Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2018, 03:28 PM   #1
ARuiz9
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Phoeniz, AZ
Posts: 54
BTR stage 3 cam concern

I recently had my cam install done on my 2015 1LE along with a flex fuel kit, the car already has LTs and cold air intake installed prior. The car was Dyno tuned and it put down 509 hp and 423 torque on e85, now I did a lot of searching prior to having the cam upgrade done and I've never seen anyone put down that much HP on just those upgrades, my concern is that the car was very aggressively tuned, anyone know wether that may be the case. Another thing is the mpg's dropped a lot more than what I was expecting to lose so I feel like it might be running too rich and car bucks a lot on around 1000 RPM mind you this car has 3.91 gears. Anyone have any input on this???
ARuiz9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 03:56 PM   #2
scv_guy

 
scv_guy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Valencia
Posts: 1,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by ARuiz9 View Post
I recently had my cam install done on my 2015 1LE along with a flex fuel kit, the car already has LTs and cold air intake installed prior. The car was Dyno tuned and it put down 509 hp and 423 torque on e85, now I did a lot of searching prior to having the cam upgrade done and I've never seen anyone put down that much HP on just those upgrades, my concern is that the car was very aggressively tuned, anyone know wether that may be the case. Another thing is the mpg's dropped a lot more than what I was expecting to lose so I feel like it might be running too rich and car bucks a lot on around 1000 RPM mind you this car has 3.91 gears. Anyone have any input on this???
Your mileage dropped most likely do the E85. If you want to see your true MPG fill up with 91 and see what you get out of a full tank. As for the 509rwhp every dyno will read differently there are setting in the dyno software that can be changed to show higher HP and also lower HP. I'd run it on a different dyno and see what it puts down. for example my car will put down 750rwhp on a Dynojet and 701 on a Mustang dyno.
lastly as for the bucking, thats the characteristics of a large cam. pretty normal
scv_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 04:17 PM   #3
graf101
Trouble_SM
 
graf101's Avatar
 
Drives: 17' Summit White ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 449
If the car is "bucking" the tune needs to be touched up or corrected. I have been cammed for over 2 years and have never had a "buck or surge" issue on my 2015 1LE.
graf101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 04:36 PM   #4
Bo White


 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Summit White 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vance Alabama
Posts: 8,019
Dynos are not the same across the country. Ive been on quite a few and have varied as much as 30hp.
Bo White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 05:22 PM   #5
zz430camaro

 
zz430camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 1LE
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,485
Does it feel like 509 rwhp? Thats alot from just a cam and E85. E85 is about 2/3 the gas milage of gasoline.
zz430camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 06:40 PM   #6
WHAMMO


 
WHAMMO's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,640
Its all normal; e85 will be down on mpg a lot. Cam will surge and buck of this size on stock big tires and gearing. Mine especially bucks/surges 1400-1600, made worst by the extreme clutch I have. With all that said, I find the car easy to drive even then. Maybe ask your tuner to back the tune a bit safer, but I wouldn't think its a lot of hp there, maybe 5-10? Idk..
__________________
13' 1LE

Old setup: TSP 231-236/Tick 660/.105 PR, UDP, SW LT 2'' & HFC, stock NPP & H pipe, VR-DRX CAI, air scoop, Goertz1 manifold, 102mm BBK, 26" Toyo DRs, Forgestars R17x10 & F18x8, rear seat delete, remote Pat G tune Autocal, 7400 limiter, Spec Mini Twin. 91oct. 11.90@122.3, 0-60ft 2.0 / 11.99@123.6, 0-60ft 2.1 DA+819 ...519RWHP SAE

Solid roller SBE LS3, FED, LLSR, 91oct, 605rwhp N/A. Tuned by Pat G. Build by me.
WHAMMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 09:28 PM   #7
marklsx
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 103
I have cam surge at lower RPMs with my BTR Stage 3. You get used to it though, I don't mind it at all.
__________________
2014 1SS - BTR Stg3, GMPP CNC Heads, Kooks LTs & cats, Magnaflow 2.5" Street w/Res X, Z28 CAI
marklsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 09:44 PM   #8
ARuiz9
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Phoeniz, AZ
Posts: 54
I let the e85 burn out and have since filled up twice on 91 it has gone up a bit but not in the area I was expecting to be at. I'm not an aggressive driver so I was expecting a bit higher. But my concern is the bucking and the very high hp considering I told them my number one priority was the drivability wasn't chasing high numbers.
ARuiz9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 12:56 AM   #9
Adriangarza40
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/LS3
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 89
I have the BTR (vengeance racing) Nightfury cam and anything under about 1600rpm is all bucking and surging. Thats just the way they're gonna drive. You gotta get used to having the rpms around 2000 in all gears for them to drive really smooth
__________________
2014 LS3, AFDynamics Cai, Speed Engineering catless headers, BTR Nightfury cam 484RWHP 453lbft TQ
Adriangarza40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 08:02 AM   #10
acammer
GPI Sales Consultant
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS SGM
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 2,794
Sounds like a really "happy" dyno. Like these guys have said, they'll make different numbers on different dynos. My car made 473whp/433wtq on my tuners heart-breaker dyno, and then laid out 497/455 on a Dynojet a few weeks later at a dyno day. So, I wouldn't hang a lot on dyno numbers - if the AFR is safe and it doesn't spark knock, it's good to go from a "safe" perspective. What surprises me about your numbers is the torque seems pretty low when compared to the horsepower - maybe a quirk of the dyno again.

