Official 1/4 Mile (V6) 2010+ Camaro Fast List

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

99% of Camaro owners in general have no idea what the rear gear ratio is on a 2LS what are you talking about? I'm sure it is a real drag strip and all but the fact is most stock auto V6s run mid to high 14s and most bolt on auto cars run low 14s. Combined with that you have a 2LS with the "fuel economy" gears and you have the heaviest stock rim they ever offered which are even HEAVIER than the RS/SS 20s wrapped with the least sticky drag tire you could possibly find. On top of that your time slip has errors. How are you going to try and call it legitimate when half of it is messed up? That is like failing a test with a 50% and trying to argue you deserve a 100% because you did half the test perfectly.
And I know the times very well. Those cars are on the FAST list first of all and most of them are full bolt on, full bolt on + drag radial cars. And look at what they trapped, an average of about 100.7. Look at what the stock cars trap, about 96 on average.
I spent 3 years in the V6 "game" and raced my car a ton of times along with a bunch of people on this forum and there is just no way an auto V6 is running 13s stock. I think you're the victim of a messed up track or like I said you have some kind of factory freak and need a dyno.

Dug this up just for you. Car #13 is the 5.0 and I'm #22. Raced against him two different times. Timeslip on the left is the non-faulty one, the right is the faulty one.

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

Trust me when I say I really don't care. I just think its funny to call people out on BS and see them try to defend it.

From the looks of the post seems like you do care lol
What does your ss run again?

[Merc]

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

99% of Camaro owners in general have no idea what the rear gear ratio is on a 2LS what are you talking about? I'm sure it is a real drag strip and all but the fact is most stock auto V6s run mid to high 14s and most bolt on auto cars run low 14s. Combined with that you have a 2LS with the "fuel economy" gears and you have the heaviest stock rim they ever offered which are even HEAVIER than the RS/SS 20s wrapped with the least sticky drag tire you could possibly find. On top of that your time slip has errors. How are you going to try and call it legitimate when half of it is messed up? That is like failing a test with a 50% and trying to argue you deserve a 100% because you did half the test perfectly.
And I know the times very well. Those cars are on the FAST list first of all and most of them are full bolt on, full bolt on + drag radial cars. And look at what they trapped, an average of about 100.7. Look at what the stock cars trap, about 96 on average.
I spent 3 years in the V6 "game" and raced my car a ton of times along with a bunch of people on this forum and there is just no way an auto V6 is running 13s stock. I think you're the victim of a messed up track or like I said you have some kind of factory freak and need a dyno.

P.S. Two more things. One: according to Camaro5 wiki, the 18" steel wheels and BF Goodrich tires weigh 251.6 lbs, the 20" alloy wheels with the P Zero tires weigh 260.6 lbs. Two: you still didn't answer the question of how much your v6 weighed with you in it.

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Lot's of people run at the same track and they get great times with negative DA. However, there doesn't seem to be anything that is super extraordinary. Look at the fast lists for the stock LS3 and L99. The fastest cars are well below (3-4 tenths) the magazine times for those cars. The magazine times for the LLT (less power) were around 14.3, so why is so surprising someone who knows how to drive and got good air ran 3 tenths faster? It isn't like she ran good times once. She's posted several very low 14s time slips. I see no reason to doubt her times just because she broke the record. Hope she or someone else does it again.

[Camarojt]

Originally Posted by EnlighteningYou

Not tryng to be rude, but what possible skills come into play when driving and AUTOMATIC trans car? lol. there is one pedal and hold on.

You sir are clueless! Let me guess, you drive a stick but are slow at that therefore taking credit from any automatic that goes faster than you dem fair?
If that's all there was to it then there would be such a small margin of difference between all auto cars with like mods.

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

I'm sure it is a real drag strip and all but the fact is most stock auto V6s run mid to high 14s and most bolt on auto cars run low 14s.

I spent 3 years in the V6 "game" and raced my car a ton of times along with a bunch of people on this forum and there is just no way an auto V6 is running 13s stock.

She had extremely good DA, and sounds like she knows her way around the track. When you have raced for years or been around racing a long time, you know a lot of the little things that makes car run a touch better than your counterparts.
You say most stock Auto V6's run mid to high 14's, so it MUST be that her car is mistaken right?

Most bolt on only SS cars run mid 12's but I run mid 11's so at some point, it all comes into factor. Strong car, good DA, experienced driver! Nuff said.

Maybe in your 3 years in the V6 game you didn't run that fast, that doesn't mean she can't?

Not to mention, she threw out a challenge of $500 to prove her wrong. Either put up, or shut up!

Congrats on the times and I hope you go faster just to shut the doubters up!

[DarkneSS]

Originally Posted by 62nalide

From the looks of the post seems like you do care lol
What does your ss run again?

It pulls mid to high 12s cars with an intake and cut outs but at the track the way it is probably low 13s with a 12.8 12.9 possible with a perfect launch. My rim/tire set up is heavier than stock by a decent margin.

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

Lot's of people run at the same track and they get great times with negative DA. However, there doesn't seem to be anything that is super extraordinary. Look at the fast lists for the stock LS3 and L99. The fastest cars are well below (3-4 tenths) the magazine times for those cars. The magazine times for the LLT (less power) were around 14.3, so why is so surprising someone who knows how to drive and got good air ran 3 tenths faster? It isn't like she ran good times once. She's posted several very low 14s time slips. I see no reason to doubt her times just because she broke the record. Hope she or someone else does it again.

