Does the Camaro NEED Nav?? - Page 5 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

nettesvette · 05-29-2008, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MerF

Whoa caps.

I don't understand the correlation between HUD and NAV though. Vettes (and some Pontiacs) have had HUD for years without NAV.

I have 2007 Corvette Coupe, with HUD (Head Up Display), I opted to not have nav, but 6 disc, in dash, changer. I agree Nav systems are a waste of space and money.

TonytheTiger · 05-29-2008, 11:55 PM

I KNOW WHERE WAL-MART IS SHUT UP B**CH. I don't think it will look good with a nav and i think navs are a waste i hope they don't try to squeeze one in.

MerF · 05-30-2008, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonytheTiger

I KNOW WHERE WAL-MART IS SHUT UP B**CH.

<---- 9th grade is that way.

Sphinx002 · 05-30-2008, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MerF

<---- 9th grade is that way.

Emher · 05-30-2008, 10:22 AM

You know I realised after I voted that while I think that it will have nav but that I don't want it that I was...actually not being truthful there. If it comes with nav standard or nicely integrated I'll take it. What I don't want is a big LCD screen mucking up my dasboard. I don't generally need nav for finding my way around but they do have one great purpose: speed camera warning.

*The_Blur* · 05-30-2008, 10:31 PM

We've been told a thousand times how great this car is going to be. I expect GM is so confident because the Camaro will contain the best parts available for the class that GM intends to dominate with our next pony car. At the same time, using the best equipment means the cost will skyrocket with every option due to the need to perpetuate those options for every car. Have you ever noticed that cars without all of the options still have button placements on the dash or plastic inserts where the console should be plain? Every car needs to be made ready for options, making the process to make the car longer and the expense higher. As a result of top model Camaros having every option from navigation to a HUD available, bottom end Camaros will cost more. Additionally, GM has to keep these products in stock in case of a warranty replacement, driving up the expense of those being installed. If nav screens are installed in some Camaros, GM has to pay Garmin to build thousands of extra units that must be stored in a facility that costs GM money to use. That all gets covered by the price of the car.

In summary, navigation is a cool feature, but it is expensive for owners and non-owners. In effect, I would recommend GM only consider navigation at the expense of another unnecessary option. As rumor has it, the Camaro will already feature a large ensemble of GMPP options, in addition to sunroofs, a convertible, a high-performance model that may require a different engine and suspension setup, vinyl packages, and a large number of unique interior components—old-style seat belts, for instance—that will not likely appear in other cars. All of these existing options will make a cheap Camaro a tight squeeze for a car company that has faced billions in losses as a result of strikes this year. Offering navigation just doesn't make sense if GM intends to keep the price tag low. At the same time, though, I'd be delighted to see GM prove me wrong.

storm79 · 05-31-2008, 06:51 PM

i dont think gm will put a nav screen in...i think they are trying to get more people to use on-star turn by turn navigation...and i think it's a good idea because if there is a screen it could become a distraction where with the on-star it's just one button and you get hands free driving so yeah i doubt it

View Poll Results: Will the Camaro have NAV/Does it need to have NAV?
Yes/Yes - It will have a NAV system and Needs One	26	23.42%
Yes/No - It will have a NAV system but does not Need One	43	38.74%
No/Yes - It will not have a NAV system but Needs One	13	11.71%
No/No - It will not have a NAV system and does not Need One	29	26.13%
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

05-30-2008, 10:31 PM	#62
The_Blur Moderator Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 14,768	We've been told a thousand times how great this car is going to be. I expect GM is so confident because the Camaro will contain the best parts available for the class that GM intends to dominate with our next pony car. At the same time, using the best equipment means the cost will skyrocket with every option due to the need to perpetuate those options for every car. Have you ever noticed that cars without all of the options still have button placements on the dash or plastic inserts where the console should be plain? Every car needs to be made ready for options, making the process to make the car longer and the expense higher. As a result of top model Camaros having every option from navigation to a HUD available, bottom end Camaros will cost more. Additionally, GM has to keep these products in stock in case of a warranty replacement, driving up the expense of those being installed. If nav screens are installed in some Camaros, GM has to pay Garmin to build thousands of extra units that must be stored in a facility that costs GM money to use. That all gets covered by the price of the car. In summary, navigation is a cool feature, but it is expensive for owners and non-owners. In effect, I would recommend GM only consider navigation at the expense of another unnecessary option. As rumor has it, the Camaro will already feature a large ensemble of GMPP options, in addition to sunroofs, a convertible, a high-performance model that may require a different engine and suspension setup, vinyl packages, and a large number of unique interior components—old-style seat belts, for instance—that will not likely appear in other cars. All of these existing options will make a cheap Camaro a tight squeeze for a car company that has faced billions in losses as a result of strikes this year. Offering navigation just doesn't make sense if GM intends to keep the price tag low. At the same time, though, I'd be delighted to see GM prove me wrong. __________________ RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet// Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban

05-31-2008, 06:51 PM	#63
storm79 Drives: 2007 GMC Sierra Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Middle of nowhere Posts: 281	i dont think gm will put a nav screen in...i think they are trying to get more people to use on-star turn by turn navigation...and i think it's a good idea because if there is a screen it could become a distraction where with the on-star it's just one button and you get hands free driving so yeah i doubt it __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview	Moose	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	11	04-04-2012 07:10 PM
GM memo to dealers	Moose	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	41	02-04-2010 08:33 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release	Tran	Camaro Convertible Forum	12	11-18-2009 08:05 PM
Camaro (concept) Press Release!!	Pencil.Fight	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	4	07-21-2008 04:33 PM
Q&A with fbodfather (Scott Settlemire) regarding upcoming Camaro	JustinZS	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	22	05-20-2008 08:48 PM

05-29-2008, 11:55 PM	#58
TonytheTiger Drives: 1999 camaro rs Join Date: May 2008 Location: phoenix, arizona Posts: 1,160	I KNOW WHERE WAL-MART IS SHUT UP B**CH. I don't think it will look good with a nav and i think navs are a waste i hope they don't try to squeeze one in.

05-30-2008, 10:22 AM	#61
Emher Pillaging Viking Drives: Saab 9-5 '99 (Hey it's a GM!) Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Sweden Posts: 1,189	You know I realised after I voted that while I think that it will have nav but that I don't want it that I was...actually not being truthful there. If it comes with nav standard or nicely integrated I'll take it. What I don't want is a big LCD screen mucking up my dasboard. I don't generally need nav for finding my way around but they do have one great purpose: speed camera warning.