Bucking and surging at 1,000rpm is completely expected with a cam having 10.5* of overlap. Good tuning can only go so far to helping the engine run smoothly at low rpm and loads. The problem is when the airflow is so slow (throttle closed, low rpm) that overlap causes all sorts of problems, you push some dirty air up into the intake, you pull some exhaust back into the cylinder, etc. You end up with a dirty intake air charge and poor combustion as a result, that's why they idle nasty and don't behave nicely under light load.

You wouldn't have an expectation that you'd have smoothness under 1500rpm with a cam like that unless you've got the throttle pretty open. My SS3 cam is 19* of overlap, and it's not real happy under 2000rpm unloaded. I can hang it at 1200rpm with a load on it and it'll be smooth, but once the throttle closes it reminds you in a hurry it's not stock.

The MPG drop is expected, you've made everything at low load and rpm extremely inefficient. Cars with big cams often smell a bit rich because of the incomplete combustion that occurs at idle, just another price you pay to make power all motor.

One more thing to keep in mind - yes a 1LE has 3.91 gears, but because it also has different ratios in the transmission your first and second gear overall ratio are essentially identical to a regular SS with 3.45 gears, your third gear is just slightly more aggressive, and the benefit of the 3.91 doesn't really show up at all until 4th gear, which is much better than a regular SS car with 3.45s. A 1LE would need a 4.56 rear gear to match a regular SS with 4.10s in first and second. Just something to keep in mind when discussing low speed drivability of a 1LE car.
__________________
GPI Max Package 2.0: Brodix BR7 heads/GPI porting, MAX3 cam, ST2116LSR, BSR Max Lift rockers, LS7 LSXR with 103mm TB, Vararam OTR, Mcleod RXT, G-Force/Strange 9" IRS setup with 4.63 gear. 551whp, 11.1@124mph.
Got a question about a GPI product? Feel free to shoot me a message!
acammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 09:00 AM   #11
IDEALG
Chevy's "Rumble" Best!
 
IDEALG's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 ZL1 6 speed
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ideal Garage aka (Grayskull) Fords, nj
Posts: 4,458
Send a message via AIM to IDEALG
You probably won't get rid of bucking at 1000 rpm that's just too low of an rpm to be driving at with a giant cam. Bucking in a camaro above 1200 rpm is a tune issue and can be fixed. Haters will hate but i've tuned many camaros and fixed many tunes from so called professionally tuned Camaros from the internet favored shops. You can call me all the names you want i don't care anymore i've seen enough to understand that most places don't know how to Tune properly.



Secondly the best Bang for your buck is the Jannetty Racing Rough idle cam, don't get me wrong i love BTR and use them often but i've seen the most gains in camaro's with Jannetty's Cam. 93 octane 485 rwhp without ported heads



Honestly all you guys need to forget about that big number and look at your overall powerband.
__________________
IDEALG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 10:21 AM   #12
Roader
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Alabama
Posts: 673
What kind of mileage are you talking with E85? The best I can do is 16mpg on cruise control on highway and anywhere from 9-11 mpg in city
Roader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 12:50 PM   #13
ARuiz9
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Phoeniz, AZ
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roader View Post
What kind of mileage are you talking with E85? The best I can do is 16mpg on cruise control on highway and anywhere from 9-11 mpg in city
It was in the low 11s, I wasn't worried about the e85 since I'm not going to be running on very often. Prior to the cam my overall mpg's was high 16s which I thought was very good considering I don't drive on the highway too often. I was hoping to be in the low 14s with the cam assuming I drive the same way, again my real concern though is that my car was tuned too aggressively and perhaps that's going to make my car burn too much fuel and make the driveability suffer.
ARuiz9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 01:27 PM   #14
Roader
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Alabama
Posts: 673
I don't understand tuned to aggressively since you arnt a FI car with boost turned up. As long as the AFR is good I wouldn't be concerned. Its to hard to talk to your surge issues without seeing whats going on
Roader is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.