Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2009, 05:12 PM   #15
StoutFiles
 
StoutFiles's Avatar
 
Drives: Black/Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 733
I thought the manual was faster in the 0-60?
StoutFiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:18 PM   #16
garagelogic
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCamaro69 View Post
I'm just as interested in slalom speed and cornering G's and braking.
Me, too. So throw up some of those numbers as well.

I'll say:

Slalom Speed: 63.2mph
200ft skidpad: .88g
Braking (70-0): 156ft

Last edited by garagelogic; 01-07-2009 at 07:48 AM.
garagelogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:19 PM   #17
Xanthos
PWA Relapse
 
Xanthos's Avatar
 
Drives: Formerly-Stick
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 12,588
I thought I read somewhere that the SS pulls .97 g's on the skidpad?

Personally I'm thinking about 13.9-14.1 for the V8 and 12.9-13.1 for the V8. Better with really good drivers (for both engines).

0-60 will be about 5.8 for the V6, about 4.6 for the V8 manual and about 4.5 for the V8 auto.
- Xanthos
__________________

2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic

Xanthos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:21 PM   #18
Rallyman6
Member
 
Rallyman6's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS IOM, Wht Stripes, Roof
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wellesley Hills, MA
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF w00t View Post
G8 GXP does the 1/4 mile in 13.0 secs and 0-60 in 4.6s. The SS will beat that mark, at least by a little. Mags were getting 4.4 in the GXP according to autoblog.
The Camaro is lighter than the GXP and the GXP hp is rated at 415hp - where as the LS3 MT6 Camaro is rated at 422. I am hoping for at least 4.5sec with launch control.

Why does everyone think the LS3 with MT6 (422hp) will be slower than the L99 (400hp) Auto?
Because the auto is geared lower 1st thru 4th, this may make up for the difference?
__________________

2SS/RS IOM, Wht Stripes, 6MT, IO Interior, Roof, Eibach Sways, BC Coilovers, BMR Swing arms,Barton Short Shift, BBK LT's, GMPP exhaust, Hi-Flow Cats, MAST Stage 2 Cam, CAI = 470RWHP
Rallyman6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:27 PM   #19
96CAMaro
 
96CAMaro's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
V6 -- 0-60 5.9s, 1/4 14.3
V8 -- 0-60 4.6s, 1/4 12.7-12.8 (anything slower than I will get a Corvette instead. There is no way I am going to be on par with a 4.6L Mustang with over a 100hp difference [422-315 = 107hp]).
96CAMaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:28 PM   #20
Rodrunner
Senior Member
 
Rodrunner's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS/RS, '06 350Z
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: So. Maryland
Posts: 2,333
Manual V8 - 4.6....13.3....108
Auto V8 - 4.9....13.4....106

Mustang is 13.8 and you must consider the sizeable weight difference.
__________________
2SS/RS - Black/Black - CGM Rally Stripes - Auto - VIN 10171
Rodrunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:29 PM   #21
96CAMaro
 
96CAMaro's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by garagelogic View Post
Okay, we all know the magazines will have their as-delivered-from-the-factory cars soon and we'll finally start to see third-party performance numbers all over the place. What is your guess? Here are mine:

SS Automatic
0-60: 4.7 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.51@100

SS Manual
0-60: 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile: 13.35@104Of course, this will depend on the weight of the driver plus any testing equipment they have on-board at the time of the test. I'm assuming 180lbs over the curb weight in the figures above.
96CAMaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:30 PM   #22
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
AAAAhhhhh

Radz! get out of my head!
MEH HEH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by WAY2FAST View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
I predict Auto/Manual will be within a couple tenths of each other for both engines.

V6
1/4mile -- 14.1 @100+
0-60 -- 5.9

V8
1/4mile -- 12.8 @ ~110
0-60 -- 4.6


I'll see that bet and raise you one!

12.7
0-60 in 4.5!
I like the way you think
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:50 PM   #23
Mosher
 
Mosher's Avatar
 
Drives: 1LT Cruze Summit White
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bedford
Posts: 708
Well I'll try too!!
SS
0-60 : 4.6
1/4 : 12.85@112MPH (perfect day and conditions)
Slalom Speed: 69.5mph
200ft skidpad: .97g
Braking 60-0: 115.01445214542 ft .... EXACTLY!!
Mosher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:59 PM   #24
Gary B
 
Gary B's Avatar
 
Drives: Subaru
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ct.
Posts: 573
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosher View Post
Well I'll try too!!
SS
0-60 : 4.6
1/4 : 12.85@112MPH (perfect day and conditions)
Slalom Speed: 69.5mph
200ft skidpad: .97g
Braking 60-0: 115.01445214542 ft .... EXACTLY!!
I'd have to agree. My 95 Z had about the same hp as the 10, and with gears and decent traction, I went low 12's at 114. I'd say with a good exhaust gears and traction, low 12's are within reach. A few mods and 11's will be right there!
Gary B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 07:19 PM   #25
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosher View Post
Well I'll try too!!
SS
0-60 : 4.6
1/4 : 12.85@112MPH (perfect day and conditions)
Slalom Speed: 69.5mph
200ft skidpad: .97g
Braking 60-0: 115.01445214542 ft .... EXACTLY!!
I like your numbers except...

