Mustang GT 5.0 vs Camaro SS Dyno Test Shoot Out BBK Performance Parts - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

08-G35s/6MT · 07-06-2012, 12:42 PM

Chrisco22 · 07-06-2012, 01:43 PM

who cares about the cars, damn shes gorgeous.

Coyotekiller · 07-06-2012, 03:16 PM

Repost?

08-G35s/6MT · 07-06-2012, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coyotekiller

Repost?

no

Deki · 07-06-2012, 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

no

Yes

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224235

Rock36 · 07-06-2012, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisco22

who cares about the cars, damn shes gorgeous.

Coyotekiller · 07-06-2012, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deki

Yes

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=224235

Now why couldn't I find that??? Damn search button...

Oh btw, camaro wins.

Deki · 07-06-2012, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coyotekiller

Now why couldn't I find that??? Damn search button...

Oh btw, camaro wins.

It's on the second page of the VS section. And way to spoil the ending for me!!!

08-G35s/6MT · 07-06-2012, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coyotekiller

Now why couldn't I find that??? Damn search button...

Oh btw, camaro wins.

Yeah and I think the crank hp aren't as innaccurate as the whp numbers would show, I think the 13 whp advantage to the 5.0 is partially attributable to it's lower parasthetic drivetrain loss because it's LRA vs IRS setup. But it seems as if one is overrated and/or one is underrated. Because, even still, a car rated 15 crank hp less should not dyno 13 whp more... Am I wrong ?

Deki · 07-06-2012, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Yeah and I think the crank hp aren't as innaccurate as the whp numbers would show, I think the 13 whp advantage to the 5.0 is partially attributable to it's lower parasthetic drivetrain loss because it's LRA vs IRS setup. But it seems as if one is overrated and/or one is underrated. Because, even still, a car rated 15 crank hp less should not dyno 13 whp more... Am I wrong ?

No, you are right. Engines are SAE rated out of the vehicle, and it does not take into account the parasitic loss from a LRA or the slightly higher parasitic loss from an IRS.

L99CAMA2011 · 07-06-2012, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

no

You going get it homey.

_Nick_ · 07-06-2012, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisco22

who cares about the cars, damn shes gorgeous.

She's even hotter driving a stick.

Sax1031 · 07-07-2012, 12:56 AM

that little 5.0 is putting in work

usnatclee · 07-07-2012, 10:42 AM

I may be biased but I would say that Camaro won that one.

07-06-2012, 01:43 PM	#2
Chrisco22 Drives: 2011 Chevy Camaro LS Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: United States Posts: 368	who cares about the cars, damn shes gorgeous. __________________ 2011 Camaro LS: [Rally Yellow] [22" Status Rims] [BBK Long Tube Headers w/ High Flow Cats] [Trifecta Tune] [K&N CAI] [Blacked out Bow Ties and Tail Lights] [15% Tint] [MAC Mufflers] [Rear Cat Delete] [Vmax Black Ice]

07-07-2012, 10:42 AM	#14
usnatclee Drives: '12 2SS/RS, '13 Vette, '13 Wrangler Join Date: May 2012 Location: wherever the Navy sends me Posts: 740	I may be biased but I would say that Camaro won that one. __________________ 2012 Camaro Ashen Grey Metallic 2SS/RS "Timberwolf". Custom exhaust, RX oil catch can and oil breather, CAI inc intake, SLP 160* thermostat, TSP 2" LT headers w/ off road pipes, custom cam, tuned. 467rwhp 450rwtq. 2013 Corvette Torch Red LS3. 378rwhp/375rwtq SAE corrected, tuned. ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!

07-06-2012, 03:16 PM	#3
Coyotekiller Account Suspended Drives: 2012 AGM 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Beaufort, NC Posts: 1,383	Repost?

07-07-2012, 12:56 AM	#13
Sax1031 Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Elgin,SC Posts: 2,707	that little 5.0 is putting in work