Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2020, 02:08 PM   #1
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Rotating Assemblies Up To 468 CID

I was talking to a guy from Texas Speed on the phone about getting a new engine rotating assembly. He told me the biggest I could go to was a 416 CID, without changing anything. Just purchase and put in. I was thinking I saw some other people doing 427 on here too.

My question is, does anyone know what is required of the engine (or anything else) to go to a 468 CID? The guy explained some but I was a little confused. He mentioned re-sleeving I think (not 100% what's involved in that). The options above a 416 seemed to be a wide variety between a 416 and 468. Any input also would be greatly appreciated.
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2020, 02:59 PM   #2
AGM 1LE

 
AGM 1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 SS/ 1LE
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 922
A 416 would be the stock 4.065in bore with a 4.0in crank. I think the 427 would be a 4.1in crank with the cylinders honed to 4.070in. To get to 468 you would for sure have to re-sleeve and stroke it.
__________________
2014 1SS/1LE
AGP 57/57s, E85 + meth injection, Monster triple, ZL1 diff swap, Z28 coilovers
AGM 1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2020, 03:12 PM   #3
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGM 1LE View Post
A 416 would be the stock 4.065in bore with a 4.0in crank. I think the 427 would be a 4.1in crank with the cylinders honed to 4.070in. To get to 468 you would for sure have to re-sleeve and stroke it.
I found this link https://www.onallcylinders.com/2017/...e-performance/

If you scroll down it says they don't recommend boring over 4.080 inch, but leaving them as thick as possible when running boost. I'd like to SC one day. I wonder if changing my rotating assembly would be no benefit to me then or if it's due to issues with integrity to the structure of the block by thinning them out?
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2020, 03:18 PM   #4
gtstorey

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,175
I think the 468 also requires a tall deck block.
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2020, 03:37 PM   #5
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtstorey View Post
I think the 468 also requires a tall deck block.
Like a completely different block? TSP was showing it compatible, but I'm not sure how accurate the web page is.
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2020, 04:21 PM   #6
gtstorey

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,175
TSP shows the 468 as being for tall deck blocks, so not an LS3 block.
https://www.texas-speed.com/p-1035-t...-assembly.aspx

The largest they go on a short deck block is 454 but I think that is still on an iron block.
The 438 or 441 are supposed to work with an LS7.
The largest they list for the LS3 is a 427/429 ci.
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2020, 10:01 AM   #7
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtstorey View Post
TSP shows the 468 as being for tall deck blocks, so not an LS3 block.
https://www.texas-speed.com/p-1035-t...-assembly.aspx

The largest they go on a short deck block is 454 but I think that is still on an iron block.
The 438 or 441 are supposed to work with an LS7.
The largest they list for the LS3 is a 427/429 ci.
Oh yea! You're right, thanks for pointing that out to me.
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2020, 12:43 PM   #8
acammer
GPI Sales Consultant
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS SGM
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGM 1LE View Post
A 416 would be the stock 4.065in bore with a 4.0in crank. I think the 427 would be a 4.1in crank with the cylinders honed to 4.070in. To get to 468 you would for sure have to re-sleeve and stroke it.
4.065x4.000 is a 415, need that 0.005 overbore to get to a 416. We don't usually recommend going beyond a 4" stroke because you start pulling the piston out the bottom of the cylinder, and it'll rock a little, and that will wear things. For a race motor, have at it, but for the street the 4.00" stroke is where you usually want to quit.

You can get more bore with resleeving, etc. My first question would be what's the application here... ie. why do you want to get to so much displacement?
__________________
GPI Max Package 2.0: Brodix BR7 heads/GPI porting, MAX3 cam, ST2116LSR, BSR Max Lift rockers, LS7 LSXR with 103mm TB, Vararam OTR, Mcleod RXT, G-Force/Strange 9" IRS setup with 4.63 gear. 551whp, 11.1@124mph.
Got a question about a GPI product? Feel free to shoot me a message!
acammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2020, 03:48 PM   #9
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by acammer View Post
4.065x4.000 is a 415, need that 0.005 overbore to get to a 416. We don't usually recommend going beyond a 4" stroke because you start pulling the piston out the bottom of the cylinder, and it'll rock a little, and that will wear things. For a race motor, have at it, but for the street the 4.00" stroke is where you usually want to quit.

