Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2014, 08:20 AM   #43
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
OK guys. This was brought to my attention the other day. Seems the internet is full of professional engine builders anymore. I want to debunk a few "facts" in here.

First, on a street driven car turning 7K CB clearance is not a huge issue. I have a .650 lift cam with duration in the 240 range. I am .150" from coil bind and I turn 6,800 quite often. So this 0.060" from bind is not true. Every engine and combo is different. Some engine love well over 0.100" from bind were others love to be .040" from bind. There is no set height that is end all for all applications.

Second, if you think the 1208X has too much load, you are dead wrong. There are plenty of guys with over 500lbs over the nose on stock style rocker arms. Load does not kill trunnions it is the RPM. If you want to run big lift on a stock rocker then you need to address the geometry of that rocker.

So to say the spring load destroyed your valve train is not true. there is more than likely an underlying root cause. All you the professional key board engine builders think you know more than a company like lethal or BES? Come on, they both have a proven record of high end lasting power.

TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 09:11 AM   #44
litle88
V8 Lounge member #2
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Ws6
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burbank,IL
Posts: 6,373
So it's brought to your attention and your here to tell us that some "engines" love certain coil binds? And that spring pressures are irrelevant?

Yea your here to kill a myth.

Thanks.
__________________
2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.
litle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 09:29 AM   #45
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by litle88 View Post
So it's brought to your attention and your here to tell us that some "engines" love certain coil binds? And that spring pressures are irrelevant?

Yea your here to kill a myth.

Thanks.
Let's see here, I believe the Myth is your springs need to be at 0.060" cb no matter what. Seems to be the consensus of the keyboard jockeys. Second. Over 400lbs is not going to kill valves and trunnions. So yes, I am here to kill a myth.
TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 09:37 AM   #46
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
So what is killing the valve tips even when rockers aren't failed if its not related to spring pressure?

We have numerous 7000+ rpm combos on stock rockers, so I'd be willing to say rpm alone is not the culprit of premature valve tip wear.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 09:46 AM   #47
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
So what is killing the valve tips even when rockers aren't failed if its not related to spring pressure?

We have numerous 7000+ rpm combos on stock rockers, so I'd be willing to say rpm alone is not the culprit of premature valve tip wear.
How much lift? Are you having valve bounce? Correct wipe pattern?
TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 09:53 AM   #48
SolomonAKOO

 
SolomonAKOO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,210
__________________
1 7/8" TSP headers straight piped, Custom Tick Performance cam w/ supporting mods, 1" BMR springs and other BMR suspension mods. Tuned with HPtuners by Matt@FSP
SolomonAKOO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 10:03 AM   #49
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuick6 View Post
OK guys. This was brought to my attention the other day. Seems the internet is full of professional engine builders anymore. I want to debunk a few "facts" in here.

First, on a street driven car turning 7K CB clearance is not a huge issue. I have a .650 lift cam with duration in the 240 range. I am .150" from coil bind and I turn 6,800 quite often. So this 0.060" from bind is not true. Every engine and combo is different. Some engine love well over 0.100" from bind were others love to be .040" from bind. There is no set height that is end all for all applications.

Second, if you think the 1208X has too much load, you are dead wrong. There are plenty of guys with over 500lbs over the nose on stock style rocker arms. Load does not kill trunnions it is the RPM. If you want to run big lift on a stock rocker then you need to address the geometry of that rocker.

So to say the spring load destroyed your valve train is not true. there is more than likely an underlying root cause. All you the professional key board engine builders think you know more than a company like lethal or BES? Come on, they both have a proven record of high end lasting power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuick6 View Post
Let's see here, I believe the Myth is your springs need to be at 0.060" cb no matter what. Seems to be the consensus of the keyboard jockeys. Second. Over 400lbs is not going to kill valves and trunnions. So yes, I am here to kill a myth.
I wonder why my knuckles are so banged up from typing? I must be doing it wrong.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 10:20 AM   #50
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuick6 View Post
How much lift? Are you having valve bounce? Correct wipe pattern?
On my setups or the setups that have valve tip wear?
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 10:25 AM   #51
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
On my setups or the setups that have valve tip wear?
that have valve tip wear.
TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 12:48 PM   #52
376LS3
Eh, that'll happen
 
376LS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
And who are you supposed to be that we just bend over and accept what you say as the word of God? You come in here telling us that some of the most respected builders on this site are wrong, and you don't give us any introduction to who you are or give us anything that shows you're credible. Are you an engine builder, do you manufacture springs, or a nut swinger? Give us something that shows we should give you the light of day.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
376LS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 12:54 PM   #53
realcanuk
 
realcanuk's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Corvette C6 983 RWHP
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuick6 View Post
OK guys. This was brought to my attention the other day. Seems the internet is full of professional engine builders anymore. I want to debunk a few "facts" in here.

