New cam install in progress... - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

litle88 · 09-22-2012, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeSS

the installers fault on that pump btw, not GM. come on it fails right after he handles it.

give this a read.

You must be the oil pulp police!!

Every failed GM pump thread your in lol.

Maybe you should be keeping tabs on this lol.

Hey if he would of put a melling he'd be ok.

Congrats on your build, what kind of dyno was it?
I'm glad your not caught up in dyno numbers. With good air coming up take it you should take it to the track.

mikeSS · 09-22-2012, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by litle88

You must be the oil pulp police!!

Every failed GM pump thread your in lol.

Maybe you should be keeping tabs on this lol.

Hey if he would of put a melling he'd be ok.

Congrats on your build, what kind of dyno was it?
I'm glad your not caught up in dyno numbers. With good air coming up take it you should take it to the track.

right and if he didn't install a cam. he would also be ok.

litle88 · 09-22-2012, 05:58 PM

Lmao

litle88 · 09-22-2012, 06:01 PM

But that's why I always say, if your going into it, always "upgrade". But hey we live and learn. Do maybe some will SEARCH & READ and always get a melling when cammin.

Ravener · 09-23-2012, 09:07 AM

Graph printout shows Dynojet. Now I'm trying to ascertain where I can free up more power. I had a pretty radical N/A H/C 06 GTO that put out 490 and this feels just as strong. Thinking I may need to port the heads and intake to open her up...(and yes shoulda done that when the motor was open I know I know..). Just seemed like the G cam had better results from other's experiences. Could be tuning as Rod10269 mentioned. Car has good driveability currently so perhaps the tradeoff would be more power = difficult manners?

09-22-2012, 05:58 PM	#17
litle88 V8 Lounge member #2 Drives: 2001 Ws6 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Burbank,IL Posts: 6,373	Lmao __________________ 2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.

09-22-2012, 06:01 PM	#18
litle88 V8 Lounge member #2 Drives: 2001 Ws6 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Burbank,IL Posts: 6,373	But that's why I always say, if your going into it, always "upgrade". But hey we live and learn. Do maybe some will SEARCH & READ and always get a melling when cammin. __________________ 2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.

09-23-2012, 09:07 AM	#19
Ravener Drives: 2010 2SS RS M6 Blk Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Md Posts: 287	Graph printout shows Dynojet. Now I'm trying to ascertain where I can free up more power. I had a pretty radical N/A H/C 06 GTO that put out 490 and this feels just as strong. Thinking I may need to port the heads and intake to open her up...(and yes shoulda done that when the motor was open I know I know..). Just seemed like the G cam had better results from other's experiences. Could be tuning as Rod10269 mentioned. Car has good driveability currently so perhaps the tradeoff would be more power = difficult manners? __________________ 418 LS3, custom cam, tuned vararam, ported tb, Kooks stepped LT's, Kooks Hi-Flo cats and 2.5" street sleeper cat back, 18% UDP, crap stock rear tire size 12.03 @ 117 mph.