Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics > Engine | Exhaust | Bolt-On | Drivetrain Modifications


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2014, 11:24 AM   #29
ChocoTaco369
145lb Powerlifter
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RS LS3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,146
I would much rather have an LSA than an LT1, but that's just me. The motors are nothing alike. Which would you rather work on?
ChocoTaco369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:26 AM   #30
hognutz


 
hognutz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: tangent or
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
What's the difference between doing an upper pulley and lower pulley? Is there an added benefit of doing one over the other? Would a smaller upper pulley cause any belt slip at all?

Also, is it safe to rev this engine to 6500 rpm or so with a pulley swap? I've seen dynographs go past the stock 6200 rpm redline once the car was tuned.
my engine is set for 6500 rpm right now but I an not at real high boost.

google the boost charts. larger lower give you more rpm, smaller upper give you more rpm.

lower intalls quicker but costs more. depending on your reline though you have a blower RPM. I read the reconened blower RPM was 23,000 so the combination of the lower and upper get you the closest to this. some will say you can go more like 26000 rpm.

some will say the upper can cause belt slip but many say this is BS.

I did 10% lower to start with you don't have to change out any brackets or idlers to do this. I was not changing injectos at the time so it made sense to me.

there is alot of information out ther from lingenfeltor or weapon x etc.

if you jumpoing in right from the start the upper 2.4" pulley is the cheapest solution but would most likely require injectors right out the gate so you have to budget for that.

it will all make sense after you read it for a wile.

look over this thread

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=270334

I only had som much coin to start with some my mods are kind of coming in stages.
__________________
shopping for 2017+1le or zl1
2009 CTS-V -sold
2015 Hellcat-sold
2013 ZL1 -sold
2007 Z06- sold
2014 Chrysler 300
2011 Duramax 8" lift, deleted tuned
hognutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:27 AM   #31
ChocoTaco369
145lb Powerlifter
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RS LS3
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
This might be a stupid question, but why not set the car to shift at 6500 rpm? Power doesn't drop off, looking at the dynographs that I've seen. Wouldn't it be beneficial to wind out the gears a little longer since it continues making power up top?
If you set the shift points to the limiter, you'd be bouncing off the rev limiter all the time. The trans doesn't shift exactly at 6100. I've seen variances of 100 rpm's. It's set that way to give a buffer. If you want to set your shift points to 6500 rpms, you'd have to up to limiter to probably something like 6800 and now you're really going to be taxing the stock parts.
ChocoTaco369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:31 AM   #32
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post
If you set the shift points to the limiter, you'd be bouncing off the rev limiter all the time. The trans doesn't shift exactly at 6100. I've seen variances of 100 rpm's. It's set that way to give a buffer. If you want to set your shift points to 6500 rpms, you'd have to up to limiter to probably something like 6800 and now you're really going to be taxing the stock parts.
But in a manual car lets say, you'd be able to rev it out closer to 6500 rpms? I remember seeing a spec sheet that stated the rev limiter on the LSA crate engine was 6600 rpms. I can't remember where I found it.
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:32 AM   #33
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post
I would much rather have an LSA than an LT1, but that's just me. The motors are nothing alike. Which would you rather work on?
Yeah, there's more potential in the LSA without having to go into the engine. It already comes for a blower, and the engine is already set up for boost. I'd rather add a little boost to a car that is already set up for boost, then boost an engine that wasn't designed for boost and has a compression ratio of 11:5:1
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 11:54 AM   #34
wirebender
 
wirebender's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1, A10, White, sunroof, nav
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Garner, NC
Posts: 720
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirebender View Post
Perhaps this chart from LPE will help.
This past Saturday I ran an 11.6 @ 124.6 on stock tires. probably ~13-14 lbs. boost. When I add lower pulley the supercharger will be just about maxed out.
AUTO...tuned by Ryan @ RPM. He also set rev limit at 6800 I think but tranny shifts way before that so I never get that high.
wirebender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 01:03 PM   #35
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirebender View Post
AUTO...tuned by Ryan @ RPM. He also set rev limit at 6800 I think but tranny shifts way before that so I never get that high.
I'm feeling very strongly about the ZL1. Good chance I'll be joining you fellas soon If I can reliably trap 125 in the quarter mile with bolt ons without issue or having to constantly bring my car into the shop like I had to with my G8, I'll be quite happy
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:11 PM   #36
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
I'm feeling very strongly about the ZL1. Good chance I'll be joining you fellas soon If I can reliably trap 125 in the quarter mile with bolt ons without issue or having to constantly bring my car into the shop like I had to with my G8, I'll be quite happy
The ZL1 is very stout in the stock form. The stock clutch won't make it with drag racing when you add a lot of power, everything else is pretty good. You can always use more cooling.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:24 PM   #37
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessrayo View Post
The ZL1 is very stout in the stock form. The stock clutch won't make it with drag racing when you add a lot of power, everything else is pretty good. You can always use more cooling.
If I had to pick one thing to be the weak link, I'd rather have it be the clutch then anything that has to do with the engine or transmission. From what I've been reading, the LSA engine is tough as all hell. It should be able to handle 14 pounds of boost for a long time reliably (I hope).
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:56 PM   #38
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
If I had to pick one thing to be the weak link, I'd rather have it be the clutch then anything that has to do with the engine or transmission. From what I've been reading, the LSA engine is tough as all hell. It should be able to handle 14 pounds of boost for a long time reliably (I hope).
As long as you can deal with the heat generated with 14 pounds of boost the rest of the motor and drivetrain should be fine. And, if you start to get too much intake heat the car just reduces timing and power until you cool back down.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 06:58 PM   #39
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessrayo View Post
As long as you can deal with the heat generated with 14 pounds of boost the rest of the motor and drivetrain should be fine. And, if you start to get too much intake heat the car just reduces timing and power until you cool back down.
What can I do to offset or at least reduce the effects of this? Any recommendations?
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 07:25 PM   #40
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
What can I do to offset or at least reduce the effects of this? Any recommendations?
Reservoir (bigger is better), heat exchanger (bigger is not necessarily better), bigger pump. If you are primarily drag racing I would consider a chiller.

The stock pump is very good but there is one pump that is much better...be prepared for sticker shock though.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2014, 08:29 PM   #41
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessrayo View Post
Reservoir (bigger is better), heat exchanger (bigger is not necessarily better), bigger pump. If you are primarily drag racing I would consider a chiller.

The stock pump is very good but there is one pump that is much better...be prepared for sticker shock though.
Yes, mostly drag racing but also spirited driving. Not really lap after lap at Laguna Seca type stuff.

I'm sorry if I sound stupid, but I'm very new to FI, and never modified a car with a supercharger. Bigger reservoir for what exactly? The supercharger is liquid cooled?

I'm bracing myself for the sticker shock, hit me!
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 10:58 AM   #42
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdevil77 View Post
Bigger reservoir for what exactly? The supercharger is liquid cooled?

I'm bracing myself for the sticker shock, hit me!
The supercharger system is liquid cooled but the stock system has no reservoir, it just circulates the water between the heat exchangers in the airflow under the supercharger and in the grill of the car. Adding a reservoir gives an increased capacity to store and dissipate heat.

Here is a link to the pump. Most people replace the heat exchanger in the grill of the car first but my personal experience has lead me to believe that you may get more cooling gains from the pump.

http://www.lingenfelter.com/mm5/merc...=#.Uxim6oVfTJM
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.