09-21-2013, 12:57 PM | #57 | |
Drives: 2011 2ss/rs Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Jacksonville, fl
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
09-21-2013, 02:40 PM | #58 | |
Drives: 2011 2ss/rs Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Jacksonville, fl
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
I agree with that and the times you quote as well. i just wanted to clarify that it wasnt the engine that made it slower as opposed to the weight difference here's a run not too long after i got my car it does have a cam swap in this vid but as per the numbers you quoted you will see the mph reflect the power increase. it has no cai or any other mods except a tune http://youtu.be/UVxxkqNbLX4 as you can see i had a miserable 60' ( around 2.1-2.2) but it picked up on the big end. subtract 400-500 lbs and what would that run have been? better yet the stall shaved off close to a half second. Im simply saying that that engine imo was badass. it was just installed in a 4 door tank. |
|
09-21-2013, 05:12 PM | #59 | |
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
I have my boys this weekend.......next sat or sun works for me. Text me
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE |
|
09-22-2013, 04:55 PM | #60 |
Drives: 2012 SS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NorCal
Posts: 818
|
Saw a Challenger RT at the track this week running low 14's, stock SS's were running 13.50's.
__________________
Buttonwillow 2:23.736
Sacramento Raceway 12.89 at 112 mph Thunderhill 2:22.242 |
09-22-2013, 05:25 PM | #61 | |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
Quote:
|
|
09-22-2013, 06:00 PM | #62 |
chevy pride
|
headers , tune intake was a good race for a 2012 srt8 . i would pull him slightly. the 6.1 is no where close to the 6.4 and the 5.7 is a dog all around.
lt1 camaro territory vs a 5.7
__________________
check out ky speeds fb page https://www.facebook.com/kyspeed |
09-24-2013, 04:18 PM | #63 |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
I don't remember any MAGS getting 13.5-13.6 from the LT1 like most did from the manual R/T and I don't remember any stock LT1s hitting 13.2s like some auto R/Ts have don't. Don't confuse car ability with driver ability........
|
09-25-2013, 02:10 AM | #64 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
On what planet are R/Ts running low 13s? They can barely even run a mid 13...
|
09-25-2013, 08:41 AM | #65 | |
Drives: Alot Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
|
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2013, 08:42 AM | #66 |
Drives: Alot Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
|
|
09-25-2013, 09:26 AM | #67 |
SRT and SS
Drives: 08' Jeep SRT8 / 13' 2SS Conv. Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 209
|
As an owner of a JGC SRT8 only car that has genuinely surprised me was a new 5.0 mustang, guy ran a low low 11 with few more tweaks he was in tens easy with bolt ons, no F/I. Just so you know though, the stock 392 aren't that great until they are tuned by someone who knows what they are doing, after that they are absolute monsters.
|
09-25-2013, 09:47 AM | #68 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2013, 07:44 PM | #69 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 09:20 AM | #70 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|