04-30-2012, 08:26 PM | #57 | |
Thread Ender
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
<--- Drives a Camaro V6 (LLT) so im REALLY not fighting for the other team hah! If what Deki says is true, 2011's with a good driver Manual are running 13.4-13.7 (mids) and stock 2011's Manual Camaros were running what 14.1? Didnt look too much into it. That number sticks out though. (BOLD)For the 2012's is 18 HP .3-.4 tenths? Cheers. |
|
04-30-2012, 08:43 PM | #58 | |
LFX is not the average V6
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
the v6 mustang, on the other hand, just seemed underpowered to me. i am unbiased in my review, and actually prefer the Ford brand name over the Chevy name. there is no way in hell that the 2012 v6 mustang is anywhere near as powerful as the 2012 V6 camaro. like i said in my first post, i had a planned "power test" this was my simple "power test" city test: 1. go 0-60 as fast as possible. (speed limit on that particular road was 55mph) 2. in 2nd gear, at 2000RPMs, give it full throttle for approx. 2 seconds. 3. repeat test 2 at 3000RPMs 4. repeat test 2 at 4000RPMs 5. repeat test 2 at 5000RPMs (for 1 second) highway: similar process as 2-5 from the city test, but in 2-5th gear, in order to stay within reasonable speeds. (no more than 10mph over the limit) i explained to the lady from the dealership who rode with me what i wanted to do why. I expected a "NO!", but surprisingly, she complied and told me i could do all this as long as i didn't too far over the speed limit and drive normal for the first few minutes of the test drive, so she could judge my driving ability before she gave the OK to do my "test". the point of that power test was to assess how much power the car had at certain RPMs to kind of get a feel for the car's power throughout the powerband. there was not one single part of the test where the mustang had more power, though it was pretty close at 5500RPM+. i did use the speedometer to see how fast i was accelerating instead of just relying on feel. the biggest difference in power between the two cars was between 2000-4000RPMs. this was where the mustang was really lacking, especially under 3000RPMs. to keep the comparison as accurate as possible, i did this same power test in my camaro before and after i test drove the mustang. both cars were up to their optimal operating temperatures when these tests were done and the weather was the same with the same ambient temperature as well. i even used the same roads to conduct these tests, so i eliminated as many of the variables that i could. |
|
04-30-2012, 08:52 PM | #59 |
Thread Ender
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,038
|
Then you're a lot nicer than I. Hell I was pretty pointlessly test driving an L99 no more than 3 weeks ago. I just couldn't/wouldn't drive a Mustang. This isn't to say that the Coyote isn't an amazing upgrade over those silly 4.6s back in the day... or that the differences you felt between the V6s were DI vs SFI? I think the 3.7 is SFI... someone fill me in. Reviews are hard. I learned this too. Theres a fine gray line between favoritism vs 1 brand and true unbiased opinion. Cheers.
|
04-30-2012, 08:57 PM | #60 |
Drives: 2007 F150 Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 186
|
I don't think the v6 is under powered cause it makes the mustang scoot for a v6. Its just fords recent motors likes to rev, and rev, and rev some more.
__________________
|
04-30-2012, 09:05 PM | #61 | |
Banned
Drives: 2011 STi - World Rally Blue Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
I'd still give a straight line race to the Mustang, 18 more hp or not. You're talking about power like its the end all be all, but you're forgetting the Camaro has an extra 300+ lbs to tug around too. |
|
04-30-2012, 09:10 PM | #62 | |
Thread Ender
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,038
|
Quote:
|
|
04-30-2012, 09:20 PM | #63 | |
LFX is not the average V6
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
|
|
04-30-2012, 09:22 PM | #64 |
Thread Ender
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,038
|
Yeah, my bad. My comments always referred to peak numbers. Not citing where each was, albiet 6400 rpms vs 6800 rpms or whatever the case might have been. Apologies, dont want to confuse with my lack of detail. Cheers.
|
04-30-2012, 09:50 PM | #65 | |
Banned
Drives: 2011 STi - World Rally Blue Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Yes, no kidding, that's the nature of the high revving mill in the 'stang. Looking at an '11 Mustang against an '11 Camaro, it appears the Camaro is only faster than the stang up until 30 mph. There's a half second difference at 60 mph, and that holds up to the quarter too. The rolling tests all show a significant advantage to he stang as well. Somehow, I doubt that 18 hp is going to decidedly change that with the '12. I'm with Deki, I still have a really hard time believing that your bolt on v6 is destroying Mustangs when it's barely running what a stock V6 Mustang does. Does not compute. |
|
04-30-2012, 10:28 PM | #66 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
Oh boy...
__________________
|
04-30-2012, 10:41 PM | #67 |
SOCAL HT5
|
__________________
2013 ZL1 M6 - Mods-in the works
Old vehicles 2010 CGM Camaro (sold) Other Vehicles: 2008 Kawasaki ZX6R-115 RWHP in mid summer 2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS- For Sale; Lots of extras |
04-30-2012, 10:48 PM | #68 |
Drives: l99,procharged, tuned by Pat G Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Thunder Bay ON
Posts: 16
|
lol nothing better than putting a little 87 on the fire lmao
|
04-30-2012, 11:10 PM | #69 | |
LFX is not the average V6
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
i'm not the one claiming my "bolt on v6" is destroying mustangs....keep that in mind. the 2012 camaro may "only" have 19 more HP than the 2010-2011, but the power kicks in sooner. if you were to look at the dyno graphs for the 2011 and then the 2012 camaro, you would see that the LFX engine hits the higher HP and torque numbers sooner than the LLT engine does. i would even go as far as saying that i believe the 2012 camaro would beat the 2011-2012 mustang in the quarter mile and also the 1/4mile. going by both personal experience and the numbers and graphs i've seen, i would be pretty confident that i would beat an equally skilled driver in a 2011-2012 mustang in any sort of drag race. you also have to consider that the aluminum intake on the 2010-2011 camaro restricts the power quite a bit, due to it heating up the air that passes through it. people who own the 2010-2011 camaros have reported very noticeable increases in power after adding an isolator, which solves the hot intake issue. on a side note, the 2011-2012 mustang has a composite intake as well, so during the Car and Driver showdown, the mustang did not suffer from hot intake like the camaro did. what i would really like to see is Car and Driver doing another showdown between the mustang, camaro and challenger. the mustang and challenger have not had any performance changes since then and the camaro is running an entirely different engine with more HP, better powerband, and composite intake. i would be willing to bet good money that the camaro would come out on top of the 0-60 this time. i also want to stress that i'm not trying to say the LFX engine camaro is better than the LLT. there are still things that are better about the LLT, such as up-gradable headers. |
|
05-01-2012, 08:37 AM | #70 |
Thread Ender
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,038
|
Its all relative. If the camaro with bolt ons/tune launches on the stock mustang who fell asleep at the tree, and the gap only becomes bigger until the 1/4 mile ends... id probably call that destroyed too. But that's driver issue, not car. Imho... cheers.
|
|
|
|
|