Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2021, 06:51 AM   #15
joshnmn
2&THEHIT
 
joshnmn's Avatar
 
Drives: 5th Gen Camaro; 5th Gen Ram 3500
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Garner, NC
Posts: 1,012
Glass half full of a drink of your choice
joshnmn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2021, 04:56 PM   #16
gsxrturbo
 
Drives: 2010 ss
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: windom mn
Posts: 337
iF I was a guessing man you were running over 6500 rpms.which will throw rods.bad tunes and lots of timing break pistons not so much rods
gsxrturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2021, 11:11 PM   #17
Rem0v3r
 
Drives: 2013 ss2 vert l99
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South florida
Posts: 150
7 psi and 11.4 afr is fine.. 18-21 degrees on pump gas is too much.. that coupled with matching low/hi octane tables probably did it..

Never let someone give you matching octane tables.. the low octane table is referenced when the car detects knock so it knows how much timing to pull.. just because the low table has say 9 degrees.. doesnt mean the ecu will give you 9 degrees if you knock.. it will pull timing by a % until either
1. Knock stops or 2. The bottom value of the low octane table is reached...

Also, tunes can be MAF only... however.. you should ALWAYS tune the car for speed density... if your maf sensor fails you want to be able to drive the car.. you also want to not blow your engine if it defaults to its SD tune...
Rem0v3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2021, 06:36 AM   #18
FasNuf

 
FasNuf's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,613
^^^^^ This ^^^^
FasNuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2021, 06:55 AM   #19
eLeSthree

 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rem0v3r View Post
7 psi and 11.4 afr is fine.. 18-21 degrees on pump gas is too much.. that coupled with matching low/hi octane tables probably did it..

Never let someone give you matching octane tables.. the low octane table is referenced when the car detects knock so it knows how much timing to pull.. just because the low table has say 9 degrees.. doesnt mean the ecu will give you 9 degrees if you knock.. it will pull timing by a % until either
1. Knock stops or 2. The bottom value of the low octane table is reached...

Also, tunes can be MAF only... however.. you should ALWAYS tune the car for speed density... if your maf sensor fails you want to be able to drive the car.. you also want to not blow your engine if it defaults to its SD tune...
I would agree that 21 degrees is too much timing for 93 octane, with pretty much any boost and a SBE. If he ran E, and knew the risks of making power on the SBE, then 21 might be optimal timing. We dont know cause we didnt tune it.

As for the hi/low tables, that's not exactly how it works. Or I should say, there is more than one way to do it safely. My hi/low tables are exactly the same. Since I always run E, the Low table will never be used. But my timing values in both octane tables are really low. Like 10 degrees (@1.36gs). The rest of the timing comes from the several other adder tables like (flex fuel, alcohol, ect) to give me a total of around 20 degrees of total timing when the E is good and temps are in check. That timing wont be added if shitty fuel is used. The tune would revert to 10 degrees, essentially cutting timing in half.

My point is, you can't just assume by looking at those 2 tables that the tune is shit.

My tune will still pull timing if KR is detected.

We would need to see the data log to actually know what went wrong.

I'm not trying to defend his tune, cause I havent seen it. And it probably is not good. I'm just saying there are more than one way to achieve the same goal when tuning.
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT
1158whp 1017wtq.

2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD
630whp 658wtq

2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4
waiting for tunes...
eLeSthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2021, 07:36 AM   #20
FrankT
400HP used to be enough..
 
FrankT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS rs manual
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central NC
Posts: 772
It's my understanding that he was on 91 octane pump gas. VVE tables were not adjusted and were disabled.
__________________
FrankT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2021, 08:58 AM   #21
eLeSthree

 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankT View Post
It's my understanding that he was on 91 octane pump gas. VVE tables were not adjusted and were disabled.
Yea, that's not good.
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT
1158whp 1017wtq.

