Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2015, 12:02 PM   #1
cal45

 
cal45's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Blue Velvet Metallic ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Orlando & Flagler Beach,FL
Posts: 1,453
Dyno #s of z/28, Ford GT350 & GT350R

For those interested - MotorTrend just published this: http://www.motortrend.com/features/p...nd-camaro-z28/

CarPeak Dyno Power Peak Dyno Torque
Shelby GT350 467 hp374 lb-ft
Camaro Z/28 469 hp438 lb-ft
Shelby GT350R 471 hp376 lb-ft



.
cal45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2015, 12:43 PM   #2
Denis


 
Denis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yorktown Heights, NY
Posts: 7,695
oooooo I want to see this go down so bad.
__________________
Denis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 08:27 AM   #3
Stingray
just can't get enough
 
Stingray's Avatar
 
Drives: a bunch of fast toys...
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SoFla
Posts: 3,605
Very good reading w/ some details & facts here:

Comparing the 2016 Ford Shelby GT350 Voodoo V8 to the best naturally aspirated performance engines of the past decade with specs and dynographs
In order of wheel horsepower:

1. Mercedes-AMG SLS Black Series M159 - 510
2. Lamborghini LP560-4 V10 - 469
3. Shelby GT350 Voodoo V8 - 467
4. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 4.0 Flat-6 - 457
5. Porsche 991 GT3 Flat-6 - 453
6. Ferrari 458 Italia V8 - 448
7. Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06 LS7 V8 - 441
8. Mercedes-AMG W204 C63 AMG Black Series M156 - 436
9. Ferrari F430 Scuderia V8 - 427
10. BMW E60 M5 S85 V10 - 426
11. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 3.8 - 419
12. Ferrari F430 V8 - 396
13. Audi R8 V8 - 352
14. BMW E92 M3 S65 V8 - 350

In order of wheel horsepower per liter:

1. Porsche 991 GT3 Flat-6 - 119.2
2. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 4.0 Flat-6 - 114.2
3. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 3.8 - 110.2
4. Ferrari 458 Italia V8 - 99.5
5. Ferrari F430 Scuderia V8 - 99.3
6. Ferrari F430 V8 - 92.0
7. Lamborghini LP560-4 V10 - 90.1
8. Shelby GT350 Voodoo V8 - 89.8
9. BMW E92 M3 S65 V8 - 87.5
10. BMW E60 M5 S85 V10 - 85.2
11. Audi R8 V8 - 83.8
12. Mercedes-AMG SLS Black Series M159 - 82.2
13. Mercedes-AMG W204 C63 AMG Black Series M156 - 70.3
14. Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06 LS7 V8 - 63.0

In order of wheel torque per liter:

1. Ferrari 458 Italia V8 - 88.4
2. Porsche 991 GT3 Flat-6 - 85.5
3. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 4.0 Flat-6 - 81.2
4. Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 3.8 Flat-6 - 78.9
5. Shelby GT350 Voodoo V8 - 71.9
6. Audi R8 V8 - 71.6
7. Ferrari F430 Scuderia V8 - 68.8
8. Ferrari F430 V8 - 67.4
9. Lamborghini LP560-4 V10 - 66.9
10. Mercedes-AMG SLS Black Series M159 - 64.2
11. BMW E60 M5 S85 V10 - 64.0
12. Mercedes-AMG W204 C63 AMG Black Series M156 - 64.0
13. BMW E92 M3 S65 V8 - 63.5
14. Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06 LS7 V8 - 59.7


Now some of you may be saying, hold on, where are the big naturally aspirated V12's from Ferrari and Lamborghini? They make more power! You are right, they do. They also come packaged in $300k plus cars. That highlights a key point here. Ford is offering by far the most naturally aspirated horsepower per dollar. It isn't even close.

Also, we wanted to compare the motor to actually attainable cars and vehicles closer in displacement and cylinder count. Obviously it is not uniform and obviously cars like the SLS Black Series are many times the cost of a GT350 but that just serves to make the GT350 look even better.

The Voodoo V8 is the third most powerful motor on the list. It makes more power and torque at the same compression ration with the same revs as the vaunted BMW S85 V10. It also does it for less money at a time when emission rules are tighter.

BMW has switched to turbo motors because they said they can no longer make high performance naturally aspirated high revving engines that meet emissions standards and still make money. Yet Ford is producing a naturally aspirated motor today that makes more power and torque than BMW's best for less money than BMW. Hey, you figure out if it is because BMW can't do it or the accountants who run the show prefer that they didn't.

What we also learn here is that Porsche by far pushes their engines harder than anyone else. They are the top dogs when it comes to extracting horsepower per liter followed by Ferrari. That said, the 991 GT3 is the champion of hp per liter and Ferrari is almost a full 20 horsepower per liter off from them. That is a large gap and Porsche deserves tremendous respect for what they do. Yes, the list is missing the 458 Speciale which certainly would be great to see and if anyone has a Dynojet run for one that Ferrari didn't pull from the web let us know.

Ford is offering the best balance of revs, horsepower, and torque for the money in this comparison. The Voodoo V8 is truly elite only giving up two wheel horsepower to the Lamborghini V10 which comes in a car over $200k while also offering more torque. Only the SLS Black Series M159 tops it significantly but it is working with another liter of displacement and costs $300k+.