You can get more bore with resleeving, etc. My first question would be what's the application here... ie. why do you want to get to so much displacement?
More power. However I think I've been looking at things wrong. I would like to boost down the road and I'm reading that I would need lower compression numbers for doing this or E85 for high compression/high boost. Am I reading that right? The stock engine 10.5:1 seems high compared to the recommended 8:1 or 9:1 compression ratio for boosting a car. Seems like I have two options as far as boosting, but which will have better results? Or does the 10.5 work? Which has the least risk for detonation? Etc. Thoughts?
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2020, 03:58 PM   #10
sixty9fordkiller
Donkey Dick Cam Camaro
 
sixty9fordkiller's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 M6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,998
i would stay with the stock displacement for boost and spend the money on a solid forged bottom end instead

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
__________________

Bone Stock
sixty9fordkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2020, 11:18 AM   #11
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixty9fordkiller View Post
i would stay with the stock displacement for boost and spend the money on a solid forged bottom end instead

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
You think the 10.5 compression will work then? The rotating assembly is the main determining factor for compression, right?
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2020, 09:27 PM   #12
Black_SS10
SomeguyK
 
Black_SS10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by frey.199 View Post
You think the 10.5 compression will work then? The rotating assembly is the main determining factor for compression, right?
You can change the compression by simply changing the rotating assembly as a whole OR by changing parts of it.

10.5.1 static compression (SCR) will be fine for boost. Look at what your dynamic compression (DCR) will be. This may help you.

https://www.enginebasics.com/Advanced Engine Tuning/Static vs Dynamic.html
__________________
TMS 427, Dart iron Block, Forged assembly, Frankenstien heads, AGP TT 62/62 BB turbo's, AGP/Fore triple fuel system, Tilton clutch, Holley 1 7/8 shorties, Technostalgia tail lights,Oracle, Aeroforce, MGW shifter,Flowmaster, Pegasus subframe bushings,BMR trailing & toe arms,Z28 UCA bushings,Zl1 rear sway bar,Prothane,BMR,Goodridge brake lines,Ridetech HQ coilovers,3.91,Trutrac,billet caps,DSS axles,HE offest,built TR6060,1LE diffuser,Havoc spoiler,SSclones,20in MRR 017, Pirelli P Zero, Nitto NT555RII

More to come.
Black_SS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2020, 10:44 PM   #13
lemontwist

 
lemontwist's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 2SS/RS L99,11 2SS/RS LS3totaled
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: mooresville nc
Posts: 1,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by acammer View Post
4.065x4.000 is a 415, need that 0.005 overbore to get to a 416. We don't usually recommend going beyond a 4" stroke because you start pulling the piston out the bottom of the cylinder, and it'll rock a little, and that will wear things. For a race motor, have at it, but for the street the 4.00" stroke is where you usually want to quit.

You can get more bore with resleeving, etc. My first question would be what's the application here... ie. why do you want to get to so much displacement?
what is the application great question! in these days of mega power cars off the lot we seem to forget what a 9 second car was because of what it is now.
what is usable/reasonable power for the street. it's not far fetched for LS motors can hit 1000HP boosted without big displacement.
all BS and jokes aside in a street car 600hp is a chit load of power on the street.
lemontwist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2020, 09:54 AM   #14
frey.199
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Granville, Ohio
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_SS10 View Post
You can change the compression by simply changing the rotating assembly as a whole OR by changing parts of it.

10.5.1 static compression (SCR) will be fine for boost. Look at what your dynamic compression (DCR) will be. This may help you.

https://www.enginebasics.com/Advanced Engine Tuning/Static vs Dynamic.html
Thanks for this. Did not know their was a static and dynamic and that you go by the dynamic compression, not the static. Called TSP back and looks like I'm running about 7.83 CR with their cam installed. I guess my next question would be, if I run boost, at what point do I need to change pistons, etc to something forged?
frey.199 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.