04-04-2013, 08:05 PM | #169 |
|
OMG This FAILTROCITY of a thread is still here.
OK I just want to know when this detune is going down. Lets get that done ASAP!!!! When the engine grenades (which will happen fairly quickly when you detune it) bcuz your son floors it I call DIBS on the video on that camera you installed. The impending accident that WILL HAPPEN that I honestly hope your son walks away from unharmed is definitely going to be a sent in for a 1 hour special on Dumbest Stuff on Wheels!!! Subject of the show: Why irresponsible dumb parents shouldn't buy there irresponsible kids high performance cars. |
04-04-2013, 08:53 PM | #170 | |
Mach 5
Drives: 13 ZL1 IOM #115 87 Grand National Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 181
|
Simple De-Tune
Quote:
I'm late arrival to this interesting thread to say the least - but will offer you up the simplest "de-tune" I can think of... Ready for it?? Screw a 2 X 4 (or other suitable size wood/metal item) into the floorboard directly under the gas pedal to limit throttle to a top speed that you desire. Problem solved & warranty remains in tact!! |
|
04-04-2013, 10:06 PM | #171 | |
The magic smoke genie....
Drives: Jewels (2010 RJT 1SS) Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,294
|
Quote:
Please look into this before you have anyone mess with your ECU. It's easier to switch back and easier to hide for warranty purposes. Dealers will know if the ECU has been tampered with and can void your drivetrain warranty. |
|
04-05-2013, 08:09 AM | #172 |
Drives: 2017 Corvette Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 258
|
Have a tuner reduce the maximum throttle rotation position to a value less than 100%
|
04-05-2013, 09:25 AM | #173 |
Tony
|
I have a better idea. Buy him a friggin Honda.
__________________
|
04-05-2013, 09:47 AM | #174 |
Go VOLS!!!!!
Drives: ZL1 #1344 VR, M6 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ardmore,Al.
Posts: 279
|
He could take the "ZL1" badges off. That would shave off 150Hp easy.
__________________
1.GOD
2.Family 3.Camaro........& the TENNESSEE VOLS!!! |
04-05-2013, 10:23 AM | #175 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 Camaro Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 78
|
There was a key switch on a MY corvette that kept the car in mild or wild so anyone driving the car could not use all the horsepower.This corvette had an engine built by Mercury Marine and I think it was around 1995,I'm sure you can find the MY by looking it up. If my memory serves me on this the intake butterfly was kept from opening all the way and limiting the engine output. Just maybe some of this modification could work on the ZL1. Good Luck!
|
04-05-2013, 03:13 PM | #176 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Conv. Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 131
|
The maggie supercharger had a vacuum operated valve that regulated the boost, which could be simply held open with a plastic wire-tie. Possibly the ZL1 has a similar valve?
I haven't even taken the plastic cover off yet to look around, so I am not sure. If such of a valve exists on the ZL1, then keeping it open prevents any boost - essentially turning off the benefit of the supercharger. |
04-05-2013, 04:15 PM | #177 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Conv. & 2002 V-6 Conv. Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bonifay, FL
Posts: 25
|
I know this may seem outlandish but how about a repower with a 6.2 G.M. Diesel. I have a spare 6.2 diesel, HP rating is 165 HP. My target detune HP was 350 HP or so. Many of you said that it's not a good idea to detune this engine, it may be a GM Sin as well... some seem satanic about the ZL1. The ZL1 Eng. would be preserved and reinstalled at a later date. The repowered ZL1 would be a novel idea (diesel power). The fuel mileage would be much better (28.876 MPG est'd.) but the power output would be way (165 HP) down, so it's a trade-off. I think diesel lake (side) pipes would be the best way to go, like the 427 Ford Cobra's in the 60's. I had thought's of repowering (01 Apr.) with a Solar Turbine (320 HP) or Twin Pack's with 640 HP but the installation would be problematic (engineering wise). Now, this (specific) thread is not for the serious reader just intended as fun (so smile) & food for thought for forward/ backward thinkers.
N/A 293 888 2611 Last edited by HighFly27; 04-05-2013 at 04:27 PM. Reason: mistakes |
04-05-2013, 04:43 PM | #178 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 Camaro Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 78
|
The engine that resulted from that Corvette/Lotus collaboration was called the LT5. It was an all-aluminum-block V-8 with the same displacement, 5.7 liters or 350 cu. in., and the same bore centers (4.4 in.) as the normal Corvette's L98 pushrod engine. It had an unusual low-rpm/high-rpm intake tract (fort the time) on top of the engine, with solenoids that closed eight of the 16 intake runners and shut off the fuel injectors anytime the engine operated at less than at full-throttle. At full-throttle, all 16 intake runners and fuel injectors were open for business. A valet key in the instrument panel kept the engine in the low-power mode, making only about 250 hp. The LT5, intended to run at much higher rpm than the pushrod engine, was rated at 375 hp at 6000 rpm. It was among the most potent V-8 engines in the world at the time and just 5 hp shy of the Ferrari Testarossa. By comparison, the normal L98 Corvette engine was rated at only 250 hp at 4400 rpm. In 1989, Chevrolet built a few Corvettes with the LT-5 engine as a test fleet. Once they were satisfied with the engine's performance, drivability and durability, the Corvette team had to find a way to build the engines here in the U.S., instead of Lotus doing the job in England. Mercury Marine, which had by that time built thousands of GM small-block V8s for pleasure boats, was selected to build the LT-5 engine at the Mercury plant in Stillwater, Okla.
Read more: Inside the History of Corvette's ZR1: Slide Show - Popular Mechanics |
|
|
|
|