12-16-2008, 04:32 PM | #99 | |
Future Camaro Driver.
Drives: 2009 Escape/2007 Ridgeline Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northeastern, PA (Poconos)
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
__________________
Automatics don't suck. I can flip you off and change gears at the same time.
|
|
12-16-2008, 08:22 PM | #100 |
Drives: Everywhere Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
|
I'm going to be completely honest and say I have not read all the post here and only wanted to add a comment because this thread seems to just keep dragging on(no offence intended). But have any of you priced a sat nav update disc? 400 bones! And all the while your getting turn by turn for free with the on-star. I mean no disrespect I just dont think the sat nav that great a loss for the average consumer we are discussing above.
p.s. I u guys so please don't kill me. |
12-16-2008, 09:52 PM | #101 | |
Drives: 2002 Nissan Altima Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,048
|
Quote:
I actually really like the Camaro's interior design, i just wish we could also have real aluminum instead of all the painted plastic, faux aluminum that the Camaro's interior has. I'm not really fond of the fake stuff. |
|
12-16-2008, 09:58 PM | #102 | |
Future Camaro Driver.
Drives: 2009 Escape/2007 Ridgeline Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northeastern, PA (Poconos)
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
First satellite navigation disk do not cost $400. My father has a Honda with a factory installed navigation and the replacement disk only cost $150. This is directly from the notice he got from Honda informing him where to buy the disk. He had the vehicle for nearly 2 1/2 years and hasn't updated the disk since because the maps are still accurate. Second, On Star turn by turn is not free at all. You might get the first year free, but after that it cost $300 a year. For $300 a year all you get is a voice telling you where to turn. No visual prompts on a big, colored, easy to read screen like factory installed navigation systems. Please get your facts straight before posting, we have plenty of in dash navigation haters here and they will believe any misinformation/lie about the in dash systems as long as it's negative.
__________________
Automatics don't suck. I can flip you off and change gears at the same time.
|
|
12-17-2008, 12:28 AM | #103 |
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 633
|
Many people can do without the nav disk updates anyway - I know I can. I think it's a bit pointless to defend GM on excluding this, an option like this is pretty standard on most cars today. My only hope is that they change their mind and offer something better than the On Star in late 2009 like a few of the reports said.
|
12-17-2008, 02:44 PM | #104 |
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
|
Gotta have GPS. It makes long drives much more enjoyable.
I will probably junk the goofy Onstar junk asap, I'll probably also mod the center panel to take a good aftermarket GPS nav/radio system. I've got a Pioneer AVIC D-3 in my '00 MX-5/Miata and I have the factory MMS media/nav in my '08 Audi. I'm too used to having it to not want a non-hang-on model in any new car I buy from here on. It really don't cost that much to opdate the data base every three years or so. I only did it once in the six years I owned my previous Jaguar. On initial review, it looks like maybe a double DIN radio with touch screen might fit in the center panel with some careful changes to only a few things. That part's not too good looking as it is so it could use some improvement anyway. Don't need/won't pay for Sat radio in any case. |
12-17-2008, 05:00 PM | #105 | ||
Future Camaro Driver.
Drives: 2009 Escape/2007 Ridgeline Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northeastern, PA (Poconos)
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Automatics don't suck. I can flip you off and change gears at the same time.
|
||
12-17-2008, 05:19 PM | #106 | |
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
But, since they mandate Onstar, which I don't even want at all and even supply Sirrus/XM, which could care less about and certainly wouldn't pay for ether, I am more than willing (and certainly able) to change out a radio, even one that probably requires a little modification to the dash to get rid of. If it really is impossible, they can keep the new Camaro till they change that. |
|
12-17-2008, 05:24 PM | #107 | |
Future Camaro Driver.
Drives: 2009 Escape/2007 Ridgeline Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northeastern, PA (Poconos)
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
__________________
Automatics don't suck. I can flip you off and change gears at the same time.
|
|
12-17-2008, 05:40 PM | #108 | |
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
But, I'd rather have the integrated, in-dash NAV/multi-media system than a theft motivating, marginally capable hang-on unit like a Garmin or a Tom Tom. I would pay $2,000 for an integrated unit. I wouldn't pay $300 for a hand-held. I already own a hand-held unit for aviation use and I sure as hell wouldn't want to put up with all that 'hang-on' misery in a car. If they had the GPS and integrated it into the HUD, then we could say they have something... |
|
12-17-2008, 05:44 PM | #109 | |
Drives: 2008 Audi A4 3.2 MT S Line Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
If it's too difficult, I'll just wait or chose a different ride. Maybe they'll make the interior a little more attractive on the next time around anyway. Looks a bit plasticky at the moment. But, compared to the typical GM model, it is better than most. Maybe 'better' is going to be too much to hope for. Even the Corvette interior has been the cheapest part of the car for a long time now. |
|
12-18-2008, 07:53 AM | #110 | |
Drives: Everywhere Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
|
Quote:
Between 300-400 bones buddy. Maybe you should do your own research instead of comparing a Honda to GM. You should try not to insult a person you have never met for no reason. I was just stating my opinion in the rest of my post so ease off. |
|
12-18-2008, 09:33 AM | #111 | |
Quote:
25976806 2009 NA CORV/GP/STS/9-5 North America $199.00 |
||
12-18-2008, 10:38 AM | #112 | ||
Future Camaro Driver.
Drives: 2009 Escape/2007 Ridgeline Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northeastern, PA (Poconos)
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
Even if you can get the aftermarket unit in without wiring issues it might not look too visually appealing. Personally it's not worth the hassle, I hope in the next model year they just add the option. It's easier to hand them the $2k and tell them I want a factory navigation system. Quote:
BTW, yes I am right to be harsh since you failed to state the expense of On Star's navigation system and what it lacks. Next time you make an argument you should state all the facts, not just the facts you find most appealing. In dash navigation systems are overpriced, but they give you a lot more than On Star and tack on navigation systems can. Thank you for proving Robert's point moot. I tried to do some research and couldn't find any information on the price of new GM navigation disk, unless you buy on E-Bay. It seems they only give you that information if you're an owner.
__________________
Automatics don't suck. I can flip you off and change gears at the same time.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRUZE gets nav. but not camaro???? | 2010_5thgen | Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum | 37 | 11-09-2008 02:29 PM |
Ordering a car i've never seen in person or sat in | LT1Jeep | Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions | 22 | 10-29-2008 09:17 PM |
I sat in the Dodge Challenger R/T | rray200 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 15 | 10-28-2008 04:09 PM |
Dealer said order deadline/cutoff this Sat....please read! | 350 HRSS | Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions | 38 | 10-22-2008 04:53 PM |
Does the Camaro NEED Nav?? | BigZAJ | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 62 | 05-31-2008 05:51 PM |