Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2010, 12:18 PM   #99
Jessika
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Anything Blown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
Ok, so I plugged it all into my handy dandy calculator.

a 1900 would be spun @ 18,600 rpms @ 6800 redline rpm. With a stock balancer size & an overdriven rear pulley setup. (I used serpentine 10 rib rear pulleys) Of course the calculation would be off depending on redline.

Also, another thing to keep in mind is that to acheive that, a ~3.2 must be ran on the front and that may require a 8 rib setup. So then you have the option of going to an overdriven 8" crank... so lots of options.

Yes, the 1900 will work just fine at 10lbs of boost & 6800 redline
if you know that you are not going to want to go bigger, then this should be ok.
Jessika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 03:52 PM   #100
bluegoat05
 
Drives: 2005 GTO
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
so what is the diffence in an 8 rib design and a 10 rib? are there different variations of pulley size for each 8 or 10 rib? and is that ten psi on a stock engine or the cammed full exhaust engine? and why would you only be able to us an 8 with a 3.2 front pulley? sorry for all the questions im just trying to understand fully.
bluegoat05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:23 PM   #101
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluegoat05 View Post
so what is the diffence in an 8 rib design and a 10 rib? are there different variations of pulley size for each 8 or 10 rib? and is that ten psi on a stock engine or the cammed full exhaust engine? and why would you only be able to us an 8 with a 3.2 front pulley? sorry for all the questions im just trying to understand fully.
You can probably get a 2300 for about the same money as a 1900 plus upgraded pulleys. What are your power goals....now, and future?
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:37 PM   #102
BlkSlvrdo129
 
Drives: 2008 Silverado
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluegoat05 View Post
so what is the diffence in an 8 rib design and a 10 rib? are there different variations of pulley size for each 8 or 10 rib? and is that ten psi on a stock engine or the cammed full exhaust engine? and why would you only be able to us an 8 with a 3.2 front pulley? sorry for all the questions im just trying to understand fully.
10 rib is the size of the pulleys on the back of the blower I think. The faster you spin the blower (with a smaller front pulley) the more likely it is you'll have belt slip, so going from a stock 6-rib to an 8-rib gives the belt more surface area to grip.
BlkSlvrdo129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:50 PM   #103
bluegoat05
 
Drives: 2005 GTO
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
You can probably get a 2300 for about the same money as a 1900 plus upgraded pulleys. What are your power goals....now, and future?
well truth be told my car now is just a stock gto with full exhaust w/ stock cats and an intake. putting 355 rwhp. but next summer im planning to do a heads and cam setup which should put down 450 rwhp. then further down the line as money comes in i will do forged internals beef up the drive train and then put a blower on it.. my goal is around 650-700 rwhp.. I know im a big dreamer but i think my ls2 can pull that off with around 8-10 psi, guesstimated. and this will be some years down the road but that is the plan and i like to get all my facts in order.
bluegoat05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:54 PM   #104
Jessika
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Anything Blown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
we make 6 rib pulleys is just about all .1 increments from 4.1" to 2.8"
our 8 rib pulleys are only 3.2-3.0 and 2.8
our 10 rib pulleys are only 3.2 and 2.8

More ribs = more traction = no slippage at higher RPMs.
I believe the Camaro systems experience slippage with the 6 ribs at smaller than a 3.6" pulley with the 2300 and the 1900 would probably be about 3.4' or so.

I think that if you are are above 650crank hp, then just go with the 2300...
Jessika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:56 PM   #105
Jessika
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Anything Blown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
You can probably get a 2300 for about the same money as a 1900 plus upgraded pulleys. What are your power goals....now, and future?
Its not really about the money IMO, both are expensive...
but if you go with a blower too big, then you will hurt the bottom end... not extensively, but it will be slower off the line than the smaller setup.
You can also look at the point that the car with the larger blower will have better traction off the line because of that lag...

Its really just splitting hairs at this point.
Jessika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 04:57 PM   #106
VegasNateG8
 
VegasNateG8's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
You can probably get a 2300 for about the same money as a 1900 plus upgraded pulleys. What are your power goals....now, and future?
I agree with this and then you can't look back and say " I should have gotten the 2300 " I've seen it happen....fun either way though!
__________________
2008 Pontiac G8 GT, HSV conversion, AirRex Digital Suspension, LSX 427, ported LSA supercharger, maybe a little NOS......
VegasNateG8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 05:07 PM   #107
Jessika
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Anything Blown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
8 ribbed... omg you crack me up nate... <3
Jessika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 05:18 PM   #108
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkSlvrdo129 View Post
10 rib is the size of the pulleys on the back of the blower I think. The faster you spin the blower (with a smaller front pulley) the more likely it is you'll have belt slip, so going from a stock 6-rib to an 8-rib gives the belt more surface area to grip.
You're going to see slip on the front end before you see it on the back. When folks talk of going from 6 to 8 to 10rib, they're talking about the serp. belt and the pulleys on the front of the motor. You can spend more than a few bucks there. With the 2300, there's no need for pulley upgrades if you're good with 650rwhp and you're set up is "right".
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 05:23 PM   #109
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluegoat05 View Post
well truth be told my car now is just a stock gto with full exhaust w/ stock cats and an intake. putting 355 rwhp. but next summer im planning to do a heads and cam setup which should put down 450 rwhp. then further down the line as money comes in i will do forged internals beef up the drive train and then put a blower on it.. my goal is around 650-700 rwhp.. I know im a big dreamer but i think my ls2 can pull that off with around 8-10 psi, guesstimated. and this will be some years down the road but that is the plan and i like to get all my facts in order.
Then you've got no business even considering a 1900. 650rwhp can be done with good heads on an LS2 with blower cam and 2300. I wouldn't try that will a 1900.
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2010, 05:34 PM   #110
bluegoat05
 
Drives: 2005 GTO
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by old motorhead View Post
Then you've got no business even considering a 1900. 650rwhp can be done with good heads on an LS2 with blower cam and 2300. I wouldn't try that will a 1900.
haha sweet that is all i need to know
bluegoat05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 01:46 AM   #111
2010SSRSM6


 
2010SSRSM6's Avatar
 
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,553
Will the 2300 even work with the LS2? I thought those required eiither a MP112 or MP 122?
__________________
UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......
2010SSRSM6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2010, 08:06 AM   #112
Jessika
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Anything Blown
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010SSRSM6 View Post
Will the 2300 even work with the LS2? I thought those required eiither a MP112 or MP 122?
Yup, it's just not carb legal


Sent from my amazing and awesome iPhone4
Jessika is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro Charger or TVS 2300 Maggie! taz Forced Induction - V8 63 02-14-2010 04:19 AM
G-FORCE TVS 2300 2010 Camaro w a little suprise! Mike TexaSS Forced Induction - V8 23 02-08-2010 10:37 PM
Bumblebeecamaro gets supercharged by a Maggie TVS 2300 (plenty of pics inside) bumblebeecamaro Forced Induction - V8 10 01-14-2010 11:11 PM
I want to get a TVS 2300 but I need some (engine) comforting... bumblebeecamaro Forced Induction - V8 25 01-04-2010 07:25 PM
MP 2300 vs TVS 2300 Carlos Garza Forced Induction - V8 25 12-17-2009 12:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.