![]() |
|
|
#57 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
Quote:
I definitely. don't see how a the sports car looking refresh helped the the camaro that was Retroed after the most sought after year camaro! But everyone has their opinion because I don't think that the refresh more mainstream back has more character or goes with the round and curvy back! The front has more going which I don't have a problem with but it's more of a sports car look than a pony or muscle car look! So I got what I wanted and you got yours! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
|
I think with all 3 of these cars many assumptions are being made as far as what has made them a success. I think too much credit is being given to "retro" styling, the Camaro was always the least retro of the 3 and with the 2014 model year changes it moved even further away from "retro" and yet thus far this is the 5th generations best year yet. At its current pace it is looking to get really close to 100,000 sales mark (though likely to hit about 90,000 going through the slower months).
Honestly I feel that "retro" has very limited success/market appeal as you have a group of people who want it and being older has the income at launch. The retro sales have shown to in many cases exhaust themselves after roughly 2 years of a vehicle being on market. After that vehicles have to sell on their own merits, that is what the 2014 has more of that the 2010 model year didn't have as much. For those who retro doesn't have as great of an appeal the 2014 has a much better exterior design front and back. The interior still needs a good deal of work however it gets the job done (really the drawback here is the materials). The 1LE package is another part of what really sets the Camaro apart from its competitors (the Mustang and Challenger) and with the design enhancements of 2014 looks even more killer. What really kept the Camaro afloat in model year 3 and model year 4 were new packages as well as improvements. For example the 2012 model year got the LFX V-6 engine and things like the ZL1 came out then the 1LE and now we have the Z/28 Camaro. Also a rebounding US car market had the impact of lifting all boats, I feel without that the 2012 and 2013 model years would have dipped down a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,071
|
Quote:
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic '15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo '14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic '25 Silverado 1500 High Country 6.2L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
HTML Code:
[HTML] Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
![]() Drives: 69Z,92Ragtop,96SS Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 16
|
The '14 refresh shows a good move....little tweaks I wanted are changed...that is why I will only get a '14 + as my 5th gen...Thanks Team Camaro...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
General Motors Aficionado
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
|
The 2014 interior is almost completely carried over from the 2012/2013 models.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
![]() Drives: 2014 1LT Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() Drives: 2014 1LT Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
HTML Code:
[HTML] Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
Quote:
Correct! But most ppl wait and see how everything works like the mylink because everyone wished that the Camaro. had a touch screen . But GM was having a little bit of problems with the mylink but I didn't care or even used the mylink when I had my 2013 . Personally I think that there are better after market touch screens! Plus it seems like GM let you Nick and pick your packages for the 14 year! But the refresh does look more aggressive in the front. ānd it still have the 5th Gen body! For me the 60's look is what I wanted! Some ppl want Retro , some want a more modern look. Which is where the world is going less grill I.e. a sqinty front . The Toyota corolla grill and 14 5th gen grill and headlights are very simillar. I guess l smaller is what ppl want!. So they willl sell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
General Motors Aficionado
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
|
Are you for freaking real?
![]() You're grasping at straws at this point.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
|
hahaha..... a 14. owner had went and looked at the Toyota corolla front after I said the samething and said that it was crazy that he never noticed how similar it looks it is.So sorry! Not pulling or reaching.It's where the world is going and more options are better!
Last edited by Q'smuscle; 08-07-2014 at 11:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
General Motors Aficionado
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
|
You're saying that people waited TWO WHOLE YEARS to decide to buy a Camaro based on wanting MyLink's kinks to be worked out?
The '14 exterior refresh was a success. End of story. Sales figures prove it.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|