Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2022, 08:35 PM   #1
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Tune sanity check

Hey all, I'll post this in the tuning section as well....

OK, I helped a buddy out and built him an LS3-based 416 (24X Reluctor) with a Novi 2200, 95-lb/hr injectors, ported 821s, 227/243/.620/.629 @114 cam, 2" LT headers, NW 102mm, 10% OD balancer. This is in a 2002 Corvette, M6 car.
Fuel system is a custom built return style using twin 525lph pumps @58psi.

Anyways, I'm trying to get the tune straightened out and I need a little advice/assistance.

The car has been tuned before, as it came to me with a N/A 416 (spun main bearing). So, first thing I did to the tune was apply the appropriate injector data, and update the MAP sensor (3-Bar) information. It is still currently utilizing the 1-Bar SD VE table.

The car will start right up, idle for maybe 2 seconds and then die....repeatedly. Can't even operate the throttle pedal to keep it going. The WB reads 20.

Here's the strange thing: on one of these attempts, the intake pipe popped off the throttle body. The car proceeded to idle and respond to the throttle pedal (not great, but it did respond). WB read 10, and my eyes and nose believed it.

The intercooler is equipped with a 50mm Bypass Valve that closes ~2 inHg, so in my mind, it should be opened, and bypassing air, at idle.

My assumption is that the VE table and/or MAF table are significantly off and causing my initial issues. Tune is attached.

Thoughts?

Should I just add 10-15% across the board to both VE and MAF tables?
Attached Files
File Type: zip 2002 C5 Corvette_416 - Copy.zip (229.9 KB, 99 views)
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2022, 09:03 PM   #2
Nmbr1gmfan
 
Drives: Fast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL.
Posts: 410
I would fail the MAF and work the VE. Attack each one separately.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPvVm...&feature=share
New and improved non-violation sig vid!!
Nmbr1gmfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2022, 09:22 PM   #3
cc-rider

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,172
Would agree. Fail the MAF. Tune VE. But…you mentioned a lot in that post that would leave me to think that you need to look at every nut and bolt of that build. Give it the best once-over you can.
cc-rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2022, 05:36 AM   #4
eLeSthree

 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,904
What did the log say during the start up? Did it have fuel pressure? Did the Fuel trims max out? Which injectors?
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT
1158whp 1017wtq.

2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD
630whp 658wtq

2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4
waiting for tunes...
eLeSthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2022, 02:15 PM   #5
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc-rider View Post
Would agree. Fail the MAF. Tune VE. But…you mentioned a lot in that post that would leave me to think that you need to look at every nut and bolt of that build. Give it the best once-over you can.
Thanks for the tip, however I don't know what I posted that led to the assumption that I need to check every nut and bolt of this build....
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2022, 02:28 PM   #6
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by eLeSthree View Post
What did the log say during the start up? Did it have fuel pressure? Did the Fuel trims max out? Which injectors?
Fuel pressure was steady at 58psi. I'll post the log, brief as it is...

The injectors are Fuel Injector Connection units, 95lb/hr @ 43.5psi (114.3 @ 58psi).
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 07:53 AM   #7
cc-rider

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batmanntexas View Post
Thanks for the tip, however I don't know what I posted that led to the assumption that I need to check every nut and bolt of this build....
I think I was reading too far into the intake popping off comment.
cc-rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 08:51 AM   #8
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc-rider View Post
I think I was reading too far into the intake popping off comment.
It happens

I am in no way saying that I am incapable of making a mistake or two...been there, done that...and I'm sure I'll be there again at some point, I just think my current issue is strictly related to a tune issue, and more specifically, an airflow issue.

More to follow...
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:54 AM   #9
eLeSthree

 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,904
TB Scalar set and minimum running airflow increased about 10%? I'm not even sure C5s are DBW. Just spit balling...
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT
1158whp 1017wtq.

2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD
630whp 658wtq

2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4
waiting for tunes...
eLeSthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 06:12 PM   #10
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by eLeSthree View Post
TB Scalar set and minimum running airflow increased about 10%? I'm not even sure C5s are DBW. Just spit balling...
TB Scalar has a value, and it's different than the stock LS1, not sure if it's correct though, and the Base Running Airflow has been increased also. It is DBW....

Interesting fact, I pulled a 4.8L out of a 2001 Yukon the other day and it was DBW!! Who knew....?
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 08:44 PM   #11
eLeSthree

 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,904
Idle Airflow in P/N is 0
MAF curve is wonky ( i realize you havent gotten there yet)
Closed loop Enable ECT is 260
LTFTs are Disabled
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT
1158whp 1017wtq.

2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD
630whp 658wtq

2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4
waiting for tunes...
eLeSthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2022, 08:47 AM   #12
JMI
 
JMI's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Jewel Camaro SS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: East Coast
Posts: 392
Don't bother tuning the MAF, delete it.You'll probably max it out with decent boost. Do the custom OS system and tune it SD.That what we did with those older C5 Vettes. Did some 427's W/YSI with the 2/ 2.5/3 bar setup street cars(depends on the ECM used. 20psi boost a few years back. It's time consuming,But once it's dialled in.Drove and worked perfect. 9 second street cars driven too and from the track. Nothing special now, but back in the day,it was pretty good.
__________________
BTR LSX388,AGP Twin Turbo.6L90,GM 9.9" Diff.Fore Innovations Level 4 fuel system.Great fuel economy !!!! 1xxx RWHP
JMI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2022, 03:03 PM   #13
stevieturbo

 
Drives: it changes
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,126
You say it's a 24x crank...does it have the correct corresponding 1x cam trigger ?
stevieturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2022, 10:58 AM   #14
Slowhawk
 
Drives: 1999 Trans Am
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 2,017
This doesn't tune like the e-38.

maf off,open loop. can leave l-terms if you like to dial in.
All the work will be VE table. 411 pcm's have limiters so you might go into limp mode by injector/ve scale.

Start, take notice of a/f. adjust ve till you get into ballpark . max out ETC predicted airflow table.

They are easy when you get a handle on it.
Slowhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.