Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


View Poll Results: What do you prefer in your Z/28?
TT V6, 450 HP, -150 lbs than SS, $40,000. 25 17.24%
DI V8, 450 HP, same weight as SS, $40,000. 27 18.62%
LSA, 550 HP, + 150 lbs than SS, $46,000. 93 64.14%
Voters: 145. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2009, 01:44 PM   #29
boxmonkeyracing
juggernaut
 
boxmonkeyracing's Avatar
 
Drives: VRSCF, 2011 SS vert
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: kenly, nc
Posts: 3,343
Send a message via AIM to boxmonkeyracing Send a message via Yahoo to boxmonkeyracing
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandotron View Post
I can't imagine GM putting the new DI V8 in ONLY the Z28. I imagine it'll go in the SS as well, like when the LS1 replaced the LT1.
they wouldn't put it only in the z28. but there could be different sizes put in the other cars. ie 6.2 L in the Z28 but a 5.7 in the camaro ss.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name.
boxmonkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 01:46 PM   #30
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
my mind....


lol seriously tho... its possible
Well - considering the LLT makes more than 50 horse' in Camaro than the LY7 does in my wifey's Malibu, maybe that is a good call. It's my understanding the shortblocks of both about the same so that leaves the intake manifold and valvetrain among the biggest differences, aside from the DI. I guess it's reasonable to expect similar gains with a DI 6.2
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:44 PM   #31
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
Well - considering the LLT makes more than 50 horse' in Camaro than the LY7 does in my wifey's Malibu, maybe that is a good call. It's my understanding the shortblocks of both about the same so that leaves the intake manifold and valvetrain among the biggest differences, aside from the DI. I guess it's reasonable to expect similar gains with a DI 6.2

and the tune/camshafts/etc

look at the LS3 in the vette compared to in the Camaro. similar, but the vette still edges out on power.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:47 PM   #32
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
and the tune/camshafts/etc

look at the LS3 in the vette compared to in the Camaro. similar, but the vette still edges out on power.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:47 PM   #33
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post

its not hard to coax power from a motor... its just expensive.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:29 PM   #34
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
and the tune/camshafts/etc

look at the LS3 in the vette compared to in the Camaro. similar, but the vette still edges out on power.
so they say
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:31 PM   #35
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
or,
they could FI the DI for 600+, Oh yeah baby!
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:33 PM   #36
Camarorss350
camaro blogger
 
Camarorss350's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black on Black SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NJ + Atlanta GA
Posts: 358
Send a message via AIM to Camarorss350
I personally would like to see the Z/28 as a handling option. Kinda like the stang bangs have the Track Pack...


GM wont make the Z28 too ridiculous or it will cut into Vette sales... or vice versa...
Camarorss350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:39 PM   #37
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
As the OP I should of already voted, but I wanted to think a little more based on your comments. I believe the Z/28 based on future and past should have the DI Gen 5 engine.
The 302 was late 60's better tech, and today the soon to be here DI Gen 5 fits the bill. Want more power go FI.
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:42 PM   #38
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarorss350 View Post
I personally would like to see the Z/28 as a handling option. Kinda like the stang bangs have the Track Pack...


GM wont make the Z28 too ridiculous or it will cut into Vette sales... or vice versa...
It's gotta be a CAR not an option. The Z/28 has been a car for too long.
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:27 PM   #39
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxmonkeyracing View Post
all I got right this second is from wards auto and is on cz28

L92 with DI mod

with an engine totally designed for DI and all the other goodies expect to see more increase in power.

I'll do more digging when I can. I'm currently at work.
The amount of research, time consumption, and other issues would probably make it cost considerably more than the already built LSA. Price is what is to be considered as much as the specs, and the only good balance between the two would be the LSA. I'll be the first to admit I'd rather have a N/A, but the point of Forced Induction is a cheaper method of raising power than to say, replace the current engine with a bigger one.

Again, this car needs to make around 550-600 HP to compete with the GT500. This is it's main competition, and a 500 HP motor, it being the LSA or DI V8, will simply not outperform the GT500. All in all, the cheapest way of achieving this HP range is the LSA.
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:33 PM   #40
boxmonkeyracing
juggernaut
 
boxmonkeyracing's Avatar
 
Drives: VRSCF, 2011 SS vert
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: kenly, nc
Posts: 3,343
Send a message via AIM to boxmonkeyracing Send a message via Yahoo to boxmonkeyracing
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username View Post
The amount of research, time consumption, and other issues would probably make it cost considerably more than the already built LSA. Price is what is to be considered as much as the specs, and the only good balance between the two would be the LSA. I'll be the first to admit I'd rather have a N/A, but the point of Forced Induction is a cheaper method of raising power than to say, replace the current engine with a bigger one.

Again, this car needs to make around 550-600 HP to compete with the GT500. This is it's main competition, and a 500 HP motor, it being the LSA or DI V8, will simply not outperform the GT500. All in all, the cheapest way of achieving this HP range is the LSA.
if you say so. . .
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name.
boxmonkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:36 PM   #41
a_Username


 
a_Username's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 3,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxmonkeyracing View Post
if you say so. . .
:party0048: I win! :party0048:
a_Username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:46 PM   #42
boxmonkeyracing
juggernaut
 
boxmonkeyracing's Avatar
 
Drives: VRSCF, 2011 SS vert
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: kenly, nc
Posts: 3,343
Send a message via AIM to boxmonkeyracing Send a message via Yahoo to boxmonkeyracing
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_Username View Post
:party0048: I win! :party0048:
lol yes you win an internet argument. lol. because there's no point in this debate. you're dead set on your point even if it might be the wrong one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name.
boxmonkeyracing is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.