03-23-2021, 09:09 AM | #29 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
OP. It is your money and your car. Do what you want. If you want a simple setup that will give you a problem free 550+ RWHP that can be installed and tuned within a few days, then keep it simple and get a supercharger. Most vendors have specials and rebates and you can get some really good deals on them. If you wanna blow up your engine and spend more money than you have to and end up with a headache, then go turbo. But at least with a turbo, it'll be really cool for the 2 weeks that it runs well before the engine logs off.
|
03-23-2021, 09:42 AM | #30 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
It matters how long I’ve been dealing with turbos & you haven’t because it adds validation to one opinion over the other. You make blanket statements based on ignorance & misconceptions. It’s been no different for the 25yrs because I’ve been dealing with people that spout off nonsense like you for that long when you don’t know what you are talking about. Not disagreeing that a belt driven supercharger isn’t easier, & perhaps cheaper (that’s a subjective extrapolation), but that depends on what the OP’s capabilities are. I can build a twin turbo system for less than I can buy a belt supercharger. That’s why I started doing it 25yrs ago. I’ve built dozens between ones for myself & others. Therefore it is, indeed, more cost effective. Can the OP? Don’t know, but I’m not going to assume his limitations. You are obviously limited in your capabilities so you project that on to others. Just because the masses do something more than something else doesn’t make it better. That’s where your limited experience on the matter disqualifies you from speaking on the subject when you do not speak from a position of experience. Perhaps you personally have done many types of blower set-ups & tuned them (I’ve done my fair share of those as well) so you can speak to that aspect, & that’s fine. It’s when you cross over & give an opinion based on a lack of knowledge that is an issue. Especially when that opinion includes false information & is incorrect. Then when you get called out on your inexperience you double down & make excuses why you don’t know what you obviously don’t know & prove your opinion is based on a lack of knowledge. What else needed to be stated? If you know why do you still speak incorrectly. |
|
03-23-2021, 10:02 AM | #31 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,011
|
|
03-23-2021, 10:07 AM | #32 | |
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro 2ss Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 11
|
Quote:
|
|
03-23-2021, 10:07 AM | #33 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
|
|
03-23-2021, 10:17 AM | #34 | ||
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
Quote:
So you know, everything he says about turbos is complete nonsense. Here is a thread by Jannetty Racing, a well respected sponsor & tuner on this site. If turbos were as bad as he makes them out to be why would Janetty even bother doing it, & then, when you watch the video listen to the praise he gives it. This is from a man with experience on the subject matter. https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=521513 |
||
03-23-2021, 10:48 AM | #35 |
Drives: On Hiatus Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Sask
Posts: 314
|
I think I'll flood general with topics that have been discussed 100x. By the end of the week there will be another idiot starting a "what exhaust to buy" thread. Any useful information that people post gets lost into the forum abyss by countless, repetitive threads. But please, continue.....
|
03-23-2021, 10:48 AM | #36 | |
Drives: Camaro 1SS Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: PA
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
2650 Magnuson Supercharger Kit = $7900.00 = 12-16 psi Bang for the buck 2300 will get you to the 550-600 rwhp. 2650 will get you there as well but to utilize the capabilities of the 2650 you will need an upgraded fuel pump. And realistically you should upgrade the "bottom end" of the engine at that point. If keeping the LT1 engine stock, keep in mind the LT1 with stock internals does not like going above 650rwhp. (research LT1 piston failure) So again how much money do you want to spend to break your engine? This is where people ask what are your end goals? If you want a 700+ monster you'll get advice on how to spend money ONCE. It'll cost more initially, but its cheaper than buying 1 part, then buying another, then breaking stuff, then spending even more. If you want a 550 - 600 rwhp street car, no need to waste money buying "over the top" products for the intended goal / budget. And one other thing not being mentioned, catalytic converters that are designed to withstand boost. If you run forced induction on stock cats, good chance they will fail and worst case scenario they clog which can cause engine failure. Thanks to EPA bs going on you won't find "catless" pipes easily right now to avoid the issue / expense. So expect another $800ish on that. |
|
03-23-2021, 11:04 AM | #37 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
|
I agree...However I believe Factory cats are fine at lower boost levels with correct tuning. Shouldn't have any issue bolting on a 2300 kit @ 6-7psi on a otherwise stock car.
