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
Well so far I've tried all the GM and Borla stuff as well as SLP. The GMPP tips are grapefruit launchers, the Borlas look like reduced grapefruit launchers and the SLP although having nice tips had silly hangers. I dispise Corsa, won't touch Flowmaster and coldn't be given most others. That and I don't go for loud = fast and the de-accel popping drives me nuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Car Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Place
Posts: 3,361
|
Dude... Good luck with all that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
So easy to love Camaros
|
I dumped the stock system and went with Dynomax 3" diameter cat back with Bullet straight through mufflers.
Absolutely love the sound, the quality was great and it was an easy install.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 149
|
Is there any sound difference between an Axle back and a Catback?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS/CGM/6M/Black stripes Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Napa
Posts: 141
|
True, stock mufflers are over sized and ugly but they are aerodynamic. They reduce drag under the car. When you remove them you have two air scoops. I remember reading a muffler delete with lower 1/4 mile times. He had increased drag, thus slower times. What we need is a diffuser that fills in the scoops when there is an exhuast upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
![]() Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Rally Yellow w/ blk Join Date: May 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 398
|
So... if I was looking to get Long tubes to make a few HP while having a good aggressive muscle car sound would the catback or axleback be more beneficial?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|