09-01-2017, 04:55 PM | #15 |
Banned
Drives: 17 SuperSport Camaro 6 on the Flo' Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
|
Chevy still continues to fail to run exciting aggressive performance TV ads. Maybe not PC and they think they will offend the PC ECO crowd.
|
09-01-2017, 05:42 PM | #16 |
GM has to get their price point closer to the mustang and I bet Camaro will beat the mustang in sales then. Talked to new mustang owners and they said a big reason why they got one was it was cheaper
|
|
09-01-2017, 06:04 PM | #17 |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
|
09-01-2017, 06:08 PM | #18 |
Drives: too many Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: oh va pa ma tx
Posts: 3,046
|
Oya keep sinking
__________________
|
09-01-2017, 10:34 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: CT
Posts: 9
|
Everyone is running to buy a challenger kittycat. I want a kittycat, but lack skill to handle 707 ponies.
|
09-01-2017, 10:43 PM | #20 |
Camaro6 2016-2018
Drives: sometimes Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,450
|
er thanks for that.
i'm pretty sure most challengers sales are not 'kittycats' |
09-01-2017, 10:45 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
|
Hellcats are not selling which is why the price has come down so much on them.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
09-02-2017, 06:52 AM | #22 | |
|
Quote:
Snapshot of retail sales and ATP's for August and YTD. Camaro retail sales for August up from July and all three saw ATP's dip slightly. Camaro still ahead YTD both sales and ATP. Retail ATP's August 2017 (JDPin) Camaro: $39,019 Challenger: $36,427 Mustang: $34,365 Retail Sales August 2017 Camaro: 4,866 Challenger: 3,939 Mustang: 3,819 Retail ATP's YTD 2017 (JDPin) Camaro: $39,943 Challenger: $37,296 Mustang: $35,847 Retail Sales YTD 2017 Camaro: 43,130 Mustang: 38,754 Challenger: 31,427 Dodge is fleet dumping at record pace. I've never seen it this high. FoMoCo is over 30% fleet across the company with Lincoln in the high 20% range. Going to be a rough year for FoMoCo and FCA.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
09-02-2017, 07:38 AM | #23 | |
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
Thanks for the info. Fleets sales of 37% for Challenger (2,314 units) and 3% for Camaro (151 units).
Quote:
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
|
09-02-2017, 07:49 AM | #24 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1SS, 6spd, black, FAST! Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Augusta, Ga
Posts: 6
|
In my opinion, the Camaro is the better car of the three. There is no comparison really.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS, 6spd, Black w/ Gray Rally Stripes. Options: Power Sunroof, Active Exhaust, Mosaic Black Metallic Paint.
|
09-02-2017, 08:19 AM | #25 | ||
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
Quote:
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
||
09-02-2017, 08:32 AM | #26 |
Drives: 17 SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,920
|
|
09-02-2017, 11:57 AM | #27 |
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :) Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
|
Thanks for the figures @Medisin , that gives us a good picture of what the ordinary consumer is going after. Camaro is up by 900 sales in that retail category. Not that it matters to me, but for those who suspect it has no appeal(M6G), etc....
As for Dodge, they have done a good job of asserting themselves to be the 'true' muscle car and it's showing, I see these scat pack/srt cars everywhere, a lot of them younger owners too. I'm not into the Chally but do find the Charger appealing. I wonder what chassis these scat packs are riding on? I know it's that mercedes platform, but is SRT doing any tuning or adding any parts? These cars would lose appeal to me if they don't have feedback of the road or a planted ride. I've been a passenger in an R/T and Scat Pack. The R/T felt odd, you couldn't really feel the road, it felt like you were floating on a frame. Go drive a base ford focus and you'll understand what I mean. Don't remember much about the Scat, it felt better but still not planted/stiff enough for my taste. I definitely see the value in the Scat Pack, especially with incentives. But the suspension/chassis would be a deal-breaker for me, along with reliability. |
09-03-2017, 06:45 AM | #28 | |
Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|