04-23-2013, 08:05 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 1LT Limited Edition Camaro A6 Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 887
|
V6 and Premium fuel?
Just curious...
I have a V6 2010 camaro... I usually run 87 octane fuel.... Is there any benefit going to 89 or 91 or higher? More horse? Better mileage? Smoother ride? Just curious since the manual says 87 or higher... Was wondering if anyone did the research and found out anything |
04-23-2013, 08:06 AM | #2 |
Roof expert detail noob
Drives: 2013 BRM 2LT RS Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 822
|
I hear you get a nice placebo effect
__________________
|
04-23-2013, 08:10 AM | #3 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Is less timing being pulled a placebo effect? Is a slightly smoother and stronger dyno result a placebo effect?
A fair amount of research has been done on this forum over the past few years, showing what I stated above. My honest opinion is this: Yes running a higher octane can be beneficial, but are the results from doing so are probably not big enough to be real noticeable.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
04-23-2013, 08:15 AM | #4 | |
Roof expert detail noob
Drives: 2013 BRM 2LT RS Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 822
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
04-23-2013, 08:33 AM | #5 |
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
|
If you are drag racing then I would use premium. Its going to be expensive filling up the car anyways, huge fuel tank.
|
04-23-2013, 08:39 AM | #6 | |
They see me trollin'...
Drives: 217 ci of fury; Chauffeured by SS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 13,876
|
Quote:
Also, to the OP... I use 87. Some say that oh, it must mean I don't love my car, blah blah blah, but the fact is that the 30-50cent difference between 87 and premium adds up. I bought the V6 so I could use cheaper fuel because my car is a DD that's gotten 66k in two years. If I thought 87 was going to tear it up, I'd use premium, but for me the benefits just aren't enough to make me switch over. But there are a host of different ideas and points of view on this. Use the search and you'll see a lot of threads.
__________________
"Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff." -CamaroSpike
2011 Custom LT/RS: Bella's Build Thread |
|
04-23-2013, 08:43 AM | #7 |
Drives: car Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Location
Posts: 130
|
If you have a stick and want a little forgiveness on taking off from a Dead Stop, go with Premium. I have killed the car several times on regular 87 oct. never on 92 or 93. I am sure you other Manual owners know the frustration of the deadband that the LLT has just as the clutch starts disengaging.
|
04-23-2013, 08:52 AM | #8 |
Emerald Coast Camaros
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tallahassee FL
Posts: 9,687
|
I have only ran 93 since I have owned the car. The dealer probably put 87 in the first tank but since then It has been 93. I don't drive my car every day and I really fill the thank up maybe once every 4 months so the extra couple of dollars so no big deal.
|
04-23-2013, 08:55 AM | #9 |
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
The ONLY time you'll benefit from higher octane is if you're having a issue with the lower octane fuel. If the 87 in your area isn't causing your engine to knock, buying higher octane will do absolutely nothing but lighten your bank account. There isn't a high and low octane table in the PCM, like the SS has. As long as you're not knocking, the PCM is giving you all the timing that's available in the OEM tune.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
04-23-2013, 08:55 AM | #10 |
Drives: 2013 camaro ls; 2005 rx8 Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 577
|
like someone mentioned above, this car is my daily...so i use 89 in the camaro (didnt notice a difference from the first tank of 87 the dealership put in there), but i use 93 octane in my rx8.
|
04-23-2013, 09:22 AM | #11 |
Drives: '11 2SS, '11 C6 GS, '04 MDX Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kearney, MO
Posts: 2,845
|
IMO I'm only throwing money away if I put anything higher than 87 in the tank.
|
04-23-2013, 09:26 AM | #12 | |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
Quote:
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
04-23-2013, 09:59 AM | #13 | |
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
|
Quote:
OP, are you planning any major mods? |
|
04-23-2013, 10:05 AM | #14 |
Member "O'l Farts"
Drives: 2012 SS Coupe/Automatic/Sunroof Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pueblo West, Colorado
Posts: 272
|
One asset yet to be mentioned is additives in premium fuel. I used to run a tank full every 3 or 4 fill-ups as I believe that premium fuel has more cleanning additives. It sure won't hurt anything but as some say it is considerably more expensive. Now I only run Shell premium.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|