Mid eng Camaro

[cdb95z28]

Originally Posted by Thunderstick

I may be the minority but I am getting tired of these renderings. So many places use them as click bait and 9.9 out of 10 times the car "rendered" will never be built. Call me old fashioned but If someone draws a pretty picture it does nothing for me. The REAL talent is the people building real life cars that dont just exist in the cloud.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

This.

[DGthe3]

Originally Posted by Thunderstick

I may be the minority but I am getting tired of these renderings. So many places use them as click bait and 9.9 out of 10 times the car "rendered" will never be built. Call me old fashioned but If someone draws a pretty picture it does nothing for me. The REAL talent is the people building real life cars that dont just exist in the cloud.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

You're being conservative. You're still allowing 1 out of 100 to be 'real'. Probably closer to 1 in 1000, and I wouldn't be too worried about putting my money on 1 in 10,000

With a mid engined Camaro ... what problem does it solve? Are people frustrated by the excess of rear-seat space? Is there a need for GM to make a $45,000 turbo4 sports car? No? Then let the Camaro continue to be a front-engined 4-seater.

[Avenging Orange]

Originally Posted by Thunderstick

I may be the minority but I am getting tired of these renderings. So many places use them as click bait and 9.9 out of 10 times the car "rendered" will never be built. Call me old fashioned but If someone draws a pretty picture it does nothing for me. The REAL talent is the people building real life cars that dont just exist in the cloud.


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Amen
But imagine the balance...hmmm.