![]() |
|
|
#71 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
Just wow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 V-Sport/ 2015 Escalade Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 939
|
Its whatever you like, and I am glad chevy caters to both crowds. I consider anything that does not have a clutch and you don't row the gears to be a auto. I don't care how advanced it is, your still not using your right hand and left foot. I totally understand the flabby paddles such as the PDK, the Getrag and dual clutch autos are advanced, but the computer is still working the clutch not you. I also think its sad people feel the ZL1s auto is junk and can't compare to euro/japanese ones. The new ZL1 auto is quite advanced and not the regular run of the mill tapshift like in say my old 300C or current L99 SS. I guess the ZL1 auto has to prove its self like the ZL1 has at the Ring to be spoken in the same breath as a BMW or Nissian.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 IOM Vin #169 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,953
|
GM was smart to invest some more R & D to make sure the auto version would hold up and keep a warranty. I'm just happy they offer both transmissions for us to choose from. Every one has there reasons for picking one over the other. If I had the funds I would get one of each. This car is going to be a classic either way.
My 77 Trans Am was a stick My 87 Grand National was an auto (only came that way, but was alot of fun) My ZL1 (year ??? ![]() ![]() ![]() ) stick Lets just be understanding of ones choices
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: xxx Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: xxx
Posts: 389
|
I find some of these posts funny.
Some of the same people that defend the ZL1 vs the GT-500 by quoting faster ring times say they choose the automatic because it is faster in the 1/4. It was a manual on the ring. So which is "faster"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Status "Thank You!" Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 2,498
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Love the one you're with Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
|
The ZL1 is not a sports car. It makes complete sense to offer an automatic. Besides the public demanded it and GM complied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
2016 Challenger Hellcat
Drives: 2016 Challenger Hellcat Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
Just curious, since you're coming off as being so hard core, why I didn't see your name in any of the quarter mile listings. I would hate to think that you're talking the talk without walking the walk. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...19&postcount=2
__________________
2016 Challenger Hellcat.....2016 Corvette Z06
2015 Corvette Z/51.....2014 Charger SRT 2013 Ford Mustang GT.....2009 Pontiac G8 GXP 2009 Corvette Coupe.....2005 Pontiac GTO 1995 Camaro.....1989 Mustang GT 1987 Mustang GT.....1985 Camaro 1976 455 Trans-Am.....1973 Mustang Mach 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
![]() |
They demanded it because most people do not know how to drive stick. I believe at early conception, it was only going to be manual. So GM decided to help the auto guys out knowing that most cannot drive stick to tweak the autos. GM is not stupid, they know where most of the sales are going to come from. I think this is sad. Man up, learn how to drive stick so we can keep the manuals alive and keep the autos a step under the manuals like it should be. Pansies!! And sir, the ZL1 is not a sports car? What is it then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,580
|
I'll answer why they offer a manual. So when the manual guy gets spanked by the auto guy, he can use the excuse that he missed a gear or the clutch is slipping. Auto is faster, all real gear heads know this. I don't see any people at the track with a manual unless it's slow. A manual is fun in a civic. And auto belongs in fast cars. Everyone I know that has a fast car (10.99 or faster) has an auto and if it came with a manual, they did a swap to an auto and went faster. I have a buddy that has a rx7 with an ls1 engine in it that runs 9.60's @ 144 mph. He has an auto. He had a six speed and that pos wouldn't hold up and kept breaking. Couldn't get into the 9's with it either. Put a turbo 400 in it, went faster. Now he ways to drive it more so I'm currently building him a 4l60e for it with every upgrade you can buy. And I bet it'll go even faster with the 4l60.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires. SOLD :(
2000 1500 silverado extra cab SOLD :( 2017 Silverado 5.3 all stock 2004 5.7 GTO 78mm turbo |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6 Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
|
What is it with manual guys thinking it's not a true sports car if it's an automatic? That's just ridiculous. Then I hear an auto is cheating at the races? Really? There are still a lot of things going on when you launch an auto that if aren't just so, will kill your time and possibly lose the race.
I can tell you this though, of all the manuals I've raced to date with similar or even a little more HP, I hands down whip them everytime. I'm not saying a manual is a bad choice, but like others have said, when it comes to racing, a auto is the only way to fly! Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6 Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6 Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|