Supercharged 97 mustang - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

ZachSGMSS · 11-13-2012, 12:39 PM

The owner of this car has been talkin crap about my car ever since he found out my car is getting turbocharged so I suppose this belongs here.please move if it should be somewhere else.. anyway all I know is its a 97 I think and that it is supercharged.. truthfully I couldn't give a crap if he could beat me in race but he said his car ran a 11.7 at 165 mph.. shouldnt either the time or speed be lower for either of those numbers to make sense?

KMPrenger · 11-13-2012, 12:57 PM

165MPH??????????

Thats about 50MPH faster than you need to go to run those kind of times. BS flag on that for sure.

CryoMan10 · 11-13-2012, 01:05 PM

bs for sure. My 95 331w/vortech S-trim was not near that trap speed ( and i was putting down 463RWHP)

2010SS2SS · 11-13-2012, 01:11 PM

116.5?

MichaelH · 11-13-2012, 01:26 PM

umm im pretty sure with that trap speed he'd be running close to or at 8's. Thats def bullshit to put in perspective my SS trailblazer ran a 11.81 at 125 i believe ill have to double check the time slips again, but it was around there so yea this guy isnt running 165 in the 1/4

big hammer · 11-13-2012, 02:18 PM

a supercharged 97 mustang gt would be lucky to run low 13's.

archtaan · 11-13-2012, 03:03 PM

Not a chance in hell. I have 1100rwhp and trap in the 150's.

If he said 125 then ok, but 165 is in the 8 second category.

Oxtar41 · 11-13-2012, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by archtaan

Not a chance in hell. I have 1100rwhp and trap in the 150's.

If he said 125 then ok, but 165 is in the 8 second category.

Liar, you have 1087.

ZachSGMSS · 11-13-2012, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger

Thats about 50MPH faster than you need to go to run those kind of times. BS flag on that for sure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by archtaan

If he said 125 then ok, but 165 is in the 8 second category.

Yup that's about what I was thinking after looking at the fast list down in the drag racing section... He conveniently doesn't have this time slip either. Oh well.. thanks for the confirmation everyone just needed to make sure I wasn't the one that was wrong.

bdevault01 · 11-13-2012, 03:42 PM

Maybe he was going 50 when he crossed the starting line?

Cpaint · 11-14-2012, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdevault01

Maybe he was going 50 when he crossed the starting line?

LOL

davidcroft · 11-14-2012, 07:04 AM

If he's running 11s he doesn't have anywhere near a 1997 FORD motor in there. The 4.6 SOHC was 215 HP(325ish with blower @ crank). The Cobras were 305 and 420-450ish with a blower @ crank. The Cobras would maybe dip into mid 12s with a blower. We need LTs, Cold air and some drag radials to dip into mid 12s. race him stock and see what happens.

VADER SS L99 · 11-14-2012, 07:17 AM

If thats a stock non PI 4.6 motor that has been supercharged I bet you could beat him without a turbo upgrade. Some people just be hatin.

KMPrenger · 11-14-2012, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidcroft

If he's running 11s he doesn't have anywhere near a 1997 FORD motor in there. The 4.6 SOHC was 215 HP(325ish with blower @ crank). The Cobras were 305 and 420-450ish with a blower @ crank. The Cobras would maybe dip into mid 12s with a blower. We need LTs, Cold air and some drag radials to dip into mid 12s. race him stock and see what happens.

This.

I'm thinking a completely stock SS would beat a 97GT with blower unless there is other serious work involved on that GT.

11-13-2012, 12:39 PM	#1
ZachSGMSS Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM Camaro Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Tampa, Florida Posts: 511	Supercharged 97 mustang The owner of this car has been talkin crap about my car ever since he found out my car is getting turbocharged so I suppose this belongs here.please move if it should be somewhere else.. anyway all I know is its a 97 I think and that it is supercharged.. truthfully I couldn't give a crap if he could beat me in race but he said his car ran a 11.7 at 165 mph.. shouldnt either the time or speed be lower for either of those numbers to make sense?

11-13-2012, 12:57 PM	#2
KMPrenger Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009 Location: Jefferson City, Missouri Posts: 13,943	165MPH?????????? Thats about 50MPH faster than you need to go to run those kind of times. BS flag on that for sure. __________________ 2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties 2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)

11-13-2012, 01:05 PM	#3
CryoMan10 Drives: 2010 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: San Diego Posts: 131 View My Garage	bs for sure. My 95 331w/vortech S-trim was not near that trap speed ( and i was putting down 463RWHP) __________________ 2010 2ss/RS. Hurst ST 160T Vararam Tune only version comp cam 223/231 112lsa Stainless headers 1 7/8 Stock H pipe no mufflers solid subframe bushings Hotchkiss stage 3 suspension TSW wheels on NT05 3.91 gears Nitrous outlet plate system.

11-13-2012, 01:26 PM	#5
MichaelH SOCAL HT5 Drives: 2013 BRM ZL1 M6 Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NE Ohio Posts: 1,495 View My Garage	umm im pretty sure with that trap speed he'd be running close to or at 8's. Thats def bullshit to put in perspective my SS trailblazer ran a 11.81 at 125 i believe ill have to double check the time slips again, but it was around there so yea this guy isnt running 165 in the 1/4 __________________ 2013 ZL1 M6 - Mods-in the works Old vehicles 2010 CGM Camaro (sold) Other Vehicles: 2008 Kawasaki ZX6R-115 RWHP in mid summer 2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS- For Sale; Lots of extras

11-13-2012, 02:18 PM	#6
big hammer Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: manitoba Posts: 1,202	a supercharged 97 mustang gt would be lucky to run low 13's. __________________ Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da

11-13-2012, 01:11 PM	#4
2010SS2SS Drives: 2010 Camaro SS 2SS Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Cypress, texas Posts: 1,302	116.5?

11-13-2012, 03:03 PM	#7
archtaan Drives: car Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: USA Posts: 305	Not a chance in hell. I have 1100rwhp and trap in the 150's. If he said 125 then ok, but 165 is in the 8 second category.

11-13-2012, 03:42 PM	#10
bdevault01 Drives: 2011-1SS E-Force Supercharged Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Plano, TX Posts: 12	Maybe he was going 50 when he crossed the starting line?

11-14-2012, 07:04 AM	#12
davidcroft Sellin Chevy's since '06 Drives: 18ZL1 02Z-28 Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: DIRTY SOUFTH Posts: 1,461 View My Garage	If he's running 11s he doesn't have anywhere near a 1997 FORD motor in there. The 4.6 SOHC was 215 HP(325ish with blower @ crank). The Cobras were 305 and 420-450ish with a blower @ crank. The Cobras would maybe dip into mid 12s with a blower. We need LTs, Cold air and some drag radials to dip into mid 12s. race him stock and see what happens. __________________ '19 Z06-7Speed and lowered on stock bolts '02 Z28-Kooks true dual headers/TSP heads&cam/full suspension & Kmember sub40K orig miles. https://youtu.be/h6faSdcvNew TRADED!'17 ATS-V Coupe w/ Carbon Black pkg https://youtu.be/GH_t-R-TJV0 SOLD! '18 ZL1 Mosiac Blk SOLD!'16 SS Sedan-Forgestars/ARH/rotofab TRADED!2014 SS Sedan SOLD! 2013 Blue Ray1SS/1LE 1of20. TRADED! 2012 White 1SS/RS

11-14-2012, 07:17 AM	#13
VADER SS L99 Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Edmond, OK Posts: 2,909	If thats a stock non PI 4.6 motor that has been supercharged I bet you could beat him without a turbo upgrade. Some people just be hatin. __________________ BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.