Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2014, 09:32 AM   #99
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by DietCoke View Post
Yes, that is 100% correct. However as they aren't part of the driveline, you don't see the same reciprocating weight benefits as you do from reducing driveline rotating mass.
Maybe this logic will make more sense. If you have X amount of energy to use and you make a part more efficient the reaction of that is more energy can be applied somewhere else. Meaning more useable power.

Never mind... keep on going as you are.
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:36 AM   #100
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Bfast us L99'ers swap in lighter torque converters. I'd be interested in a lighter driveshaft but they are like $1000 I'm personally not that hardcore about this car.

I've personally raced for 20 years have gone low 9's and crewed for a car that has gone 7.22@200. Definitely look for ways to reduce weight every way possible. And these cars start off so heavy that they initially one of the most inefficient cars to race.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:36 AM   #101
grocerygetter
instigator
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
I actually see both of your points. lol
__________________
-John S.
grocerygetter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:42 AM   #102
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
Bfast us L99'ers swap in lighter torque converters. I'd be interested in a lighter driveshaft but they are like $1000 I'm personally not that hardcore about this car.

I've personally raced for 20 years have gone low 9's and crewed for a car that has gone 7.22@200. Definitely look for ways to reduce weight every way possible. And these cars start off so heavy that they initially one of the most inefficient cars to race.
I agree a 4000lb Camaro is no race car or a 3200lb Camaro for that matter. My point to this whole thing was there is more beneficial ways to get the most out of weight reduction.
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:45 AM   #103
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
This is my current project... Shooting for .399 or better 1/8th. Should be fun!
Attached Images
 
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:49 AM   #104
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Yeah it's all good. But for a M6 you swap in a lighter clutch and flywheel, well, good luck with that in a stock weight car.

Common sense is do easy weight reduction first, and then spend money. I'd do lighter rotors for the right price.

So a friend about my weight drove the car over to the Beech Bend scales and said it was 4175 with him in it.

Per my weight post a few pages ago, 3980 early last summer. I'll hit some scales again when I swap my 18's back on front and back, but I think even before installing this light battery, I'm going to hit 3870-3900. Let's say 3900. 4175-3900 = 275 lbs. That's from wheels, tires, exhaust, removing some little stuff from the car, no mats, no stuff in the trunk.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 09:50 AM   #105
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Nice, BBC? Quickest we went in the 1/8 was 4.6 but I think he''ll dip into the 4.5's this year and maybe a very high 4.4 by the end of the year.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 12:30 PM   #106
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
Nice, BBC? Quickest we went in the 1/8 was 4.6 but I think he''ll dip into the 4.5's this year and maybe a very high 4.4 by the end of the year.
Yes, 740" with a pair of split dominators and 6 stages of gas. It's been a journey.
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 01:29 PM   #107
DietCoke
Slow Turtle
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 1SS
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 1,123
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
It's going to be a boatload of fun when you're done. BBNOS is the way to go for durable power.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 01:54 PM   #108
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Thought BB twin turbo would be more durable.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 03:59 PM   #109
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
Thought BB twin turbo would be more durable.
Almost went that route but the max CI for our class with TT's is 565 and in my area the summer is pretty brutal heat wise so we went with the gas instead.
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 04:49 PM   #110
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Yeah seems like nitrous runs good in the summer too based on an outlaw class we ran last year.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2014, 05:49 PM   #111
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
Yeah seems like nitrous runs good in the summer too based on an outlaw class we ran last year.
You got it!
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2014, 02:13 PM   #112
Anaconda
 
Anaconda's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1SS 6-speed VR
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere nice and cool
Posts: 303
As far as suspension components, what is everyone going with to help reduce weight? Functionality is of course important and design but weight is a little plus. I know that Pfadt is now out of the picture and they had some good designs and what drew me to them as well was their attention to decreased weight. I've been trying to look for another option suspension wise to help decrease weight. I personally don't really want to give up some creature comforts so I will try with whatever option I can get.
__________________
2013 Victory Red 1SS 6-speed w/ black stripes ordered 8/15/12
Delivered 10/2/2012!
Corsa ZL1 catback exhaust, Black CAI intake with scoop and washer bottle relocation
Anaconda is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official 1/8 Mile (V8) 2010+ Camaro Fast List Merc Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion 763 08-12-2022 04:51 PM
Cost-Effective Camaro Weight Reduction CamaroFemme 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 34 12-21-2010 10:52 PM
weight reduction options 2K05GT Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 24 12-18-2010 08:05 AM
weight loss CamaroSpike23 Off-topic Discussions 8 09-17-2009 07:16 PM
Camaro Weight JeepinMatt 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 62 03-26-2008 09:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.