You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
11-10-2009, 12:27 AM
|
#1 |
 Drives: 2010 camaro 1lt RS Red Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mercersburg Pennsylvania
Posts: 80
|
camaro v-6 Vs 99-04 Mustang gt
so i looked at the numbers and i think the camaro would win what do you all think? 2004 Ford Mustang GT 6.3 0-60 14.8 1/4 mile time
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 01:50 AM
|
#2 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: BMW 6 series Vert Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Right Here
Posts: 979
|
The hard part would be finding an un-modded Mustang from those years.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 02:37 AM
|
#3 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,752
|
The Mustang GT would win stock vs stock.
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
  |
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 04:29 AM
|
#4 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
they are close... could be a drivers race...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:04 AM
|
#5 |
         Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
If it's a 5 speed a Mustang GT of that year should run in the mid/high 5s to 60 and the 1/4 mile in the very low 14s with a few in high 13s. If it is an automatic though, go for it, I was able to pace those in my old LT1 Caprice.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:15 AM
|
#6 |
 
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
It'll be close, but you should have him. Stock, as said earlier its tough to find one that has nothing done to it.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 10:49 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 01:37 PM
|
#8 |
|
It would probably be a driver's race. I had a run in with one about that same model year and it wasn't close at all. I'm sure the V6 would definitely be neck and neck with it.
|
|
|
|
|
11-10-2009, 03:43 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 1993 Rustang Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 941
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 12:04 AM
|
#10 |
|
|
Question:
What's going to accelerate faster? A Stock 2010 Mustang GT WITHOUT Track Pack and WITHOUT the 3.55 axle ratio. A Bone stock GT. vs. a 6 Cylinder Camaro 2LT??? The axle ratio makes a big difference from what I'm reading. |
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 12:28 AM
|
#11 |
|
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
A bone stock 2010 would run up and down the track with a lt camaro. Its not all about horsepower, even though that and the price are close, the camaro v6 is not in the same comparison as a 2010 mustang gt.
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 05:32 AM
|
#12 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
This thread was about 1999-2004 Mustang GT, NOT about 2005-2010 Mustangs... BIG DIFFERENCE!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 08:15 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
Haha, exactly. Hence why I was a bit "terse" with my response to the above poster |
|
|
|
|
|
11-11-2009, 10:16 AM
|
#14 |
|
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
IMHO 5 speed 99-04 GT, its a vin for the GT, if it's an auto, it'll be a good run for a V6 Camaro. The Camaros has a decent HP advantage, but the GT has a big torque advantage and around a 500 pound weight advantage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro Product Manager - interview | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 11 | 04-04-2012 06:10 PM |
| Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |
| Pedders Suspension Benchmark Track Testing and New Jersey Track Day | Info@PeddersUSA.com | USA - NY / NJ / PA | 35 | 10-26-2009 05:20 PM |
