03-30-2009, 10:33 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2014 Z51 Corvette Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,349
|
Regular vs Premium
It's been said the SS V-8's will run fine on regular. What performance decrease will there be when using regular vs premium and if used regularly will regular harm the engine. Does anybody know?
|
03-30-2009, 10:35 PM | #2 |
Team Fordpower
|
The only time you'd need to run premium is if you change the tune to a 93 octane b/c of an induction change. If you're running the factory tune then paying for the more expensive gas is a waste. Essentially, regular gas will do fine.
|
03-30-2009, 10:39 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2500 hd Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AR
Posts: 297
|
the thing with reg. unlead is that the octane rating has to be atleast 87 but it can be as high as 93. and often is. i ran regular in several cars i have had that called for premium
|
03-30-2009, 10:40 PM | #4 |
Paul
|
This was asked in a previous thread.
But! The cost difference really is not that big... at most 25 cents more a gallon. Let's asume a 18 gallon tank, (just a guess, my FJ is 16.# something) $4.50 a tank. Unless you fill up every other day, it's worth the extra expense. If you're getting a SS I would get the higher octane.
__________________
|
03-30-2009, 10:42 PM | #5 |
333RWHP / 12.2sec @ 1320'
Drives: 2004 Competition Orange Mach1 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 108
|
Higher octane = higher burn = more HP
|
03-30-2009, 10:47 PM | #6 |
Drives: '08 M3 Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: calgary canada
Posts: 41
|
pardon????
The function of a higher octane gasoline is to delay the flame propogation or 'burn' to prevent detonation. I'm not sure about the L99, but the LS3 will have a 92+ octane recommendation.....just like the corvette. Sure, there will be no problem running a lower octane gas......any detonation, or ping will be picked up by the knock sensors and the computer will dial back the ignition timing....but you will definitely not get all of those 420+ horses!! So, performance affected with regular gas, definitely, engine longevity affected with regular gas, definitely not...... |
03-30-2009, 10:48 PM | #7 |
Helping Build America
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,839
|
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
|
03-30-2009, 10:54 PM | #8 |
Helping Build America
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,839
|
WTF? Research. Higher octane = slower burn
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
|
03-30-2009, 10:58 PM | #9 |
333RWHP / 12.2sec @ 1320'
Drives: 2004 Competition Orange Mach1 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 108
|
Sorry, meant higher energy to burn...not higher burn too fast for my own typing.
|
03-30-2009, 11:03 PM | #10 |
Helping Build America
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,839
|
Sorry for the flame. This has been talked about here at great length, some with knowledge and some without. Search, you will find. Some are even funny.
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
|
03-30-2009, 11:05 PM | #11 |
Drives: 00 Blazer Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,104
|
Yea eventually might need a 5th gen specific Octane guide. Basically use unleaded in the V6 and Super in the SS.
|
03-30-2009, 11:10 PM | #12 |
Drives: 08 SS trailblazer,08 Silverado Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: stanley va
Posts: 6,268
|
why not use reg and a bottle of octane boost? I run 87 in my Trailblazer SS it calls for premium but runs fine on the 87. I can definately tell a difference if I run the 93 in performance (and maybe mileage) but I can't tell for sure because my wife drives it too and she always seems to burn gas faster than I do and she says I drive fast...lol
|
03-30-2009, 11:28 PM | #13 |
Drives: Not a Camaro at this time Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,056
|
You ever notice the scam at the pumps were the 93 is like 60 cents a gallon more then the regular because they know most people look at the lowest price on the sign (also always on the top of the sign) as they pull in. You know it's a scam because then you see the guy down the block foe 12 cents more, but everyone starts the regular price very close to each other!
__________________
Order Status:
2000 8/27/15 3000 9/3/15 2000 9/22/15 (Order changed) 2016 2SS With Auto, NPP, MRC, Nav, Split 5 Spoke Bright Aluminum. |
03-30-2009, 11:31 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2010 RY 2SS/RS Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 817
|
In the LS1 running lower octane is fine for the engine but the computer retards the timing, so you lose power. No engine damage though. I just can't bring myself to save $3.00 per tank when I know it will cost me performance. I usually drive pretty calm but I do get on it at least a few times per tank.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The new Camaro V6 might be the best model of the entire lineup! | Mr. Wyndham | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 101 | 12-21-2010 07:48 PM |
Complaints from the media | 2sharp | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 03-18-2009 09:17 PM |
Premium recommended? | Rocks RS | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 37 | 08-04-2008 02:35 PM |
Premium stereo system? | c00l usmc | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 8 | 05-09-2007 02:36 PM |