04-05-2015, 04:54 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro ss M6 Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 148
|
Kenne Bell superchargers
Greetings,
Just wondering why more people don't talk about Kenne Bell superchargers? Their dyno graphs look pretty. Plus it does have an EO#. Anyone have one of these TS series superchargers and how do you like them? |
04-05-2015, 05:37 PM | #2 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS RS 6M Inferno Orange Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Clemente CA
Posts: 309
|
There used to be a fair bit of talk in here about KB ... Back in 2010-2011 you'd see equal chatter about the Whipple, Maggie and KB.
There was a lot of noise about the higher AITs ... And how that effected HP. These days there are many more FI products available for the Camaro ... Whipple and Maggie have held their own against the new competition ... KB seemed to fall by the way side. Well that's my theory for what it's worth. |
04-05-2015, 05:40 PM | #3 |
Supercharged LSX
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Black/Carbon Fiber Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,741
|
They suck. Lol. I have one on my LS2 and it runs sooooo hot I have to dump tons off meth into the intake. Better options.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
__________________
|
04-05-2015, 09:18 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,172
|
I bought a Kenne Bell this winter for my LS3 Camaro. I did a LOT of searching and reading and decided to give it a go, even though there are some KB haters here who did their best to scare me out of it. My install of my KB starts next week. Check back here and I'll give you an honest review!
There are some guys here who love them, and some who bash them. And because of their factory direct to consumer sales model with very few dealers getting the okay from them to sell, many of the big hitter vendors on this site dump on Kenne Bell regularly because they'd rather you buy a Maggie or Whipple or something they can make some profit on. And who's to blame them for that. This is how they make their living and it's not like the options they are offering are "bad"...lots of awesome FI options for our cars. Much of the bashing you'll see is because of high IAT's. But what you will also see is that they make huge power. You already saw the graphs from KB. Many people here have got 550 to the wheels with just the KB. Whipple gets these numbers too. Most other chargers will get 490-500. So you get about 50 more with the KB. And the KB comes with a much better CAI as part of the base kit. Also, in all my research, I noticed that ALL positive displacement chargers have many threads about high IAT's. It's part of the deal when it comes to top mount PD chargers on these LS3 engines. The pushrods just don't allow for intercoolers that are the size that the Ford guys can get in with the DOHC Coyote engines. Only difference is that KB has a lot of haters. Vendors don't like them because they can't make money off them. Then you have a lot of the lemmings who just pile on and have never even had the KB. And then you have the guys who have one (or had one in the past) and either love it or got rid of it (usually for high IAT's). Research and read and you'll find the 3 groups real quick. KB has also recently changed their intercooler to a better one. And they have a dual pass heat exchanger (you'll read that in the past they didn't, but mine came with one!). Bottom line. The KB charger is a fantastic option. But so are the other options too. Also...give Jim Bell a call at Kenne Bell. He's the owner. He loves to talk superchargers and is usually happy to talk. Last edited by cc-rider; 04-05-2015 at 09:50 PM. |
04-06-2015, 12:18 AM | #5 |
Supercharged LSX
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Black/Carbon Fiber Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,741
|
Like I said. I HAVE A KENNE BELL and hate it. Still better than nothing. I did find a company that makes a meth injection plate that mounts under the screws and top of IC. I'm gonna try that and see if dumping tons of meth there cools the IAT down.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
__________________
|
04-06-2015, 11:31 AM | #6 |
Drives: 2013 2ss/rs 1le Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 297
|
i had a kenne bell and hated was always stretching belts incredibly high iat's now I'm going with a agp twin turbo
|
04-06-2015, 12:10 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 205
|
The worst top mount of all time. I had one on a LS1 Corvette and it would get so hot that one day I put a piece of tin foil over the top and grilled 2 cheeseburgers. It also just about melted everything in my engine compartment. I switched back to the ECS Paxton set up.
|
04-06-2015, 12:13 PM | #8 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2015, 12:29 PM | #9 | |
Drives: 2014 1SS RS 1LE tvs2300 Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MD
Posts: 420
|
Quote:
__________________
SLP TVS 2300 Kooks 1 7/8" Rotofab intake NPP
JRE tuned |
|
04-06-2015, 01:38 PM | #10 |
I have a lot of buddies with Mustangs who run Kenne Bell and have had luck. I have heard about higher AITs from them, as well. The other thing is Kenne Bell doesn't market or sell to 3rd party vendors. You buy directly from them.
|
|
04-06-2015, 02:13 PM | #11 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,172
|
Quote:
Do you have some IAT2 data logs you can provide? |
|
04-06-2015, 02:32 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,172
|
I'd really love for someone to provide a logical explanation that is either driven by HONEST data or physics that explains why a Kenne Bell supercharger working air to 8 psi creates temperatures that are so insanely higher than other top mount PD chargers (i.e. Maggie or Whipple)? Anyone?
I know that some of the IAT data you'll find here searching about the Whipple vs KB is misleading. The Whipple used to take their IAT2 readings before the supercharger. Do they still do that? That just seems dumb and dangerous to me...but sure enough will result in a good IAT2 reading. They all have roughly the same size intercooler brick and heat exchanger. They are all top mounts attached right to the engine block so they will inherently get hot from conduction. They all compress air to 8 psi which creates heat. I can't imagine that any one of them can compress the air to 8 psi significantly cooler than the other. In fact, there are many claims that twin screw chargers are the most efficient PD chargers out there. So that would then leave the intercooler system to be the determining factor. And as already mentioned...they are all roughly the same thing. So why is this that the KB apparently has these soaring IAT's while the other top mount PD chargers are so much better? I'm asking for real! I would seriously like to know. I have found no logical explanation for this. Therefore...I tend to think that this is just KB hate. But I may be wrong... Last edited by cc-rider; 04-06-2015 at 02:45 PM. |
04-06-2015, 04:39 PM | #13 | |
Drives: All things Turbocharged Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Some compressors are more efficient than others. Sometimes the difference is huge. PD blowers have some serious problems with 'super heating' the air. This is when the heated compressed air slips backwards to the compressor stage and it compressed again and the heat is multiplied. The high IAT data on KB's has been out and common knowledge for years. They are clearly not as efficient as others. |
|
04-06-2015, 04:46 PM | #14 |
Drives: 68,87,99 camaro,07TBSS Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 148
|
Not a Camaro but here's a build from another forum. Post #50 IAT 228*.
http://www.performancetrucks.net/for...-522509/page5/
__________________
2007 TBSS, forged 6.2, 2.9 whipple 9.9@135
(Now with CNC LSA, Numbers coming soon) 1999 Camaro SS, CNC LSA, 4L80, S60 1987 Camaro Iroc-Z, ZR1 blower, TR6060, S60 1968 Camaro SS, YSI 427 ERL in the works. |
|
|
|
|