12-18-2014, 09:14 PM | #1 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
3.6 LFX to 4.6 stroker kit???
I hadn't seen this yet, thought it would be worth pointing out here. Sorry if repost.
Was browsing the Colorado/Canyon forums when I came across a post where Trifecta is claiming they are working on a stroker kit. Quote:
Thoughts?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
12-18-2014, 09:26 PM | #2 |
Boosted
Drives: 2012 1LT RS... with snails Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,455
|
I'm no stroking expert but 3.6 to 4.6 seems a bit much
__________________
IPS Twin Turbos, Corsa Exhaust, Ported Throttle Body. 461 rwhp 443 rwtq!! *Cameron Hass.ani* |
12-18-2014, 09:44 PM | #3 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
I thought so too
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
12-19-2014, 12:17 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2012 SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Placentia, CA
Posts: 2,130
|
Sounds interesting for sure.
|
12-19-2014, 01:51 AM | #5 |
Drives: '14 1LS Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Mandeville
Posts: 2,166
|
It does sound like it could be a little much. But if it's something that could be used in the lfx with success in our cars I'm totally for it!
__________________
Patiently waiting for my 2023 SS 1LE |
12-19-2014, 02:44 AM | #6 |
So what is a stroker kit exactly, and where did you get this info
|
|
12-19-2014, 04:35 AM | #7 |
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Stroker kit changes the crankshaft, connecting rods and pistons. It will lengthen the stroke of the engine, thus increasing the displacement.
One of the popular V8 stroker kits takes a 350 engine to a 383. So the increase is 33 Cubic inches. My guess the information is on the internet somewhere. Checking for further information now. Found it: http://coloradofans.com/forums/185-e...ml#post2364826
__________________
|
12-19-2014, 05:48 AM | #8 |
Drives: '13 2LT/RS Twin Turbo Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,073
|
That could be pretty cool, I wonder where that would put the redline at..
It does seem like a big jump. I'd like to see more. |
12-19-2014, 07:23 AM | #9 |
Onyx_Z7 <— Instagram
Drives: 2013 2ss 1le Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Delaware
Posts: 634
|
this would be a badass mod! hopefully they can succeed with R&D
|
12-19-2014, 09:23 AM | #10 |
I want this so bad! Forged internals and a tourqe boost! I bet this would go great with fi , I'm assuming this would change the sound of your engine alot? Since it adds another liter
|
|
12-19-2014, 10:03 AM | #11 |
|
wow that is pretty much the size of a small V8 so yea I think the sound of it will be a huge difference.
__________________
Specs
TSP Stage 2 Boosted Cam 227/235 at 114 LSA Fore Innovation Triple pump staged (Walbro 342 primary and 2x Walbro 450 secondaries) Procharger D1x with a 3.85 pulley ID1050x Injectors Flex Fuel Sensor Monster LT1 Twin Disk Clutch Holley Sniper Efi Intake Manifold NW 103mm Boosted TB 747rwhp at 12psi on E85 |
12-19-2014, 10:43 AM | #12 |
Drives: 2014 1LS Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Derby CT
Posts: 409
|
If this comes out..I'b buying...
__________________
|
12-19-2014, 11:37 AM | #13 |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
I'm guessing this will be very expensive. Looking at the one picture, the block has been sleeved. I had previously contacted Darton about a product to suit this engine, they do have a modular integrated deck sleeve that will work they will sell to the tune of $~1900 for just the sleeves, then you have to have them installed.
These are not Darton MID sleeves in the picture. Maybe something cheaper? Darton said you could go to a 98mm max bore with their sleeves... Given the same assumption that they went to a 98mm max bore with whatever is going on here, they would have to increase the stroke by about .6" (~15.24mm)... So the with the increased stroke, the rods would have to get shorter because there is no way in hell to move the pin height in the piston far enough to compensate for that increase. So now you've got a 1.3602 rod/stroke ratio which is not exactly desirable. If this is even real, I wouldn't consider putting it in a car. It's a stump puller and would not rev, and I think we aalllll know that you guys don't like low end torque gains. It's an engine fit for a truck. And it probably won't last long with that rod stroke ratio if that's about what it really is. Bigger isn't always better. Everyone moans and complains about the company that's supposedly bringing this to market, is it weird how they don't come around anymore, but are hot after the next big thing (colorado)... It's just weird. This has a two letter company written all over it. Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 12-19-2014 at 01:02 PM. |
12-19-2014, 01:03 PM | #14 |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
WTF???
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|