01-06-2009, 05:12 PM | #15 |
Drives: Black/Black 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 733
|
I thought the manual was faster in the 0-60?
|
01-06-2009, 05:18 PM | #16 | |
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
I'll say: Slalom Speed: 63.2mph 200ft skidpad: .88g Braking (70-0): 156ft Last edited by garagelogic; 01-07-2009 at 07:48 AM. |
|
01-06-2009, 05:19 PM | #17 |
PWA Relapse
|
I thought I read somewhere that the SS pulls .97 g's on the skidpad?
Personally I'm thinking about 13.9-14.1 for the V8 and 12.9-13.1 for the V8. Better with really good drivers (for both engines). 0-60 will be about 5.8 for the V6, about 4.6 for the V8 manual and about 4.5 for the V8 auto. - Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
01-06-2009, 05:21 PM | #18 | |
Member
Drives: '10 2SS/RS IOM, Wht Stripes, Roof Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wellesley Hills, MA
Posts: 850
|
Quote:
Why does everyone think the LS3 with MT6 (422hp) will be slower than the L99 (400hp) Auto? Because the auto is geared lower 1st thru 4th, this may make up for the difference?
__________________
2SS/RS IOM, Wht Stripes, 6MT, IO Interior, Roof, Eibach Sways, BC Coilovers, BMR Swing arms,Barton Short Shift, BBK LT's, GMPP exhaust, Hi-Flow Cats, MAST Stage 2 Cam, CAI = 470RWHP |
|
01-06-2009, 05:27 PM | #19 |
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
|
V6 -- 0-60 5.9s, 1/4 14.3
V8 -- 0-60 4.6s, 1/4 12.7-12.8 (anything slower than I will get a Corvette instead. There is no way I am going to be on par with a 4.6L Mustang with over a 100hp difference [422-315 = 107hp]). |
01-06-2009, 05:28 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Drives: 2010 SS/RS, '06 350Z Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: So. Maryland
Posts: 2,333
|
Manual V8 - 4.6....13.3....108
Auto V8 - 4.9....13.4....106 Mustang is 13.8 and you must consider the sizeable weight difference.
__________________
2SS/RS - Black/Black - CGM Rally Stripes - Auto - VIN 10171
|
01-06-2009, 05:29 PM | #21 | |
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
|
|
01-06-2009, 05:30 PM | #22 |
Petro-sexual
|
MEH HEH!!!
I like the way you think
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
01-06-2009, 05:50 PM | #23 |
Drives: 1LT Cruze Summit White Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bedford
Posts: 708
|
Well I'll try too!!
SS 0-60 : 4.6 1/4 : 12.85@112MPH (perfect day and conditions) Slalom Speed: 69.5mph 200ft skidpad: .97g Braking 60-0: 115.01445214542 ft .... EXACTLY!! |
01-06-2009, 05:59 PM | #24 |
Drives: Subaru Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ct.
Posts: 573
|
I'd have to agree. My 95 Z had about the same hp as the 10, and with gears and decent traction, I went low 12's at 114. I'd say with a good exhaust gears and traction, low 12's are within reach. A few mods and 11's will be right there!
|
01-06-2009, 07:19 PM | #25 |
Drives: the 2nd amendment home Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
|
|
01-06-2009, 07:44 PM | #26 |
Iatefiberglassinsulation
|
I think the Skidpad numbers are a little optomistic..I see a .92 for this car, 1/4 mile time 12.9 at 109 mph on a good day. 4.5 0-60
__________________
2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - was daily driver, now toy
2020 Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio - Daily Driver 2017 Mercedes Benz GLE 350 - Wifes Car 2008 Chevy Silverado 2500 HD LT 6.0 - Tow Vehicle 1991 Alfa Romeo 164S - Project Car 1994 Volkswagen Golf - Race Car "Like" my race team on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/farfrumwinnin |
01-06-2009, 09:26 PM | #27 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Anybody know the Skidpad numbers for the G8 GT?
I'm guessing .97 for the SS....but I think the V6 will be very close to the G8 GT (since they share the same suspension...with a few tweaks in the V6's favor) |
01-06-2009, 09:50 PM | #28 | |||||
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In all honesty, I would also like to see the SS dip into the 12's, I just don't think it is going to happen in stock trim on the stock tires. 3860/3913 is a lot of weight to get moving from a dead stop (trust me, I know). Yes, on a perfect day, with a perfect driver, with some sticky tires and a great 60ft time, I'm sure it will happen, but please, let's not hold that up as the norm if it does. As for the skidpad numbers, I think some of you that are looking for .94g's or better are going to be disappointed. It's going to be very hard to build a mass-produced car and get those kind of numbers. Remember, production cars have to please a large cross-section of buyers so they by nature have to sacrifice in some performance for the sake of ride quality, smoothness, etc. Does the Camaro chassis have the ability to put .97+g's sure, but not on the suspension this car will be delivered with. Again, I hope I am wrong. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camaro Product Manager - interview | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 11 | 04-04-2012 06:10 PM |
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
Hardcore racers rejoice!! GM Performance Parts to offer new Camaro body in white | radz28 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 23 | 12-22-2008 09:57 AM |
Camaro Accessories from SEMA | FenwickHockey65 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 1 | 11-03-2008 02:25 PM |
I wonder it this will make it on Camaro: GM reconfigurable performance display | radz28 | Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum | 15 | 10-27-2008 01:52 PM |