The "WildZL1" Build Journey

[FasNuf]

Dyno on 93 octane?

[FasNuf]

Originally Posted by Vicster

Hello My Friend,
Hope all is going well for you! How is your fuel upgrade going?

It is 92 octane boosted to 103, I looked and searched for reliable 85% but unable to find it. It is easier to just carry a few quarts of Boostane around with me.

I hope you put your vote in!

Hey Vic, all is good except waiting for parts to finish the upgrade.
I'll put my best guess in.

[FasNuf]

Originally Posted by Vicster

Hello My Friend,

It is 92 octane boosted to 103, I looked and searched for reliable 85% but unable to find it. It is easier to just carry a few quarts of Boostane around with me.

I hope you put your vote in!

Hope all is going well for you! How is your fuel upgrade going? You may want to consider this piece.
https://www.amazon.com/40T-Performan.../dp/B08PFCDHHN

LOL, I just re-saw your post but this time with the Flex sensor bypass. I saw those and considered it but I think it might be a little overkill on my system. Time will tell. My flex sensor is going on the return side of the regulator back to the tank so I'm hoping the flow restriction won't amount to too much disruption.
Have you been following my Instagram or something? LOL

[Ashen 6.2]

Looking forward to seeing the results. Even more so with the 427!! lol

[FasNuf]

Originally Posted by Vicster

You should be okay with the sensor on the return side, I pull up your YouTube site and see what you are up to here on Camaro5.

Yea, won’t matter what side as long as it’s not a restriction. It’s a return system so that’s an advantage. It’s going to be a while before I get the YouTube videos up about the fuel. So far I’m on part 9 LOL

[morepowerjoe]

Uh oh. I hope you guys are OK.

[FasNuf]

I'm not sure you were out of fuel. Your Inj. DC was 82% at 6066 RPM. I suppose at 6500 it couldve peaked but I cant see that. Did you buy the credit to flash the FPCM?

[FasNuf]

Great numbers for only pump gas Vic. Sounds real nice.

[FasNuf]

I'm sending you a PM

[FasNuf]

From my calculations, you did well buddy!
Currently this is setup to mock the DynoJet. Mustang is available.

[morepowerjoe]

Very impressive Vic. I'm just wondering what you would have made if not for the belt slippage. Seems like it had a little more left in it.

[FasNuf]

It should be fairly accurate as long as the car was in 4th gear, tire diameter is stock height and the rearend ratio is 3.73:1

[eLeSthree]

Originally Posted by Vicster

Does the Dyno Dynamics dyno read low?
The Dyno Dynamics is known throughout the industry as being the "heartbreaker" dyno - because it breaks the heart of every man that thinks he has 500 hp when he really has 350. The Dyno Dynamics reads lower than the Mustang. It reads WAY lower than a Dynojet.

When Ken told me it reads lower I did not think it was that bad...

How do I compare my pulls to Mustang Dyno, or a Dynojet, or a Dynapack? Every dyno is different. If you want dynojet or mustang-ish #s you have to multiply by 1.18 or so, 1.25+ for DynaPack. But remember, this is just ballpark, as it is not linear.
(So to make it linear we divide by .82%)

So, Mustang dyno is 15% lower and the Dyno Dynamics is 18% lower than a a DynoJet dyno. So the math look something like this?
(So to make it linear we divide by .82%)

765/.82=933 (equals Dynojet dyno)
So if I was to run my car on a DynoJet dyno my HP at the wheels would be 933hp.

Then to get crank HP I need to multiply by 1.15% for drivetrain losses.
(So to make it linear we divide by .85%)
933/.85=1,098
So if I was to run my car on a DynoJet dyno my HP at the crank would be 1,098hp.

So even if the numbers are off, it is still Freakin AWESOME!!!!!

So the Winner of my poll is 1COR.1:18 at 1,100hp at the crank, send me a PM with your E-mail address and I will send you a $25.00 Amazon gift card! Thanks for Voting!

I am sure someone will have more to input on my numbers, please feel free, all I ask is that you include how or why you came to your conclusion.

The dyno difference info was taken from:
https://www.m5board.com/threads/inte...dynojet.95056/

My research on the web supports these numbers as being the most consistent.

.

Hey Vic, I love your optimism, but i think you're reaching here.

If you want to know what it would make on a dynojet, well then put it on a dynojet. I dyno'd HIGHER on both a mustang dyno and a Land and Sea Dyno-mite dyno. Search the internet and they will tell you both of those dynos read lower. Guess what, they were wrong. On that given day, using the correct weather station and correction factor, the dyno jet read LOWER. and even lower yet using SAE.

You have a beautiful build going (2 actually), and I'm sure your 427 with a 2650 will easily make 1000+whp, but not this one. I will have to respectfully disagree with the BMW M5 forum math. All I can share is my own personally real experience.

Curious though... even if you did make 933whp, why the thread title reads Exceeded 1000whp?

[FasNuf]

The best practice on any dyno is to get a baseline number before mods, then after the build, get the new HP on the same dyno The same atmospheric conditions as the baseline run would help consistency. The delta is what we're all really going for.