05-06-2011, 09:46 AM | #1 |
Searching for the truth
|
Z28 Weight Loss
With all the talk of how to lose weight on the Z28 and how light it should be from GM, I thought I would make a new thread and say
ITS A HEAVY CAR AND WONT LOSE 100LBS SO GET OVER IT. Look folks this talk about weight isn't helping to get this car made, its hurting it. Also don't tell me what the mustang weights, its a much smaller car. in fact look at the weight of the Boss and compare to the GT. I guess all I am saying is that we need to stop filling this area with crazy diet ideas every 2 seconds and look at suspension and engine setups more.
__________________
2013 1LE 1SS RS TPW 4/29
|
05-06-2011, 10:12 AM | #2 |
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
Not only that where did this weight stuff come from anyway? I mean a 69 Z28 was basically the same weight as any other Camaro produced that year too right? JusticePete has already shown what a stock SS can do. It is very formidable, however there is room for improvement. With proper suspenson upgrades, the Z28 can be made to tear us some AZZ around a road course. If they can find some weight to drop fine, that's just icing on the cake.
|
05-06-2011, 10:20 AM | #3 |
Account Suspended
Drives: '11 Mustang GT Premium Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
The suspension is going to add a lot of weight so the key to keeping the Z28's weight down will be to find the areas that we can keep the weight relatively low. I understand that the 5th Gen is a big car and weight reduction is a difficult task but, that doesn't mean we should ignore weight all together. If were looking to produce a naturally aspirated, road going Z28 then weight is and always will be an issue. With the upcoming FE4 suspension that will be available on the 2012 Camaro SS, it is proof that GM is taking a step in the right direction to produce a well mannered Camaro for track duty. Now the task of keeping weight to a minimum, not a 100 pound reduction, is necessary more now than ever. Suspension can add an insane amount of weight but it is not unwanted weight so to speak... Heavier suspension means stability.
If GM can keep the weight of the Z28 close to the SS's curb weight, then it is a possibility that they can use a two piece rotor and still use the same diameter that the SS does. There is physical proof that a 4000+ pound Camaro can handle as Pedders did just that to a 2010 SS. As long as the 2012 Camaro didn't gain too much weight over the 2010 and 2011, it wouldn't be crazy to think that GM could develop and produce a 3800 pound Z28 Camaro. It also isn't crazy to think that GM could even manage to make a Z28 a tad bit lighter than the standard SS of say, 50 or so pounds. GM needed a benchmark car and now Ford has given it to them in the form of the Boss 302. It is only a matter of time before GM is caught in camouflage in the Detroit area in a Z28 test mule. It is probably out of the question to see a 3700lb Z28, but it would be HUGE news if GM could manage a 3799lbs Z28. I am excited all this is going on and I love the fact that there are people on this site doing the bench engineering to figure out where the Z28 would stand. I am calling for a high revving, naturally aspired LS3 to do the job. Its the lightest and most inexpensive V8 engine they got. Now the issue of developing an LS3 that can turn out the RPMs and produce the horsepower and torque needed to compete with the Boss 302. I will be looking to the Grand Am Continental Tire Grand Sport class for the new Z28... having the Z28 appear there would bring back the SCCA Trans Am series days of the pony car war and I would no longer regret being born in the wrong generation... |
05-06-2011, 11:56 AM | #4 |
Drives: GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Camaro Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 1,657
|
The 1969 SCCA rules stated a car could have a minimum weight of 2900 pounds less fuel and driver. Thats almost 500 pounds off a factory street car. Folks, these were race cars not street cars. The weight reduction isn't going to happen.
Last edited by Fightinfire921; 07-28-2012 at 04:09 PM. |
05-06-2011, 01:48 PM | #5 | |
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
Quote:
Race cars are a completely different breed. |
|
05-06-2011, 03:28 PM | #6 |
Drives: GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Camaro Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 1,657
|
I understand, my point is you're not going to get the weight loss without stripping the car. I guess it depends on what you can't and can live without.
|
05-06-2011, 03:53 PM | #7 |
Account Suspended
Drives: '11 Mustang GT Premium Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
Well then the dilemma is as simple as this; Can Camaro enthusiast live without sound deadening material, leather electric seats, touch screen Nav and a Boston sound system or would they rather live without Z28? This Z28 is only for "The" Camaro enthusiast... anyone else need not apply... Its the Z06 of the Camaro world, a serious Camaro for serious Camaro people.
|
05-06-2011, 04:25 PM | #8 |
Back on the dino-juice
Drives: '10 LS + a few more Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
|
There were things on the regular cars that couldn't be ordered on the Z's. The '67-69 Z/28's never had power steering or drum front brakes. Springs were also different from a regular small block car.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936 |
05-06-2011, 06:11 PM | #9 | |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Clyde |
|
05-06-2011, 07:02 PM | #10 |
Drives: GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Camaro Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 1,657
|
|
05-06-2011, 07:05 PM | #11 | |
Drives: GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Camaro Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 1,657
|
Quote:
|
|
05-06-2011, 08:14 PM | #12 | |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Clyde |
|
05-09-2011, 12:59 PM | #13 | |
Searching for the truth
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 1LE 1SS RS TPW 4/29
|
|
05-09-2011, 01:05 PM | #14 |
Drives: N/A Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 105
|
Most of the weight is in the engine. If they go to a V6 with turbos; then they can reduce at least 100 maybe 150 pounds from the front; which will give the Z28 a much better handling and turning characteristics.
Further, Chevrolet could if they wanted to use an aluminium frame like the ZR1 does and have carbon fiber panels. Of course we are talking another $20K if that happens but that would reduce the weigh another 200 pounds The Sigma frame is just designed heavy! So their are limits. But just doing the reducing engine from V8 to turbo V6 will make it feel fast and nimble. |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shno's House of Z | Number 3 | Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics | 17976 | 12-27-2021 12:07 PM |
Z28 or ZL1 | radz28 | Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics | 90 | 03-10-2016 10:08 AM |
2002 Z28 | dtm4192 | Member Car Journals | 40 | 06-13-2012 08:41 AM |
The 2011+ Mustang Thread | GatorBlue371 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 11874 | 08-23-2011 12:30 PM |
weight loss | CamaroSpike23 | Off-topic Discussions | 8 | 09-17-2009 07:16 PM |