FenwickHockey65's Great Thread of GM Knowledge - Page 346 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

*DGthe3* · 02-08-2018, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/...-traverse.html

Traverse RS. Wooooooo.

Looks alright. Wish they included a static pic of the wheels with the special 'dark Android' finish.

FenwickHockey65 · 02-08-2018, 09:15 PM

Woooooo.

By the way, I'm starting to think the 2.0T was originally slated to be the base engine for Traverse, then GM found out the 3.6L got better fuel economy and had to figure out a purpose for the 2.0T and created an RS model.

ChevyRules · 02-08-2018, 09:25 PM

So how is GM going to market this RS being performance oriented when the 2.0T is down 55 HP from the 3.6? Granted it has 30 lb.ft of torque advantage, but its HP that sells people.

FenwickHockey65 · 02-08-2018, 09:31 PM

I'm all for the expanded use of the RS badge and packaging throughout the Chevrolet lineup, but the Traverse RS with its forced 2.0T and FWD only just seems stupid, plus it diverts from what RS is supposed to be, just a sporty appearance package.

Not to mention the Redline package with its blacked-out taillights looks way sportier.

Royal Tiger · 02-08-2018, 10:05 PM

That’s what will sell; a large SUV with only FWD and a little turbo 4.

*DGthe3* · 02-08-2018, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

I'm all for the expanded use of the RS badge and packaging throughout the Chevrolet lineup, but the Traverse RS with its forced 2.0T and FWD only just seems stupid, plus it diverts from what RS is supposed to be, just a sporty appearance package.

Not to mention the Redline package with its blacked-out taillights looks way sportier.

It should still be quicker than my parents Sonic RS. Nearly double the power, with 'only' about 50% more weight.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Tiger

That’s what will sell; a large SUV with only FWD and a little turbo 4.

I'm sure it will. People have an insatiable demand for crossovers, and are slowly becoming convinced that turbo4 > V6.

Not to mention, I bet most crossovers (and 0 SUV's) sold today have a 4 cylinder & fwd.

xc_SS/RS · 02-09-2018, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Tiger

That’s what will sell; a large SUV with only FWD and a little turbo 4.

i don't know if the people looking at/buying this CUV will notice the difference. i'm with you though, i don't get it either lol

JerTM · 02-09-2018, 11:24 AM

I'm happy they finally started putting something different in them than the 3.6L and 6T70.

KMPrenger · 02-09-2018, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/...-traverse.html

Traverse RS. Wooooooo.

I actually saw a Traverse Premier Redline yesterday and it did look all right surprisingly.

When I first saw the Traverse unveiling, I was a bit underwhelmed. Looks OK I thought. But I have seen a few of the upper trimmed models out in the wild now, and I have to say I am a fan. Better than pictures that is for sure. I also thought it looked better than the Equinox, which to me, only looks decent in the top trim, otherwise looking boring and awkward in the rear.

I have only seen video and images of the new Buick Enclave, but assuming it also looks better in person, it should be a real looker. I like it a lot.

I think the Traverse RS looks good, but what the heck. So the only way to get a the turbo 4 cylinder, is in the RS? ...and then you are stuck with it? Yeah...something doesn't make an sense there. When I read "turbocharged" I got excited and thought maybe they went for a real surprise and slapped a turbo V6 in there. I was wrong.

*DGthe3* · 02-09-2018, 03:29 PM

Am I the only one that expects an RS package to be all show & no go?

JerTM · 02-09-2018, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Am I the only one that expects an RS package to be all show & no go?

For once I agree with you. But I would also expect a "Redline" package to have at least some go with it, not just striped wheels and black badges. I think GM's branding department has too many decision makers.

shaffe · 02-12-2018, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/...-traverse.html

Traverse RS. Wooooooo.

I actually saw a Traverse Premier Redline yesterday and it did look all right surprisingly.

Eh its no Explorer Sport

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger

When I first saw the Traverse unveiling, I was a bit underwhelmed. Looks OK I thought. But I have seen a few of the upper trimmed models out in the wild now, and I have to say I am a fan. Better than pictures that is for sure. I also thought it looked better than the Equinox, which to me, only looks decent in the top trim, otherwise looking boring and awkward in the rear.

I have only seen video and images of the new Buick Enclave, but assuming it also looks better in person, it should be a real looker. I like it a lot.

I think the Traverse RS looks good, but what the heck. So the only way to get a the turbo 4 cylinder, is in the RS? ...and then you are stuck with it? Yeah...something doesn't make an sense there. When I read "turbocharged" I got excited and thought maybe they went for a real surprise and slapped a turbo V6 in there. I was wrong.

Likewise, I thought they were going to make an Explorer Sport competitor

RLHMARINES · 02-12-2018, 04:14 PM

RS trims on Chevrolet models never bring additional horse power, never.

sherob · 02-12-2018, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaffe

Eh its no Explorer Sport

Likewise, I thought they were going to make an Explorer Sport competitor

That would have been great! I owned an Explorer Sport before my SS, was fun...

02-08-2018, 09:15 PM	#4832
FenwickHockey65 General Motors Aficionado Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Florida Posts: 37,371 View My Garage	Woooooo. By the way, I'm starting to think the 2.0T was originally slated to be the base engine for Traverse, then GM found out the 3.6L got better fuel economy and had to figure out a purpose for the 2.0T and created an RS model. __________________ 2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)

02-08-2018, 09:31 PM	#4834
FenwickHockey65 General Motors Aficionado Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Florida Posts: 37,371 View My Garage	I'm all for the expanded use of the RS badge and packaging throughout the Chevrolet lineup, but the Traverse RS with its forced 2.0T and FWD only just seems stupid, plus it diverts from what RS is supposed to be, just a sporty appearance package. Not to mention the Redline package with its blacked-out taillights looks way sportier. __________________ 2023 GMC Canyon Elevation 2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)

02-09-2018, 03:29 PM	#4840
DGthe3 Moderator.ca Drives: 05 Grand Am GT Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Niagara, Canada Posts: 25,372	Am I the only one that expects an RS package to be all show & no go? __________________ Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them __________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!! __________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum

02-12-2018, 04:14 PM	#4843
RLHMARINES 1st Civ. Div. Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ" Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Savannah, Ga Posts: 2,726	RS trims on Chevrolet models never bring additional horse power, never. __________________ Swift....Silent....Deadly

02-08-2018, 09:25 PM	#4833
ChevyRules Drives: 2021 Tesla Model 3 LR Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Posts: 964	So how is GM going to market this RS being performance oriented when the 2.0T is down 55 HP from the 3.6? Granted it has 30 lb.ft of torque advantage, but its HP that sells people.

02-08-2018, 10:05 PM	#4835
Royal Tiger Account Suspended Drives: 2013 2SS/RS Convertible Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: Lehigh Valley, PA Posts: 3,873	That’s what will sell; a large SUV with only FWD and a little turbo 4.

02-09-2018, 11:24 AM	#4838
JerTM Drives: 2011 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: Oct 2015 Location: Utah Posts: 1,940	I'm happy they finally started putting something different in them than the 3.6L and 6T70.