First, on a street driven car turning 7K CB clearance is not a huge issue. I have a .650 lift cam with duration in the 240 range. I am .150" from coil bind and I turn 6,800 quite often. So this 0.060" from bind is not true. Every engine and combo is different. Some engine love well over 0.100" from bind were others love to be .040" from bind. There is no set height that is end all for all applications.

Second, if you think the 1208X has too much load, you are dead wrong. There are plenty of guys with over 500lbs over the nose on stock style rocker arms. Load does not kill trunnions it is the RPM. If you want to run big lift on a stock rocker then you need to address the geometry of that rocker.

So to say the spring load destroyed your valve train is not true. there is more than likely an underlying root cause. All you the professional key board engine builders think you know more than a company like lethal or BES? Come on, they both have a proven record of high end lasting power.
Just what every forum needs. Another expert with no credentials or history here.

Seriously, if you think running too much pressure is fine, that's great. I just don't think you should tell other people it is.

I always advise people that asking questions on a forum is great, and can be informative, but before spending your money, or risking your engine (or life), speak to an expert that you trust unless you are knowledgeable yourself.

The post quoted is just more proof of this being sound advice.
__________________
2007 C6 vert, auto, F55, LT3
LME LS402 , WCCH 245 Heads, Pat G. Custom cam
YSI / 3.0 pulley, ARH 1 7/8 headers, NPP
Dewitts / dual spals, A&A dual pump fuel system.
3.42 polished gears, hardened shafts, Alky control meth, Cartech line lock, ECS axle loops, Trans brace, 6L80 built by me.
ID 1000 injectors, comp rockers, Morel lifters, BT springs, Trend 3/8 pushrods, ATI 10% OD Damper
Circle D Triple Disc stall
1009 RWHP @ 7000, 817 RWTQ @ 6000,
realcanuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 12:58 PM   #54
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by 376LS3 View Post
And who are you supposed to be that we just bend over and accept what you say as the word of God? You come in here telling us that some of the most respected builders on this site are wrong, and you don't give us any introduction to who you are or give us anything that shows you're credible. Are you an engine builder, do you manufacture springs, or a nut swinger? Give us something that shows we should give you the light of day.
If I am not mistaken, no engine builder said crap about the spring pressures, unless they themselves have thier own spring kits to sell.

No I am not an engine builder but i am in the valve spring business and have seen and spun more combonations than I can recal. And by spin I mean put on the spintron and test for valvetrain performance and spring performance. I am no nut swinger. I am who the pro's go to when they have issues.
TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 01:01 PM   #55
TurboBuick6
 
Drives: 2004 GTO, LQ9
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by realcanuk View Post

I always advise people that asking questions on a forum is great, and can be informative, but before spending your money, or risking your engine (or life), speak to an expert that you trust unless you are knowledgeable yourself.
Couldn't agree more with this statement. Just make sure you are asking someone who actually knows or who wants to sell you thier product.

If I recall correctly the patriot stuff was the best in the world untill they went under. After that the word on the WWW was get your patriot junk off before you blow your stuff up and switch it with these (same springs different name). Everyone took it as God's own word without even asking what the difference was, and if they did were just told not to worry about it.
TurboBuick6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 01:03 PM   #56
376LS3
Eh, that'll happen
 
376LS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuick6 View Post
If I am not mistaken, no engine builder said crap about the spring pressures, unless they themselves have thier own spring kits to sell.

No I am not an engine builder but i am in the valve spring business and have seen and spun more combonations than I can recal. And by spin I mean put on the spintron and test for valvetrain performance and spring performance. I am no nut swinger. I am who the pro's go to when they have issues.
Oh!!! Ok. That cleared up any hesitation I had. I'll go ahead and leave the 1208s on my car because the nameless man on C5 with 5 posts that came from nowhere said it was ok.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
376LS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.