2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD
630whp 658wtq

2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4
waiting for tunes...
eLeSthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2021, 10:45 AM   #22
RyangAsh
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: KCMO
Posts: 180
Whicita, I have 2 good guess's. If it's the one I think it is, it is total irony.
RyangAsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2021, 10:36 AM   #23
Rem0v3r
 
Drives: 2013 ss2 vert l99
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: South florida
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by eLeSthree View Post
I would agree that 21 degrees is too much timing for 93 octane, with pretty much any boost and a SBE. If he ran E, and knew the risks of making power on the SBE, then 21 might be optimal timing. We dont know cause we didnt tune it.

As for the hi/low tables, that's not exactly how it works. Or I should say, there is more than one way to do it safely. My hi/low tables are exactly the same. Since I always run E, the Low table will never be used. But my timing values in both octane tables are really low. Like 10 degrees (@1.36gs). The rest of the timing comes from the several other adder tables like (flex fuel, alcohol, ect) to give me a total of around 20 degrees of total timing when the E is good and temps are in check. That timing wont be added if shitty fuel is used. The tune would revert to 10 degrees, essentially cutting timing in half.

My point is, you can't just assume by looking at those 2 tables that the tune is shit.

My tune will still pull timing if KR is detected.

We would need to see the data log to actually know what went wrong.

I'm not trying to defend his tune, cause I havent seen it. And it probably is not good. I'm just saying there are more than one way to achieve the same goal when tuning.
I agree there is more than 1 way to skin a cat.. ive eyeballs a few tunes and seen different strategies tuners have used to get to the same value..

Props on the 20 degrees.. I know you err on the side of caution so I'm sure you got it figured out...
We all take a risk with our investment when we let a 'tuner' program our cars.. to me.. matching octane tables is a huge red flag... if I see it, im going to ask questions.... and weather or not it would make a difference, I would go behind him and take out 5-10 degrees no matter what he said lol
Rem0v3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 10:21 AM   #24
smegal417
 
smegal417's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 71
My car puts 16° of advance in on 16lbs of boost at wot.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
smegal417 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 02:58 PM   #25
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by smegal417 View Post
My car puts 16° of advance in on 16lbs of boost at wot.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
When I was single turbo running SBE with 93 + meth... I ran up to 16psi at 15 deg
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 09:07 PM   #26
IKILLEDSUPERMAN_ZL1
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Wichita,KS
Posts: 603
The tune I had is definitely suspect. So after showing the tuner what others had concerns about with his tune he still says his tune wasnt the cause and it had no more then 15 degrees under boost. I mentioned that a SBE with low boost with my mods usually doesn't spit out rods unless the tune was jacked up.
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS, 6.0 iron block forged bottom end, Dart heads, BTR intake, Huron twin turbo kit, Summit stage 3 twin turbo cam, Circle D stage 4 6L90, 3800 FTI converter. BMR suspension, Viking coil overs, Fore triple pump fuel system.
IKILLEDSUPERMAN_ZL1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2021, 10:09 PM   #27
smegal417
 
smegal417's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealQuick View Post
When I was single turbo running SBE with 93 + meth... I ran up to 16psi at 15 deg
Yeah it's a single on E

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
smegal417 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2021, 12:12 PM   #28
gunchamp

 
gunchamp's Avatar
 
Drives: 15 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mountains of central PA
Posts: 1,442
SBE in these cars are relatively strong. Anything can happen obviously, but you were extremely low boost. That tune almost for sure caused this. Sucks man. Its the reason i went with who I felt was at the top of the tuning game for this platform. Car may still grenade, but I know for SURE it wont be because of the tune
__________________
15 Camaro SS- GPI max top end, ESS Vortech V3 9psi, ID 1050s, ZL1 pump, JMS bap, Long tubes, Corsa extreme, Circle D pro 5C, 391 rear, DSS carbon drive shaft, poly cradle bushings, tuned by Ted Jannetty and much much more
gunchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.