Those mag times were with the manual tranny, the autos ran 14.5ish. The manuals put down 15whpish more so viola to no surprise they run a couple tenths quicker and trap a couple MPH higher. All I'm saying is the 100 MPH trap is suspect. Had it have been a 13.9-14.0 run with a 1.875(probably not possible) or 1.9 60' foot you wouldn't have heard shit from me. Trap requires power. Which is why in my first post I said DYNO this shit! Because its probably a factory freak if its truly bone stock which is awesome. Its gotta be making around 265-270 wheel and those cars typically dyno 245-250 if memory serves me.
Race girl since its a 2013 did you buy this car new or used?

Originally Posted by Camarojt

She had extremely good DA, and sounds like she knows her way around the track. When you have raced for years or been around racing a long time, you know a lot of the little things that makes car run a touch better than your counterparts.
You say most stock Auto V6's run mid to high 14's, so it MUST be that her car is mistaken right?

Most bolt on only SS cars run mid 12's but I run mid 11's so at some point, it all comes into factor. Strong car, good DA, experienced driver! Nuff said.

Maybe in your 3 years in the V6 game you didn't run that fast, that doesn't mean she can't?

Not to mention, she threw out a challenge of $500 to prove her wrong. Either put up, or shut up!

Congrats on the times and I hope you go faster just to shut the doubters up!

If she was closer I'd go rent a V6 and we'd hit the track but alas I'm too far. If someone in the area is willing I might be willing to pay for the rental at least just because I did come on here and run my keyboard. I aint doing no $500 though.

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

It pulls mid to high 12s cars with an intake and cut outs but at the track the way it is probably low 13s with a 12.8 12.9 possible with a perfect launch. My rim/tire set up is heavier than stock by a decent margin.


Those mag times were with the manual tranny, the autos ran 14.5ish. The manuals put down 15whpish more so viola to no surprise they run a couple tenths quicker and trap a couple MPH higher. All I'm saying is the 100 MPH trap is suspect. Had it have been a 13.9-14.0 run with a 1.875(probably not possible) or 1.9 60' foot you wouldn't have heard shit from me. Trap requires power. Which is why in my first post I said DYNO this shit! Because its probably a factory freak if its truly bone stock which is awesome. Its gotta be making around 265-270 wheel and those cars typically dyno 245-250 if memory serves me.
Race girl since its a 2013 did you buy this car new or used?


If she was closer I'd go rent a V6 and we'd hit the track but alas I'm too far. If someone in the area is willing I might be willing to pay for the rental at least just because I did come on here and run my keyboard. I aint doing no $500 though.

Car was bought brand new. And I went 99.97 trap speed at +700 DA, so it was a given that I'd have a higher trap speed in negative DA. Again, still haven't answered my question of how much your v6 weighed with driver?

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

Those mag times were with the manual tranny, the autos ran 14.5ish. The manuals put down 15whpish more so viola to no surprise they run a couple tenths quicker and trap a couple MPH higher. All I'm saying is the 100 MPH trap is suspect. Had it have been a 13.9-14.0 run with a 1.875(probably not possible) or 1.9 60' foot you wouldn't have heard shit from me. Trap requires power. Which is why in my first post I said DYNO this shit! Because its probably a factory freak if its truly bone stock which is awesome. Its gotta be making around 265-270 wheel and those cars typically dyno 245-250 if memory serves me.
Race girl since its a 2013 did you buy this car new or used?

Actually, one magazine tested an automatic 2010 Synergy Green and ran 14.2 if I remember right. Everyone thought it was a fluke or that they Synergy Greens made more power than the others.

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

It pulls mid to high 12s cars with an intake and cut outs but at the track the way it is probably low 13s with a 12.8 12.9 possible with a perfect launch. My rim/tire set up is heavier than stock by a decent margin.
h.

Ok, so if you add headers and a pulley whats your guess on what it'll run?

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by 62nalide

Ok, so if you add headers and a pulley whats your guess on what it'll run?

11.520 of course.

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

11.520 of course.

I see you catch what I was trying to do lol

[rtcat600man]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

It pulls mid to high 12s cars with an intake and cut outs but at the track the way it is probably low 13s with a 12.8 12.9 possible with a perfect launch. My rim/tire set up is heavier than stock by a decent margin.


Those mag times were with the manual tranny, the autos ran 14.5ish. The manuals put down 15whpish more so viola to no surprise they run a couple tenths quicker and trap a couple MPH higher. All I'm saying is the 100 MPH trap is suspect. Had it have been a 13.9-14.0 run with a 1.875(probably not possible) or 1.9 60' foot you wouldn't have heard shit from me. Trap requires power. Which is why in my first post I said DYNO this shit! Because its probably a factory freak if its truly bone stock which is awesome. Its gotta be making around 265-270 wheel and those cars typically dyno 245-250 if memory serves me.
Race girl since its a 2013 did you buy this car new or used?


If she was closer I'd go rent a V6 and we'd hit the track but alas I'm too far. If someone in the area is willing I might be willing to pay for the rental at least just because I did come on here and run my keyboard. I aint doing no $500 though.

Got any slips to show those high 12 runs? I remember a time when you had your V6 and you thought with your ability, perfect shifts, etc etc you would be setting some very hot times. But it never panned out as you found it was tougher than you thought.

As for her HP, remember she is running with a LFX, which is 323 HP. Ricer math on an auto would put her around 258 HP at the wheels. The numbers you listed might be from the stock LLT's?

Instead of offering to race her with a rental, send her the money to go get a dyno.........

Oh the bench racing...................got to love it............

[PoorMansCamaro]

that would definitely be a factory freak. i was pulling off a 104 trap speed with nitrous, in a manual tranny.