Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2018, 09:44 PM   #1
Fraxum


 
Fraxum's Avatar
 
Drives: a M6 LT1 ordered From Becky!!!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,520
Send a message via AIM to Fraxum
Challenger 1320 vs Mustang GT vs Camaro SS

We have a new competitor in the mix. The Challenger 1320. Seats are optional and Dodge is claiming the 1320 will run 11.7 and the extra seats are optional. And it comes with the Dodge drag racing goodies. Man Dodge sure knows how to leverage this old hoss for maximum play. $46K + seats.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/mi...solation-prize
__________________
Fraxum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 02:26 AM   #2
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
This looks interesting. Of course, I prefer the Hellcat or Redeye. But you can't argue how impressive this car will be.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 10:42 AM   #3
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
On every forum you hear from drag racers asking for a purpose built and lightweight drag racing option... finally someone is listening.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 05:09 PM   #4
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
On every forum you hear from drag racers asking for a purpose built and lightweight drag racing option... finally someone is listening.
I thought the GTs were doing low mid 10s all bone stock with boost, meth, slicks, LTs, gutted interior...
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 05:39 PM   #5
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
I thought the GTs were doing low mid 10s all bone stock with boost, meth, slicks, LTs, gutted interior...
No, GT's with Boost,slicks and 4100lb race weights run in the 9's these days....and the drivers might use meth , but the cars don't because they don't come with a DI only fuel system.

Last edited by FastCarFanBoy; 10-15-2018 at 06:26 PM.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2018, 11:20 PM   #6
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
No, GT's with Boost,slicks and 4100lb race weights run in the 9's these days....and the drivers might use meth , but the cars don't because they don't come with a DI only fuel system.
Ah ok. That's impressive for a completely bone stock GT with nothing except boost,slicks and 4100lb race weights to run in the 9's just like any other V8 Muscle/Pony car with those same mods would do...the fact that a Mustang can do it just like everything else out there is extremely impressive.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:40 AM   #7
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,023
I think it's a cool package and cool that Dodge is offering it for the 1/4 crowd. They know they don't have a corner carver, so make a straightline package.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:52 AM   #8
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I think it's a cool package and cool that Dodge is offering it for the 1/4 crowd. They know they don't have a corner carver, so make a straightline package.
They don't need a corner carver, their Challenger sales are just fine . A street/strip focus to track would likely hurt the present sales.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 08:54 AM   #9
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Ah ok. That's impressive for a completely bone stock GT with nothing except boost,slicks and 4100lb race weights to run in the 9's just like any other V8 Muscle/Pony car with those same mods would do...the fact that a Mustang can do it just like everything else out there is extremely impressive.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 09:19 AM   #10
smokinzx14r
 
smokinzx14r's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 1SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
I thought the GTs were doing low mid 10s all bone stock with boost, meth, slicks, LTs, gutted interior...
Well my 2015 GT , NOT gutted , stock exhaust ran 9.95 with nothing but a procharger ho kit on e85 and drag radials .. Its pretty easy to do and cheap too ..
Attached Images
  
smokinzx14r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 10:10 AM   #11
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Ah ok. That's impressive for a completely bone stock GT with nothing except boost,slicks and 4100lb race weights to run in the 9's just like any other V8 Muscle/Pony car with those same mods would do...the fact that a Mustang can do it just like everything else out there is extremely impressive.
Ok so you’re agreeing with me, 9’s not 10’s for the GT...cool, however it seems the Camaro needs more mods to get there looking over the fast list. Internal mods or a converter.... funny the torque monster needs the converter and the gutless wonder doesn’t.

My car would be #4 on the C6G fast list... with less mods...on 93 no crank and it did it almost 4yrs ago so welcome to the party.

Last edited by FastCarFanBoy; 10-16-2018 at 10:22 AM.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 11:53 AM   #12
Fraxum


 
Fraxum's Avatar
 
Drives: a M6 LT1 ordered From Becky!!!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,520
Send a message via AIM to Fraxum
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
Ok so you’re agreeing with me, 9’s not 10’s for the GT...cool, however it seems the Camaro needs more mods to get there looking over the fast list. Internal mods or a converter.... funny the torque m gtonster needs the converter and the gutless wonder doesn’t.
60
My car would be #4 on the C6G fast list... with less mods...on 93 no crank and it did it almost 4yrs ago so welcome to the party.
I'm with you guys on the Coyote is faster with less than the Camaro. My buddies full weight 2017 base GT auto has run a 10.304@137 with a Slightly over pullied Paxton, tune, injectors, and DRs with a 1.7 60' at Atco. He now has added a convertor and he is getting used to it. He has also taken the extra seats out. Will he touch the 9s this fall? Maybe.

But back to the 1320 Dodge. What would it take to get this NA car that weighs as much as a mid size suv into the 9s? And I hear the 392s are delicate.
__________________
Fraxum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 03:01 PM   #13
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
Ok so you’re agreeing with me, 9’s not 10’s for the GT...cool, however it seems the Camaro needs more mods to get there looking over the fast list. Internal mods or a converter.... funny the torque monster needs the converter and the gutless wonder doesn’t.
No. I'm not agreeing with you. I've seen way too many examples over the years of people lying about their mods, hiding mods, not fully disclosing their mods, conveniently forgetting to mention certain mods, etc, especially from the Mustang crowd, to ever believe a Mustang with similar mods is faster than a Camaro. From what I've seen at the track, Mustangs with similar mods have been running the exact same or similar times as Camaros.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
My car would be #4 on the C6G fast list... with less mods...on 93 no crank and it did it almost 4yrs ago so welcome to the party.
Your car is not a Camaro so it wouldn't even be on the list.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 03:53 PM   #14
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
No. I'm not agreeing with you. I've seen way too many examples over the years of people lying about their mods, hiding mods, not fully disclosing their mods, conveniently forgetting to mention certain mods, etc, especially from the Mustang crowd, to ever believe a Mustang with similar mods is faster than a Camaro. From what I've seen at the track, Mustangs with similar mods have been running the exact same or similar times as Camaros.



Your car is not a Camaro so it wouldn't even be on the list.
Weak AF.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.