09-15-2014, 10:26 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
|
Someone called my 2LS "All show and no go."
I didn't want to debate the topic, as I suspect it was a combo of...
1) trying to be funny... 2) assumption based on it being the v6. It's not like I did anything after market to make it flashier, or appear to be modified, it just is what it is. Still, I wanted to be like, "Well, so and so has the same 0-60...or blah blah has the same power to weight ratio"...but I didn't want to come off like I'm trying to justify my car. :P |
09-15-2014, 10:32 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 538
|
This is what idiots do, they always having something smart to say about someone else's car. Don't even worry about it man.
FYI, Im sure you don't mean to, but prepare for another V6 vs V8 thread
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3 M6 - 672rwhp/581rwtq - 91 octane tune
|
09-15-2014, 10:36 AM | #3 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1LT Hyper Blue Metallic Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,122
|
Oh boy, not my intent! At least (most?) V8 owners acknowledge that the V6 is a viable engine option. I recall someone here saying that, on the GM page, the V6 Camaro shouldn't be in the performance section (with the V8 Camaros and Corvettes).
|
09-15-2014, 10:42 AM | #4 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 538
|
Quote:
Haha that is ridiculous. I think "Performance" is relative to the person driving it. To someone whos upgraded from a 150RWHP car to a 300RWHP would consider that a performance upgrade, but someone at 450RWHP might not call that performance, and someone who drives a 600RWHP might not consider a camaro SS as "Performance" hopefully that makes sense. In the end who cares! Haha, all that matters is congrats on the Camaro!
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3 M6 - 672rwhp/581rwtq - 91 octane tune
|
|
09-15-2014, 10:43 AM | #5 |
Mid-Florida Camaro Club
|
Being a 2LS I would categorize it as more go then show.
|
09-15-2014, 10:46 AM | #6 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 412
|
330 HP and 30+ hwy mpg!
I wanted and got a V8, but wouldnt have been embarassed to drive a V6 at all. He was just jealous. |
09-15-2014, 10:49 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2016 1SS SW Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,443
|
That statement used to be true, so the old expression will stick. The 2005-2009 V6 Mustang was the epitome of that expression (the V8 was too ha!). Even if they made a 500 hp V6 that ran low 12's people would still say that because it wasn't as fast as the V8. Most of the people that say this don't have a single fast car in their garage line-up, so don't let'm drag you down.
|
09-15-2014, 10:51 AM | #8 |
Account Suspended
Drives: Camaro and Sierra Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 795
|
Id agree if all you do is cosmetic upgrades and no performance upgrades. Same as these idiots with body kits on a cavalier and thinking they are paul walker
|
09-15-2014, 10:52 AM | #9 | |
The Stealth Bumblebee
Drives: Black 2013 2LS Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SW of Houston
Posts: 1,385
|
Quote:
Don't listen to those people they are no better than anyone with a ZL1. Why didn't they get a Zl1? And someone with a Z28 has the right to say a ZL1 is all show and no go! So stuff it people. This isn't 1975 no more.. Camaros and Mustangs have 6 cylinders. Even F1 has 6 cylinder engines. A Camry that can compete on a 0-60 with a camaro. With that being said not all v6s are lame as shit anymore.
__________________
KILLER BEE
|
|
09-15-2014, 10:55 AM | #10 |
Captain Gingerbeard
Drives: 2012 IOM RS/SS 6MT Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: West Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 2,489
|
I was actually going to order a V6!
Then I heard the V8 and decided to skip the leather V6 and get a cloth V8 instead. 326 hp is MORE than enough! That being said, I will usually poke a bit of fun at a v6 Camaro, but only in a friendly way. Hell--the specific output of the V6 is far superior to the specific output of the V8 and it's definitely a more efficient engine. |
09-15-2014, 10:57 AM | #11 |
Drives: 2013 GAZ 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 418
|
I've had both the V6 and V8. I think the V6 handled real good and had great acceleration. V8 is a little faster but I have only ever gotten 14mpg out of mine where I got 18 out of the V6. I notice that the most.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
__________________
If you see it, get it, for tomorrow it may be gone!
|
09-15-2014, 10:57 AM | #12 |
Drives: too many Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: oh va pa ma tx
Posts: 3,046
|
hahaha all show, don't bite and let it go. Those are anrgy unhappy people talkin..
__________________
|
09-15-2014, 11:12 AM | #13 |
Drives: 2012 1SS, 6spd. many mods 478 rwhp Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Harrisburg Pa.
Posts: 283
|
Check the hp on a '98-'02 LS1 Z28 once. And we thought that was fast.
|
09-15-2014, 11:12 AM | #14 |
Engineer of softness-ware
Drives: 2013 2LT RS Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SoCal/Chicago
Posts: 741
|
You should have asked him where his Camaro was since he's so knowledgeable about them.
|
|
|
|
|