09-26-2013, 12:43 PM | #71 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 01:38 PM | #72 |
|
I read only the initial post to this thread and laughed. I have not seen a stock 5.7 hemi run under a 14 ever! I cai and exhaust aint gonna make it come close to a camaro with a V8.
__________________
SS, A8, Procharger, M&T's and stuff... |
09-26-2013, 01:57 PM | #73 |
who won? lol
|
|
09-26-2013, 02:19 PM | #74 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 02:29 PM | #75 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
As far as people running those times and saying they are stock...I don't trust it. Because like I said, people will flat out lie to make them or their car or their favorite car sound faster than it really is. Magazines are by far more trustworthy because they have a reputation as being truthful and unbiased. If they claimed false numbers, trust me their boards and mail columns would be full of people calling them out. Whether they give you the absolute best possible time on the absolute best possible day with the absolute best possible conditions in a factory freak or not isn't my concern. When 2 or 3 mags each consistently report within a tenth or two of each other...that is by far more reliable than some bozo claiming he ran 5-7 tenths faster. And I agree that weight is a big issue. Which is why I said the R/T and SRT-8 were slow considering the hp and tq they have. |
|
09-26-2013, 02:55 PM | #76 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 03:12 PM | #77 |
|
And MotorTrend got 12.9 sec @ 110.7 mph out of an SS and 12.7 sec @ 111.3 mph out of a 5.0. If you're going to cherry-pick best magazine times for a car, at least include all of them.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
09-26-2013, 03:20 PM | #78 |
|
You can't simply pick one comparison and build a case around it. Let's look at all of the SS vs 5.0 published head-to-head comparisons:
Motor Trend: GT 12.7 sec @ 111.3 mph, SS 13.1 sec @ 110.8 mph Car and Driver: GT 13.2 sec @ 109 mph, SS 13.0 sec @ 111 mph Road & Track: GT 13.2 sec @ 109.3 mph, SS 13.0 sec @ 110.7 mph (0-120 mph: GT 16.4 sec, SS 15.4 sec), Willow Springs Lap: GT 1:37.6, SS 1:37.7) Inside Line: GT 13.3 sec @ 107.3 mph, SS 13.1 sec @ 110.4 mph So in the other 3 head-to-head comparisons the 5.0 was slower in the quarter mile, with lower trap speeds, slower to 120mph and slower around a track.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
09-26-2013, 03:22 PM | #79 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 04:00 PM | #80 |
One Slow Automatic
Drives: 2017 GS 2010 CAMARO SS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NC NJ NY DMV THE BAYAREA
Posts: 877
|
NO WORRIES U GOT EM!
__________________
650HP 2010 CAMARO SS 710HP 2017 GRAND SPORT
|
09-26-2013, 04:21 PM | #81 |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
|
09-26-2013, 05:31 PM | #82 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2013, 05:55 PM | #83 |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
|
09-26-2013, 08:14 PM | #84 |
2013 Super Bee
Drives: 2013 Super Bee Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
|
Oh wow, there are actually people that STILL don't believe an SRT8 392 can run a 12.2 bone stock??? Whatever, im done with that. Its a fact and proven that they can run 12.2's bone stock. But now not going to believe a bone stock R/T can run a 13.2??? WOW, BOTH of my bone stock auto 2010 R/T Challengers ran 13.2's @ 106 with ZERO mods right off of the showroom floor. Some people just don't get it and those are the people that get their ass waxed by something that "is not supposed to beat them" because the magazine time says so. LOL
Is it the norm for a stock 392 to run a 12.2? Nope, I ran consistent 12.3's-12.4's @ 114. I ran a couple 12.2's and that's it but it did happen in a positive DA and not mine shaft air. ZERO MODS Is it the norm for a stock R/T Challenger to run low 13's? Nope, but it did happen quite often with my auto R/T Challengers. I consistently ran 13.2's-13.3's with them. ZERO MODS There is even a vid of a bone stock 2011 auto R/T Challenger running a 13.0!!!!! It happens.....get over it!!!! NEXT..................
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD 2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD 2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD 2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now. Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74 Last edited by SRT8Tech; 09-26-2013 at 08:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|