0-60 4.553
skidpad .9428
60-0 109.6329' APPROXIMATELY
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 07:44 PM   #26
Rogue Leader
Iatefiberglassinsulation
 
Rogue Leader's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,601
I think the Skidpad numbers are a little optomistic..I see a .92 for this car, 1/4 mile time 12.9 at 109 mph on a good day. 4.5 0-60
__________________
2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - was daily driver, now toy
2020 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio - Daily Driver
2017 Mercedes Benz GLE 350 - Wifes Car
2008 Chevy Silverado 2500 HD LT 6.0 - Tow Vehicle
1991 Alfa Romeo 164S - Project Car
1994 Volkswagen Golf - Race Car

"Like" my race team on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/farfrumwinnin
Rogue Leader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 09:26 PM   #27
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Anybody know the Skidpad numbers for the G8 GT?

I'm guessing .97 for the SS....but I think the V6 will be very close to the G8 GT (since they share the same suspension...with a few tweaks in the V6's favor)
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 09:50 PM   #28
garagelogic
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMAN311 View Post
The performance numbers for the G8 GXP have been out and they vary quite a bit. Heck, even different articles in the same magazine (MotorTrend) show between 4.5 and 4.7 sec in 0-60. Also anywhere from 13.0-13.4 sec through the 1/4 mile for the GXP. Maybe it's just the difference between the manual and auto trans, they never really specified much about it.

The G8 GXP weighs a bit more and has a bit less power so I would hope that the Camaro SS manual will be good for high 12's in the 1/4 and at most 4.5-4.6sec 0-60 times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchell87 View Post
Well magazines have tested the G8 GXP anywhere between 4.6-5.2 so i would asume a 0-60 time of 4.6. Camaro has a few more ponies and weighs about the same. So with a good driver im going to say 4.6 seconds to 60 and 12.8 in the quarter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 96CAMaro View Post
V6 -- 0-60 5.9s, 1/4 14.3
V8 -- 0-60 4.6s, 1/4 12.7-12.8 (anything slower than I will get a Corvette instead. There is no way I am going to be on par with a 4.6L Mustang with over a 100hp difference [422-315 = 107hp]).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosher View Post
Well I'll try too!!
SS
0-60 : 4.6
1/4 : 12.85@112MPH (perfect day and conditions)
Slalom Speed: 69.5mph
200ft skidpad: .97g
Braking 60-0: 115.01445214542 ft .... EXACTLY!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary B View Post
I'd have to agree. My 95 Z had about the same hp as the 10, and with gears and decent traction, I went low 12's at 114. I'd say with a good exhaust gears and traction, low 12's are within reach. A few mods and 11's will be right there!
The optimism and hope is strong in his thread.

In all honesty, I would also like to see the SS dip into the 12's, I just don't think it is going to happen in stock trim on the stock tires. 3860/3913 is a lot of weight to get moving from a dead stop (trust me, I know). Yes, on a perfect day, with a perfect driver, with some sticky tires and a great 60ft time, I'm sure it will happen, but please, let's not hold that up as the norm if it does.

As for the skidpad numbers, I think some of you that are looking for .94g's or better are going to be disappointed. It's going to be very hard to build a mass-produced car and get those kind of numbers. Remember, production cars have to please a large cross-section of buyers so they by nature have to sacrifice in some performance for the sake of ride quality, smoothness, etc. Does the Camaro chassis have the ability to put .97+g's sure, but not on the suspension this car will be delivered with. Again, I hope I am wrong.
garagelogic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 04-04-2012 06:10 PM
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM
Hardcore racers rejoice!! GM Performance Parts to offer new Camaro body in white radz28 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 23 12-22-2008 09:57 AM
Camaro Accessories from SEMA FenwickHockey65 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 1 11-03-2008 02:25 PM
I wonder it this will make it on Camaro: GM reconfigurable performance display radz28 Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum 15 10-27-2008 01:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.