I would do LT4 fuel system, low boost setup (6psi) and flex sensor. Run E60 in the summer or weekends. Then switch back to pump 93 during the week commute if it's a daily(If need be due to availability). These engines crave octane when being ran hard.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA Last edited by KingLT1; 03-23-2021 at 11:36 AM. |
03-23-2021, 11:24 AM | #38 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,562
|
I see you qualified this a bit but $7900 for the 2650 is only the INITIAL expense. There's other costs for other parts that accompany this blower and $12k is a more realistic build cost.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650. 100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O. 2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel. 4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes). 2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next. |
03-23-2021, 11:36 AM | #39 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
He’d be able to get OP squared away quite nicely. https://jannettyracing.com/collectio...2018-camaro-ss |
|
03-23-2021, 11:42 AM | #40 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Lol at the misconception of turbos in this thread. A turbo kit is going to be more expensive because right now there are only twin kits so you have to buy two of everything, if someone releases a single kit it will be around the same price or less than a supercharger. Turbos also do not stress the crank like superchargers do and running boost can be controlled via solenoid so you don't have to swap pulleys to change boost levels. I can add a turbo kit and run 3 pound wastegate springs if I want and make 3 pounds of boost, which won't blow my motor like stated. Lol.
|
03-23-2021, 12:11 PM | #41 |
|
I twin turboed a 2013 SS 1LE. I have owned 2 PD (Supercharger) factory Camaros. And I have looked into centrifical blowers and ran against them many times with friends.
The twin Turbo SS was fun but it was expensive with a mess of parts and not much low end torque. But big MPH. At Atco many I ran with said they heard me coming. But I have to say I enjoyed that 1LE more as bolt on car rather than a TT. And due to the explosive mid range power my friend put my 1LE shiny side down on a race track. Luckily my friend was fine but the 1LE no so much. Something to watch out on the Turbo front. There is the idea of an electric helper to spin the turbos and bring down the power band. Still even more complexity and $$. Centrifical blowers act a lot like Turbos but fit better under many hoods and I think overall the cheapest of the three, other opinions may vary. I think more people would enjoy the PD blower the most. A number of tuners agree. But here too opinions vary. Instant power everywhere. I would guess they are a little more expensive than centris. PDs also are the hardest on the motor, so you can't go too big without beefing up the engine like the LT4 in the ZL1. You can also use the LT4 blower to loer the cost. But it is small and generates a ton of heat unless stick with the stock pulleys. My recomendation is if you are sure a blower is in your future I would sell the current Camaro to CarMax and pick up a lightly used base ZL1. Stock they are rock solid, even with miles. And they just may be the best somewhat affordable all around supercar and GT ride on the planet. You know you want one. Used cars just makes more sense rather than torch your Camaros trade in value by installing a supercharger.
__________________
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" Last edited by Fraxum; 03-23-2021 at 12:39 PM. |
03-23-2021, 12:53 PM | #42 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
Guy that used to work for me was a big import nut, a lot of his friends as well. They were all doing big T3/T4 set ups on their little 4-bangers. He asked me one day what he should do with his little DX V-TEC. I walked over to my used pile of parts & pulled out a little T3 & said, “We’ll throw this on there for ya.” “But that’s way smaller than what everyone else is doing.” “Yup.” Made a manifold & DP for him & he picked up a used small little FMIC & an adjustable FMU off eBay. When it was done he smoked all of his buddies with that squirty bastard. While they were waiting to spool up he was gone. It was even his wife’s DD. I agree on the ZL1 as an option, though I know it’s not for everyone, for obvious reasons. |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Tags |
boost, pro charger, speed, super charger, turbo charger |
|
|