03-22-2018, 06:55 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 Ashen Grey Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 378
|
2.5in vs 3in exhaust
So I have an opportunity to purchase a 2.5in catback at a decent price. What’s everyone’s opinion in the difference from 2.5 to 3in. Should I spend the extra for 3in. I know obviously more air flow, which is always needed, but will there be much of a difference in the two. But the time I’m done with the car I’d like to have around 650-700hp.
__________________
2012 M6
Kooks 1 7/8, off road pipes , full corsa exhaust ID1300s/ 22% lower / 2.5 upper, JLT CAI, DSX flex fuel, DSX AUX fuel pump. S19 cam Tuned and built by Speed Inc 635/632-93 octane 725/738-E85 |
03-22-2018, 07:06 AM | #2 |
Drives: ZL1 Convertible Auto Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 330
|
I did 3 inch and asked my tuner about it later. He said the difference between 2.5 and 3 wouldn't be much or any but the muffler makes a difference. A restrictive (quiet) muffler would lower hp compared to less muffler or straight through.
__________________
LS3 intake and throttle body, Huron Speed Products twin turbo with 6265 oil less turbos, and 3" header back, JRE smooth cam, ID1300, Fore dual 450lph pumps with MSD voltage booster, A6, 305/45/17 MT Street R
|
03-22-2018, 07:41 AM | #3 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 Ashen Grey Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 378
|
If it helps it’s a stainless works system. And I have kooks headers and off road kooks cats.
__________________
2012 M6
Kooks 1 7/8, off road pipes , full corsa exhaust ID1300s/ 22% lower / 2.5 upper, JLT CAI, DSX flex fuel, DSX AUX fuel pump. S19 cam Tuned and built by Speed Inc 635/632-93 octane 725/738-E85 |
03-23-2018, 10:10 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2014 ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 345
|
Spend the money elsewhere. The factory back with no cats is perfect. Cats are still limiting you and a cat back wont help with scavenging or any other reduction for that matter.
Unless its free your money is better spent on a Cam, better tune, more pulley etc. |
03-29-2018, 12:00 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2014-ZL1-M6-CRT, 68 camaro SS 496 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: N.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 262
|
From everything I have read, a 2.5" system should be plenty..There seems to be lots of guys between700 -800WHP still using the stock 2.5" NPP ...Is the stainless works system for an SS since its 2.5" , all the aftermarket ZL1 cat backs I have seen are 3"
__________________
2014- Crystal Red-ZL1 #1601, M6, Recaro, sunroof, Nav-stock-SOLD
1968 Camaro SS Clone- 496 BBC, Legend 5speed, 12 bolt 1970 Nova SS- 383 SBC 588hp, 200-4r, 12 bolt |
05-24-2018, 04:27 PM | #6 |
Drives: Lexus GX 470 Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Indio,ca
Posts: 16
|
The Cuthroat exhaust might give you the the flow you want. No need to straight pipe. Plus it's reversible. https://youtu.be/3Ch4hCTPTZw
|
05-24-2018, 04:44 PM | #7 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
If I remember this correctly, a few years ago Bo White swapped out a 2.5 inch for a 3 inch OBX catback on his supercharged Camaro and the difference was about 50 HP. That is, if I remember correctly. I know it was a significant number. I always say go 3 inch. Why not? If money is an issue, then do what is best for you. But if it is more of a choice, then go with 3 inch.
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|