The Voodoo V8 truly is world class. Ford can not get enough credit for what they have built.
Source: http://www.boostaddict.com/content.p...and-dynographs
Stingray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 09:39 AM   #4
HeavyIOM
 
HeavyIOM's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS, 2000 Pontiac Formula
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 509
Hmm competition makes everyone better. I like what I am seeing.
HeavyIOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 09:44 AM   #5
ZYBORG
Lets roll...
 
ZYBORG's Avatar
 
Drives: 14'
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: TX/S.FL
Posts: 1,496
The argument of hp or tq per liter is ignorant.
__________________
ZYBORG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:17 AM   #6
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZYBORG View Post
The argument of hp or tq per liter is ignorant.
How so? It is a pretty good measure of the power density (efficiency) of the motor, and if you design for a particular displacement (as Porsche does), then it allows you to keep footprints smaller and weights down.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:35 AM   #7
ZYBORG
Lets roll...
 
ZYBORG's Avatar
 
Drives: 14'
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: TX/S.FL
Posts: 1,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
How so? It is a pretty good measure of the power density (efficiency) of the motor, and if you design for a particular displacement (as Porsche does), then it allows you to keep footprints smaller and weights down.
A better measure would be a comparison of hp/tq per motor dimension and weight.

Here is an example of that, two ford motors... On the left is a 4.6 and on the right is a 5.0

__________________
ZYBORG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:59 AM   #8
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZYBORG View Post
A better measure would be a comparison of hp/tq per motor dimension and weight.

Here is an example of that, two ford motors... On the left is a 4.6 and on the right is a 5.0

Those are valid metrics as well. Think about some of the markets where these cars sell. They actually tax displacement, the weight and size of the motor alone won't impact that. They have to engineer a total solution and hp/liter is part of that overall solution. No one metric (even weight to power) give you everything you need to design a good performance car.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 02:42 PM   #9
xc_SS/RS


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: somewhere in MD
Posts: 4,883
Really curious and anxious to see how the Z/28 and the GT350 models stack up. Goes to show just how efficient the GM drivetrain is compared to the Fords.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS
Z/28 intake, NW, FAST 102, speed engineering LT's, some exhaust, ATI -10% pulley, GM flex fuel injectors, DSX flex fuel sensor, MGW shifter, HP Tuners, some suspension work, stickers and a little weight loss. 12.63 @113.53
xc_SS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 09:05 PM   #10
matt55

 
matt55's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
The ls7 is making +400 whp for less the 2000 rpm.
The Voodoo is making +400 whp for more than 2500 rpm .
+700 rpm wider power band is nothing to write off , if you tell yourself different your just being a fanboi.
Attached Images
 
__________________
10.8@130.8 610 whp, CAI, 2.5, E85, id850 on street tires.
matt55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 09:46 PM   #11
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
How so? It is a pretty good measure of the power density (efficiency) of the motor, and if you design for a particular displacement (as Porsche does), then it allows you to keep footprints smaller and weights down.
That doesn't change the fact that it means nothing for a car.

You could be making 342 hp/L ... but if its from a 750cc engine you're only making 257 hp. Meanwhile, even a lowly 39 hp/L engine can get you 400+ hp if you make it big enough. Which one will result in a faster car? The one with more power, right?

If you're thinking 'well, it depends on how much the engine weighs' I would agree. But doesn't that then defeat the logic of hp/L being an important engine metric? Making the one of actual importance hp/lb?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Those are valid metrics as well. Think about some of the markets where these cars sell. They actually tax displacement, the weight and size of the motor alone won't impact that. They have to engineer a total solution and hp/liter is part of that overall solution. No one metric (even weight to power) give you everything you need to design a good performance car.
I can't think that Ford developed the Voodoo because of displacement taxes (which are downright idiotic). Odds are 80+% of the GT350's are going to be sold in North America. And there aren't going to be all that many sold here to begin with. So it would be an enormous investment to make a small number of cars (which I'm sure are going to be pretty pricey in foreign markets anyways) a little more affordable to a few customers. The bean counters at Ford are more responsible than that.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:33 PM   #12
TheReaper

 
TheReaper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mobile Al
Posts: 750
7.0L vs 5.2L , that little Ford engine is putting up some good numbers.
__________________
2018 GT 10R80-355
TheReaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2015, 08:09 AM   #13
rayhawk

 
rayhawk's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt55 View Post
The ls7 is making +400 whp for less the 2000 rpm.
The Voodoo is making +400 whp for more than 2500 rpm .
+700 rpm wider power band is nothing to write off , if you tell yourself different your just being a fanboi.
Well the LS7 redlines at 7000, and crosses 400 whp at 4800, so that is actually a 2200 rpm spread, the voodoo pulls over 400 whp from 5700 to 8200 redline, or 2500 rpm.
__________________
rayhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2015, 08:40 AM   #14
BigBlock69RS
Ed
 
BigBlock69RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 AGM Camaro 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 951
Power under the curve!
__________________
BigBlock69RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.