![]() |
|
|
#99 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
Ok, so I plugged it all into my handy dandy calculator.
a 1900 would be spun @ 18,600 rpms @ 6800 redline rpm. With a stock balancer size & an overdriven rear pulley setup. (I used serpentine 10 rib rear pulleys) Of course the calculation would be off depending on redline. Also, another thing to keep in mind is that to acheive that, a ~3.2 must be ran on the front and that may require a 8 rib setup. So then you have the option of going to an overdriven 8" crank... so lots of options. Yes, the 1900 will work just fine at 10lbs of boost & 6800 redline if you know that you are not going to want to go bigger, then this should be ok. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
![]() Drives: 2005 GTO Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
|
so what is the diffence in an 8 rib design and a 10 rib? are there different variations of pulley size for each 8 or 10 rib? and is that ten psi on a stock engine or the cammed full exhaust engine? and why would you only be able to us an 8 with a 3.2 front pulley? sorry for all the questions im just trying to understand fully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
![]() Drives: 2008 Silverado Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
![]() Drives: 2005 GTO Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
|
well truth be told my car now is just a stock gto with full exhaust w/ stock cats and an intake. putting 355 rwhp. but next summer im planning to do a heads and cam setup which should put down 450 rwhp. then further down the line as money comes in i will do forged internals beef up the drive train and then put a blower on it.. my goal is around 650-700 rwhp.. I know im a big dreamer but i think my ls2 can pull that off with around 8-10 psi, guesstimated. and this will be some years down the road but that is the plan and i like to get all my facts in order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
we make 6 rib pulleys is just about all .1 increments from 4.1" to 2.8"
our 8 rib pulleys are only 3.2-3.0 and 2.8 our 10 rib pulleys are only 3.2 and 2.8 More ribs = more traction = no slippage at higher RPMs. I believe the Camaro systems experience slippage with the 6 ribs at smaller than a 3.6" pulley with the 2300 and the 1900 would probably be about 3.4' or so. I think that if you are are above 650crank hp, then just go with the 2300... |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
Quote:
but if you go with a blower too big, then you will hurt the bottom end... not extensively, but it will be slower off the line than the smaller setup. You can also look at the point that the car with the larger blower will have better traction off the line because of that lag... Its really just splitting hairs at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
![]() Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
__________________
2008 Pontiac G8 GT, HSV conversion, AirRex Digital Suspension, LSX 427, ported LSA supercharger, maybe a little NOS......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
8 ribbed... omg you crack me up nate... <3
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
You're going to see slip on the front end before you see it on the back. When folks talk of going from 6 to 8 to 10rib, they're talking about the serp. belt and the pulleys on the front of the motor. You can spend more than a few bucks there. With the 2300, there's no need for pulley upgrades if you're good with 650rwhp and you're set up is "right".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
![]() Drives: 2005 GTO Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage. Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,553
|
Will the 2300 even work with the LS2? I thought those required eiither a MP112 or MP 122?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pro Charger or TVS 2300 Maggie! | taz | Forced Induction - V8 | 63 | 02-14-2010 04:19 AM |
| G-FORCE TVS 2300 2010 Camaro w a little suprise! | Mike TexaSS | Forced Induction - V8 | 23 | 02-08-2010 10:37 PM |
| Bumblebeecamaro gets supercharged by a Maggie TVS 2300 (plenty of pics inside) | bumblebeecamaro | Forced Induction - V8 | 10 | 01-14-2010 11:11 PM |
| I want to get a TVS 2300 but I need some (engine) comforting... | bumblebeecamaro | Forced Induction - V8 | 25 | 01-04-2010 07:25 PM |
| MP 2300 vs TVS 2300 | Carlos Garza | Forced Induction - V8 | 25 | 12-17-2009 12:13 PM |