02-25-2010, 12:58 PM | #1 | |
Drives: 2015 1SS RS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 772
|
Interesting Reading
Here are the results of a test done by Arrington Engines. Arrington is a WELL known engine builder for NASCAR.
Open for POLITE discussion: Quote:
|
|
02-26-2010, 06:56 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
Good Info - not much I can say....go Maggie
__________________
'10 CTS-V : LPE 650+ Package 587hp / 582tq
2.55 Upper / 8.6 Lower / ID850's / Kooks Longtubes / New Era CAI |
03-01-2010, 09:43 AM | #3 |
Petro-sexual
|
Interesting...
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
03-01-2010, 10:17 AM | #4 |
|
nice
|
03-03-2010, 01:34 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 211
|
re supercharger testing
Although this was posted in the Dodge forum, and AJ isnt here to discuss this, I have pm'd him my number so we can talk about his data. First of all this isnt a battle, nor do I intend to create,start, or defend myself in one.
The data here is entirely skewed.. The testing should have been done on the same combination,same timing tables,air fuel ratio,same octane fuel,etc.Where is this data?? There isnt. On these tests, AJ compares engine dyno numbers to chassis dyno numbers,which once again is a HUGE variable. Then there are 2 different engine combos as well. To get an accurrate test, the same car or engine on the dyno should have been used for both blowers. There are so many variables between the testing, that I wouldnt call it testing. Thanks Adam |
03-03-2010, 01:37 PM | #6 |
Agreed Adam..
Not to mention the "Blown Chevy" works for Magnusson. This is nothing more than marketing from the manufacturer. |
|
03-03-2010, 02:03 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 211
|
|
03-03-2010, 02:39 PM | #8 |
Petro-sexual
|
Well - what KB was this one?
Anyhoo - let's keep the comments respectful and let's see some numbers from KB. You guys are talkin' the talk, and I wanna' see you guys walk the walk too
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
03-03-2010, 04:02 PM | #9 | |
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
|
Quote:
First you cannot compare 2 different size blowers against each other, and I agree what was stated above, that this is an opinion based experience post and no solid data is available, so it is pretty much Pointless. But Let me say this Equal size Blowers on the same engine will be Very Close, and until this is done properly by and independent shop we may never really get the truth, then if we do, the truth will be valid for that engine combination only. I don't believe for a minute that 4 different 2300 superchargers are going to be all that different in anything other than packaging. Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com |
|
03-03-2010, 04:39 PM | #10 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 211
|
|
03-03-2010, 04:48 PM | #11 | |
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
|
|
03-03-2010, 05:00 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 211
|
........
I think you mean your opinion is that the KB will be our front, your obviously a Fan.
Opinion?? I MEANT the KB will be out front. Fan?? Yes Im a fan of the superior Kenne Bells ability to outrun all the other PD blowers out there. First you cannot compare 2 different size blowers against each other, and I agree what was stated above, that this is an opinion based experience post and no solid data is available, so it is pretty much Pointless. Agreed on the different size blowers. No substitute for displacement. But Let me say this Equal size Blowers on the same engine will be Very Close, and until this is done properly by and independent shop we may never really get the truth, then if we do, the truth will be valid for that engine combination only. Agreed.. thats why the smaller blowers wont compare. All PD blowers have their place, and for a small 8-10lb boost applictaion,almost every PD blower on the market will be close. Problem is,the other blowers wont go the distance. Its at the higher boost levels,and bigger cubic inch engines, the bigger blower will run away from the pack. Kenne Bell has all the bases covered.Whether you are small boost /stock displacement, or big boost/big displacement, Kenne Bell will support the CFM needed to get the job done. Lets also not forget the rotor designs either. Even on a same blower comparison, the rotor design will come into play as well. I don't believe for a minute that 4 different 2300 superchargers are going to be all that different in anything other than packaging. Not true. The 2.3l size is the displacement of the blower, but there are other factors that can make 1 outperform the other. Inlet restrictions, being the biggest. In the end its going to come down to the user, and combination. Which blower will work best for their needs. Some people may never want to go above 8-10lb,so the smaller units will work. The people who will eventually upgrade the engine package, and go for more power will want a blower that will grow with them. Thanks Adam |
03-03-2010, 05:03 PM | #13 | |
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
+1....Well said. Thats another reason why we laydown the track times. The MPH/wieght will show the true numbers all day long. No dyno's to elevate the numbers. Thanks Adam |
|
03-03-2010, 05:28 PM | #14 |
Drives: 775HP 2005 KBGT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 74
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An interesting Camaro (and GM) story! I just bought my 2010 Camaro! | Camarodriver | Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions | 12 | 11-28-2010 03:52 PM |
Finally got to test drive a Camaro - Interesting Story... | CUPRA | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 32 | 01-02-2010 07:22 PM |
Interesting week...Met two former presidents (Pics) | jnewberr2ssrs | Off-topic Discussions | 6 | 11-01-2009 08:57 PM |
Spotted something interesting today | marticus24 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 23 | 06-18-2009 01:11 AM |
Indy 500 Edition will not be made available for sale (+ another interesting article) | CanadianCamaro | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 3 | 03-08-2009 08:49 AM |