Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2016, 04:53 PM   #1205
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Yes, smaller pulley sizes will increase boost in all the areas. At 7000 I'm around 14, at 6000 it's 10 roughly. Boost will build earlier the smaller the pulley, but the faster it spins there is more heat. Eventually the supercharger becomes a heat pump and so much timing is being pulled that the engine makes less power. My 3.125 pulley makes a lot of heat up top, the 3.33" was a good compromise.

I'm looking at the throttle body because I think the 72mm body flows 938 cfm, they Vortech spinning at my levels is around 1050.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 05:00 PM   #1206
DGM
 
DGM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1LS - Ashen Gray
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 588
would a change from 3.40 to 3.33 show a noticeable boost increase? are you running stock ipf air filter or larger - im curious if its a restriction with smaller pulleys
__________________
"WIDOW" Overkill Edition w/Mace Cams,80mm tb,Jacfab spacer/ported intake,Alky Control,ARH off road pipes,SOLO custom system,3.91 gears, MGW,Phantom grilles,ZL1 appearance pkge, 3dCarbon vents, Lingenfelter hood and spoiler, PLX boost/wideband modules/gauge,ZL1 fuel pump,LF3 hpfp,DSS aluminum driveshaft,JPSS sway bars, Z28 replica wheels and CxRacing coilovers..
DGM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 05:40 PM   #1207
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGM View Post
would a change from 3.40 to 3.33 show a noticeable boost increase? are you running stock ipf air filter or larger - im curious if its a restriction with smaller pulleys
Maybe 0.5 PSI, that is all it seems. Still running the stock IPF Air Filter, I'm looking after doing the throttle body at putting a longer air filter in but using a 3.5" pipe. The IPF Filter is in the best location, just don't know about the length of the filter.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 10:44 PM   #1208
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
What are the dimensions on the stock filter?
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 10:50 PM   #1209
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
What are the dimensions on the stock filter?
4" flange, 6" base, 6" height, 4" top diameter.

http://www.airaid.com/search/product.aspx?prod=701-455
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 11:26 PM   #1210
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
How much room do you have to go longer? Keeping the 4" flange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2016, 11:39 PM   #1211
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
How much room do you have to go longer? Keeping the 4" flange?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
None, the top of the filter is hitting the bottom of the fascia. What I would need to do is take the 3.5" silicon elbow on the supercharger inlet and add a filter that is 3.5" flange there. But this would also require the line from the bypass valve to the supercharger inlet to be replaced with a small filter.

The intake tube is 3.5" at the supercharger elbow, then expands to 4" where the MAF sensor is and then the filter. Since I don't use the MAF there anymore I can just use a straight 3.5" tube. Probably won't be a big difference, but I've heard that Centrifugal Superchargers are greatly affected by intake restrictions.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 12:25 AM   #1212
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
IPF Camaro V6 vs Procharger Mustang V6 (Soon)

I understand what you're up to now... I've read the same... It would be a shame to put a restriction on there...

I'd love to try out a bigger version of the flat panel adapter I built for a go kart...



Go figure as soon as I get it done the people I was helping out decide to quit racing and sell all their kart crap right before we could dyno it... The one on the left has about 7x less filter surface area, but flowed 3.5% more than the filter on the right (yes, I removed the wrapper on the filter lol)

Play around with it. But yeah, the easy route would just be the 3.5" tube with a filter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 11:45 AM   #1213
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Kind of wonder if I can put that flat panel filter facing the lower front grill, get some good air flow there. The problem with the current filter is that part of it is against the wheel liner. Problem is there isn't much room in the front, or anywhere on the car. I would have to take some measurements to see how much room I have to work with.

Also the new throttle body cleared customs and will be here today. I'm way behind on getting the car back together, it has been very cold here lately. Will see if I can at least hook it up and if the computer can move the throttle blade itself.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 03:02 PM   #1214
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
This throttle body is a lot bigger in person. Hoping this works.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 03:34 PM   #1215
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Code P1551 - Throttle Valve Rest Position Not Reached During Learn

I can turn that code off, without the engine running both the throttle bodies were reading the same position with the same throttle input.

Pedal - Throttle
0% - 5%
10% - 7%
20% - 10%
30% - 15%
40% - 21%
50% - 30%
60% - 40%
70% - 52%
80% - 68%
90% - 91%
100% - 99%

Will get the car back together now and start it up, see if it will at least run with the new throttle body and work from there.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 05:45 PM   #1216
HeritageLS
 
HeritageLS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 1LS Camaro (Victory Red)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 372
IPF Camaro V6 vs Procharger Mustang V6 (Soon)

That new TB looks massive in the picture. Patiently waiting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HeritageLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2016, 08:48 PM   #1217
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Throttle body installed on my LFX intake manifold, has an O-Ring built into the throttle body so no silicone required. No clearance issues, only small problem is the wiring harness goes through 2 connector. If this fully works the small details can be worked out.

Right now it is too cold to start the car, under 20 degrees the supercharger clearance becomes so tight it can damage it. Tomorrow I should be able to start it and see if it works at idle.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2016, 09:29 PM   #1218
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Well, started the car up with the bigger throttle body, it idled. At first it sounded like I had a huge cam in it till the idle calmed down, so my DAL's are off at start up it looks like. Couldn't do much more because I couldn't see my widebands, no power to the sensors.

Did get 2 codes:
P0122 - Throttle/Pedal Position Sensor A Circuit Low
P0223 - Throttle/Pedal Position Sensor/Switch B Circuit High

I let Will know the codes, see what he says. Might be a simple pin swap.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.