03-26-2011, 01:18 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
ya i really wonder why they didn't do that. it just doesn't look good when people say its made with cheaper steal.
|
03-26-2011, 01:19 AM | #16 | |
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Yeh...the appearance makes a lot of sense especially for those who like the look underneath their car at shiny pipes. |
|
03-26-2011, 03:44 AM | #17 |
SoCal C5 Family Member
|
Regardless of the material you get similar performance with similar weight across the board with cat backs. I went with Flowmaster because they look good, the sound good, and they are half the price of others. I feel i made a good decision.
__________________
"Discovered by the Germans in 1904, they named it San Diego, which of course in German means a whale's ******." |
03-26-2011, 08:26 AM | #18 |
雪の玉
Drives: '22 Z71 RST Silverado Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South
Posts: 3,415
|
Everyone has got their preferences. What works/appeals to one person doesn't work/appeal to another. Personally I don't like flowmaster. The drone I had in my Mustang GT was too much, so I switched to Magnaflow. It's much more tolerable. As for the SS I went with Borla. Yes, a little more expensive, but money well spent. No matter which exhaust you get, it's better than the heavy stock one.
|
03-26-2011, 08:34 AM | #19 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 89 IROC 350 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Back roads, southern Ohio
Posts: 12,504
|
I love mine but they aren't pretty. I hope all the people lying on their backs looking at the bottom of my car don't mind. I don't wash or polish my under carriage either.
|
03-26-2011, 08:57 AM | #20 |
Drives: '17 Fifty SS - '18 Traverse Redline Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,616
|
I agree with this 100% ..... and thats why I got the flowmasters myself, and I like the sound, and 10 year warranty
__________________
2017 Camaro SS -"FIFTY"
Mods: "93 Octane" |
03-26-2011, 09:25 AM | #21 |
Retired Navy
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NW of DFW
Posts: 915
|
Stainless is an alloy. T-304 is a better grade of stainless than T-409, but at the same time, T-409 will last longer than you would ever need it to. T-304 has 18%-20% chromium and 8%-10% nickel. The higher nickel content is what gives it the higher lustre. T-409 has 10.5%-11.75% chromium and .5% nickel. That is why it has the golden dull look. A magnet will not stick to T-304 but will stick to T-409.
|
03-26-2011, 09:29 AM | #22 |
Drives: 2011 2SS RS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
|
It is a full stainles exhaust. Just 409 Stainless instead of 304.
|
03-26-2011, 10:05 AM | #23 |
The BBOMG fill-in husband
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS 1LE AKA V1LE Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 4,458
|
Mine were only $409 shipped, love that they are black and are half as heavy.
__________________
UPSTATE C5 MEMBER
|
03-26-2011, 10:41 AM | #24 | |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
|
Quote:
You are correct !!!
__________________
|
|
03-26-2011, 04:11 PM | #25 |
Account Suspended
|
|
03-27-2011, 07:25 AM | #26 |
Which model Flowmaster is the right one for the L99 with GFX?
|
|
03-28-2011, 03:39 PM | #27 |
Drives: RED@2SS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UAE
Posts: 1,372
|
and what's the deffrent between hashpower and catback (
in hp and sound ) ?
__________________
|
03-28-2011, 04:58 PM | #28 |
Drives: 11 Camaro SS,05 Vette Z51,76 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Joliet, IL
Posts: 370
|
I think this is what your looking for PN 817487 - For 2010-2011 Camaro 6.2L models with Factory Ground Effects Package |
|
|
|
|