Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2010, 12:54 PM   #1
firengnred
 
firengnred's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS, 2006 2500 Silverado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Torrance, Ca.
Posts: 682
Question about back pressure and torque

So here's the deal..... I ordered the Magnaflow Comp. Series Axle Back exhaust and perforated X-Pipe to replace stock L-99 system. After receiving and installing, sound was awesome and torque was definitely increased. I was loving it. Then I found out I had been sent a dual straight through muffler instead of the perforated X-Pipe. Contacted retailer and they sent me the correct muffler and paid for the shop to swap out the wrong muffler. What a disappointing difference. Now the car sounds barely better than stock and has lost the torque it had with the other muffler.

Now someone correct me if I'm wrong. I understand back pressure helps with torque and I believe that is why I could feel more torque with the straight through muffler. No crossover meant more back pressure and more torque. But now that I have the X-Pipe crossover, less back pressure so less torque. The only mods are the exhaust and Super chips tune. I intend to put on a CAI Inc intake which should be arriving this week and eventually a maggie. Undecided about LTH as I live in Ca.

So my question is, can I expect the torque to return with the intake swap, as this will allow more air in to build more back pressure? Is there a real advantage to the X-Pipe vs the straight through? I know the maggie will give me LOADS of torque but could it be more with the straight through? I guess what I'm getting at is, should I keep the X-Pipe or the straight through?
__________________

"Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Choose your words, for they become actions. Understand your actions, for they become habits. Study your habits, for they will become your character. Develop your character, for it becomes your destiny."

Last edited by firengnred; 02-18-2010 at 10:43 AM.
firengnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 01:18 PM   #2
2ndgenz28
Thread Killer
 
2ndgenz28's Avatar
 
Drives: All Black
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NWO Toledo Area
Posts: 4,720
Send a message via ICQ to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via AIM to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via Yahoo to 2ndgenz28
I prefer straight, years of self experimenting with every different car I ever owned and many different engines has that kind of set up installed on everything I own.
2ndgenz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 01:57 PM   #3
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
I think your car just seemed faster because it was louder. I dought you would gain or lose any HP on a dyno. And I'm sure your car would run the same times at the track with each setup.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 02:11 PM   #4
firengnred
 
firengnred's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS, 2006 2500 Silverado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Torrance, Ca.
Posts: 682
You are correct about it being louder but it definitely had more torque. launches were much more forceful. You could certainly feel the difference.
__________________

"Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Choose your words, for they become actions. Understand your actions, for they become habits. Study your habits, for they will become your character. Develop your character, for it becomes your destiny."
firengnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 09:29 PM   #5
Johnwayne
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport, MS/ St. Louis, MO
Posts: 185
i concur
Johnwayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 12:13 AM   #6
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Backpressure making torque is a myth. In reality, the Xpipe should have been the part that made more HP since it aids in scavenging exhaust. The more air you run through the motor, the more HP you'll make. I concur with SGO in that noise will definitely heighten your butt-o-meter.

If you don't believe, look at Jannety's LT thread. He tested 1 3/4, 1 7/8, and 2in headers, all the same manufacturer. The 2in headers made the most HP AND Tq.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 05:26 PM   #7
toehead93


 
Drives: 2014 2SS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: wpb fl
Posts: 3,136
if you really were making more torque it probably had more to do with air temp than the muffler. If the the intake air temp increases then the ECM pulls timing. Even if the outside air temp is the same you can see higher IATs just from idling.
__________________
Used Racing Brake 2 Peice Rotors for sale:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344754

Summit White 2014 2SS 1LE
Recaros, NPP exhaust, Nav
2010 2SS A6 - sold.
toehead93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 06:52 PM   #8
4xchamp
MURC 666
 
4xchamp's Avatar
 
Drives: 69 Pace Car 68 Camaro Restomod 81 Z
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New England , U.S.A.
Posts: 480
I don't believe a stock LS3 would see any significant gain from changing the exhaust . In my experience changes of this sort help modified high reving motors . The stock pipes are ok .
My LS3 is presently bone stock . One of my friends bought an L99 , he tells me his $1200 exhaust added 35 hp , his $ 400 cai added 30 hp , $200 pulleys 10 hp and finally the $400 tuner for 25 hp . He says thats 100 hp for $2200 bucks . Can it really be that easy I ask ?
We finally played a little and I edged him every time .
I'd love to see unbiased dyno tests on various modifications and I bet most aren't worth chit .
To see real gains you need cam , blower and cubic inches .
__________________
Guys hoarding their Camaros are depriving some youngster the opportunity to restore it 25 years from now .
Drive it like you stole it , let the next guy baby it !
4xchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 07:22 PM   #9
wbt
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
Backpressure making torque is a myth. In reality, the Xpipe should have been the part that made more HP since it aids in scavenging exhaust. The more air you run through the motor, the more HP you'll make. I concur with SGO in that noise will definitely heighten your butt-o-meter.

If you don't believe, look at Jannety's LT thread. He tested 1 3/4, 1 7/8, and 2in headers, all the same manufacturer. The 2in headers made the most HP AND Tq.
^^^Man knows what he is talking about^^^
wbt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 10:42 AM   #10
firengnred
 
firengnred's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS, 2006 2500 Silverado
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Torrance, Ca.
Posts: 682
bump
__________________

"Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Choose your words, for they become actions. Understand your actions, for they become habits. Study your habits, for they will become your character. Develop your character, for it becomes your destiny."
firengnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2010, 08:27 PM   #11
Roger Ramjet
Motor Head
 
Roger Ramjet's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So MD
Posts: 494
I believe the straight through muffler made more torque during launch. And, I believe the X muffler would make more high RPM horsepower. All this has to do with organ pipe theory and the reflected pressure waves in the exhaust system. The straight muffler creates long wave lower frequency pulses which will boost cylinder pressure below the camshaft dictated peak torque airflow. I would expect this to be most noticeable 1000 RPM below peak torque. Max torque for a L99 is 4300 RPM. So, the straight exhaust should be most effective below 3300 RPM. With the factory tune Torque Management active below 3000 RPM the torque improvement would be undetectable. But this car has been tuned (Torque Management reduced) so the low RPM improvement should be noticeable.
__________________
History Camaro's: 83, 93, 95, 98, & 10.
Roger Ramjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 08:20 AM   #12
flyby

 
Drives: 2010 Silver SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glen Gardner, NJ
Posts: 1,336
Many people have changed types of axle backs from the stock which includes the mufflers. On the dyno no difference. The engine is a glorified air pump. The more air you flow through the more hp it is just that simple.
flyby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 08:23 AM   #13
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,769
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyby View Post
Many people have changed types of axle backs from the stock which includes the mufflers. On the dyno no difference. The engine is a glorified air pump. The more air you flow through the more hp it is just that simple.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ZZ Motorsports needs your opinion ZZcamaro 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 62 03-23-2010 05:32 PM
COLOR SELECTION WITH MEMBER'S OPINION Mikamaro 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 33 11-23-2009 04:55 PM
Can we please stop with the other car forum opinion threads? Angrybird 12 Off-topic Discussions 25 03-20-2009 09:47 PM
Need opinion about interior card21doc Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions 5 12-21-2008 01:59 PM
Give me your opinion! Xanthos Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions 13 08-07-2008 12:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.